CA assisted suicide bill advances

assisted suicideWith doctors’ groups divided, legislation that would authorize assisted suicide cleared a key hurdle in Sacramento, triggering a fresh round of controversy.

Senate Bill 128, the so-called “End of Life Option Act,” was introduced earlier this year by state Sens. Lois Wolk, D-Davis, and Bill Monning, D-Carmel. Modeled on an Oregon law governing physician-assisted suicide, SB128 set out a series of conditions that would legalize but limit the practice.

Retooled after it initially stalled, the bill has now passed through the state Senate appropriations committee. “Backers of the assisted suicide proposal made some changes to the bill to gain more support after it initially met with strong opposition from hospitals, doctors, anti-abortion organizations and disability rights groups,” Reuters reported. “As currently written, it allows hospitals and medical providers to refuse to comply with a patient’s wish for assisted suicide, and also makes it illegal to pressure or manipulate people into ending their lives.”

The bill’s final language required that medication be self-administered by a mentally competent patient diagnosed by two physicians with six months or less to live, according to California Healthline.

Deepening controversy

One key to the bill’s committee clearance, Reuters noted, was the California Medical Association, which “still opposes the concept of assisted suicide” but “removed its formal opposition to the bill.”

Yet this attempt at a compromise position has left many palliative doctors unsatisfied. Among those supportive of assisted suicide, some have argued that all patients should have a right to avoid discomfort at the end of life — an objective even diligent palliative care cannot always meet.

Others, arguing against the practice, insisted that affirmatively ending patients’ lives was an unnecessary and crude response to the discomfort of death and dying. Newport Beach doctor Vincent Nguyen told Southern California Public Radio that patients’ typical fears — “about pain, losing control or being a burden on family — can be managed with spiritual and emotional counseling and pain medications, all of which are part of the palliative care toolkit.”

Dr. Ira Byock, a palliative care physician in Torrance, went further. Contrary to their wishes, he warned, the chronically ill often “spend their last weeks in intensive care units, hooked up to life support,” according to SCPR. “To address this problem, he says that all doctors — from medical students to veteran practitioners — should be required to have training in end of life conversations.”

A moral shift

As SB128 came one step closer to becoming law, analysts began a closer look at how much popular support the bill might attract. As has long been the case on high-profile and hot-button issues, California has been seen as a bellwether in the struggle over how the law treats those who want to die.

Despite gathering momentum to legalize assisted suicide, public opinion has remained split. But in-state and nationwide, data suggested an ongoing shift in mores that benefits how SB128 is perceived. “Nearly seven in 10 Americans (68 percent) say doctors should be legally allowed to assist terminally ill patients in committing suicide, up 10 percentage points from last year,” Gallup reported. “More broadly, support for euthanasia has risen nearly 20 points in the last two years and stands at the highest level in more than a decade.”

The shift has left opponents pivoting to warn that even relatively narrow authorizations of the practice would lead to ever-broader accommodations down the road. “In the Netherlands, after many years, legal assisted suicide for the dying has evolved into death on demand, with six out of 10 doctors admitting to killing a patient who was simply ‘tired of   living,'” wrote  Jacqueline Harvey of Euthanasia Prevention International at National Review. “California is approaching that slippery slope.”


Write a comment
  1. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 5 June, 2015, 08:13

    We’re tumbling down the slippery slope at light speed.
    Look for Medicare/Insurance paying for murder of patients, while simultaneously denying payments for treatment. SOYLENT GREEN at last!!!!*

    *Billionaires and political/cultural elites will still be offered the full menu of treatment options in the brave new compassionate world……

    Reply this comment
    • only1
      only1 7 June, 2015, 22:12

      hey bill thats a scary but probably a real possibility thats a carzy thought

      Reply this comment
  2. californianative
    californianative 5 June, 2015, 17:29

    The ” rules ” only apply to the ” little people”. Steve Jobs and his ilk jump to the front of the line when they want advanced medical technology.

    Reply this comment
  3. mteresa
    mteresa 5 June, 2015, 18:58

    Hey all. I am with all the dead….irony. If you are sick and want to kill yourself, that is ok. If you are condemned to die, because you murdered someone and ate them, no , you can’t kill yourself, that isn’t ok. If you are a fetus, and your mother says, stick a fork in you..I need to watch TV, not to read to you, you little jerk, hey, that is ok too.

    Reply this comment
  4. Teddy Baby MD
    Teddy Baby MD 7 June, 2015, 09:49

    I thought you conservatives were predicting that President O was going to start executing sick folks through his “death panels”? LMAO

    I guess your hissy fit was wrong….

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 10 June, 2015, 07:35

      There may be a silver lining in all this, when the RAGWUS feeders pensions are cut they will have a conduit for their pain!! 🙂

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Judge rebuffs AG Harris on donor disclosures

  California Attorney General Kamala Harris lost a high-profile lawsuit over her attempt to obtain donor records from an organization in

The Attack on Seniors

SEPT. 21, 2010 by KATY GRIMES This op ed originally appeared in The Sacramento Business Journal Sept. 17, 2010. On

Feinstein attacks environmentalists on drought

  On May 15, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., didn’t pull any punches about her recent attempt to push her drought bill through