High-profile CA judge trashes legal system

kozinskiAlex Kozinski, the libertarian maverick judge on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is one of the best-known judges in the nation in media and legal circles because of his contrarian streak and his willingness to go his own way. These traits are on display once again in a long essay for the Georgetown University Law Journal that amounts to a harsh condemnation of many of the key presumptions of the U.S. legal system and the behavior of police and prosecutors. Here are the highlights:

Prosecutorial misconduct is disturbingly common:

“… there are disturbing indications that a non-trivial number of prosecutors —and sometimes entire prosecutorial offices — engage in misconduct that seriously undermines the fairness of criminal trials. The misconduct ranges from misleading the jury, to outright lying in court and tacitly acquiescing or actively participating in the presentation of false evidence by police. …

 

“[P]rosecutors cannot be held liable, no matter how badly they misbehave, for actions such as withholding exculpatory evidence, introducing fabricated evidence, knowingly presenting perjured testimony and bringing charges for which there is no credible evidence. All are immune from liability. A defense lawyer who did any such things (or their equivalents) would soon find himself disbarred and playing house with Bubba.”

Common assumptions are not true:

“[R]esearch shows that eyewitness identifications are highly unreliable, especially where the witness and the perpetrator are of different races. Eyewitness reliability is further compromised when the identification occurs under the stress of a violent crime, an accident or catastrophic event—which pretty much covers all situations where identity is in dispute at trial.

 

“In fact, mistaken eyewitness testimony was a factor in more than a third of wrongful conviction cases. Yet, courts have been slow in allowing defendants to present expert evidence on the fallibility of eyewitnesses; many courts still don’t allow it. Few, if any, courts instruct juries on the pitfalls of eyewitness identification or caution them to be skeptical of eyewitness testimony. …

 

Innocent people do confess with surprising regularity. Harsh interrogation tactics, a variant of Stockholm syndrome, the desire to end the ordeal, emotional and financial exhaustion, family considerations and the youth or feeble-mindedness of the suspect can result in remarkably detailed confessions that are later shown to be utterly false.”

Police have ample ways to stack the deck:

“Police investigators have vast discretion about what leads to pursue, which witnesses to interview, what forensic tests to conduct and countless other aspects of the investigation. Police also have a unique opportunity to manufacture or destroy evidence, influence witnesses, extract confessions and otherwise direct the investigation so as to stack the deck against people they believe should be convicted. And not just small-town police in Podunk or Timbuktu. Just the other day, ‘[t]he Justice Department and FBI formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all [of the 268] trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.’

 

“Do they offer a class at Quantico called ‘Fudging Your Results To Get A Conviction’ or ‘Lying On The Stand 101’? How can you trust the professionalism and objectivity of police anywhere after an admission like that?

No evidence long prison sentences make sense:

“We are committed to a system of harsh sentencing because we believe that long sentences deter crime and, in any event, incapacitate criminals from victimizing the general population while they are in prison. And, indeed, the United States is enjoying an all-time low in violent crime rates, which would seem to support this intuition. But crime rates have been dropping steadily since the 1990s, and not merely in the United States but throughout the industrialized world. Our intuition about harsh sentences deterring crime may thus be misguided. We may be spending scarce taxpayer dollars maintaining the largest prison population in the industrialized world, shattering countless lives and families, for no good reason. …

 

“By any measure, the United States leads the world in incarceration. In absolute terms, it has more prisoners than any other country. With just 5 percent of the world’s population, we have almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners. China, with nearly 20 percent of the world’s population, has 16 percent of the world’s prisoners. Incarceration rates were not always this high in the United States. For the first three-quarters of the twentieth century, the rate was well under 250 per 100,000.88 Then, starting around 1980, incarceration rates started rising sharply with the advent of the war on drugs, mandatory minimum sentences and three-strikes laws.

 

“The difference in incarceration rates cannot be explained by higher crime rates in the United States. Crime rates here are roughly equivalent to Canada and in many categories lower than other countries. And the crime rate has been dropping in the United States, as in many other industrialized nations. Yet, U.S. sentences are vastly, shockingly longer than just about anywhere else in the world.

Law enforcement as an industry, manufacturing convictions

dershowitzKozinski’s critique is similar to that long offered by Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who has written for decades about how rampant police perjury — known as “testilying” — has turned the criminal-justice system into a factory where the product is convicts.

Kozinski’s Georgetown piece concludes with several proposed reforms, in particular allowing jurors to directly, personally review evidence and to talk among themselves to try to build a more thorough, rational basis for their decisions on guilt and innocence. But he also touches on the key issue in the massive Orange County scandal that’s now unfolding over the District Attorney’s Office’s questionable use of jailhouse informants:

“In response to a devastating report on jailhouse informants issued by the Los Angeles County grand jury in 1990, the county adopted procedures that required the approval of a committee before informants could be used. The use of informants consequently plummeted.

 

“Even still, the practice of using jailhouse informants as a means of detecting and perhaps manufacturing incriminatory evidence has continued in California. Serial informants are exceedingly dangerous because they have strong incentives to lie or embellish, they have learned to be persuasive to juries and there is no way to verify whether what they say is true. A man jailed on suspicion of a crime should not be subjected to the risk that someone with whom he is forced to share space will try for a get-out-of-jail-free card by manufacturing a confession.”

National Review had a recent cover story on the Orange County scandal, with the headline, “When District Attorneys Attack.”

9 comments

Write a comment
  1. Truthnik
    Truthnik 10 July, 2015, 13:23

    Perhaps this is due to decades of affirmative action advancing people in the law who do not yet have fully developed morals? Not that lawyers had fully developed morals before 1964!

    Reply this comment
  2. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 10 July, 2015, 14:23

    Excellent and disturbing article. You can thank our prison-industrial complex and burgeoning police state for the dreadful condition of Amerika’s injustice system.

    Every major class of government employed professionals involved in this disgraceful system are immune from liability for misconduct. Judges, prosecutors and cops are all members of the same conniving team of duplicitous schemers. They do what ever it takes to protect one another while preying on the rest of us for power, profit and ego gratification.

    A nation composed of informed and thoughtful citizens would express outrage and indignation at this disgusting tyranny. Instead we have sheeple, placidly grazing while their nation is turned into a gulag run by thugs, crooks and megalomaniacs.

    Reply this comment
  3. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 10 July, 2015, 14:46

    Abusive DA’s of every political stripe have learned that the road to riches begins at the courthouse door. Career politicians as diverse as Dianne Fienstein and Chris Christie got their first whiff of real power in politically charged prosecutions (Christie being an especially outrageous example of abusive prosecutorial misconduct). If the public, egged on by a hysterical press, demands harsh sentencing and abusive prosecutions, so be it, but we could drain the swamp by imposing a moratorium on DA’s and AG’s running for office for say 5 years after leaving their prosecutorial jobs.

    Reply this comment
  4. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 11 July, 2015, 13:22

    Just read and watch 9th Circuit case 13-56132 Baca v. Adams;

    “…epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct…”

    For your viewing pleasure ( skip straight to 18:21)

    Reply this comment
  5. Torkay Munklestien
    Torkay Munklestien 11 July, 2015, 17:23

    You people would complain if they hung ya with a new rope.

    Reply this comment
  6. Robert
    Robert 12 July, 2015, 09:00

    I am a veteran police officer and the judge is 100% right. I have seen arrest warrants and search warrants signed by judges that should have never been signed. I recently seen an arrest warrant authored by one officer and then signed and sworn by another officer. The kicker is both police officers had zero knowledge of the criminal case and the “facts” used to establish probable cause was all wrong. These police officers perjured themselves but did so under threat of insubordination by a militant commander. Why did they author, swear and sign an arrest warrant on a criminal case with ZERO knowledge because the case investigator was on vacation and could not be reached. The commander ordered an arrest of the alleged suspect. The alleged suspect was falsely arrested to make a point of the commander’s authority. The criminal case the suspect was arrested on was dismissed for lack evidence. There was NO evidence the suspect committed the crime but he spent time in jail.

    Reply this comment
  7. Brooklyn
    Brooklyn 13 July, 2015, 11:24

    I have read all of comments and editorials which included police and judges accounts of corruption within our “Legal Systems”.

    We know these unfortunate cases exist, but what about the groups of
    Police, DA’s etc. who are legitimate contenders for truth and honesty? Are they to be ignored and grouped in with liars?

    What about our “Robed” black gowned respected judiciary? Are they not certified liars as well. Maybe just the Conservative thinkers.

    If we conclude that Police, DA’s, ETC . are clueless robots, why have any authority at all. Why have jails or laws if they are always ignored, because everyone lies about the accused, especially the minorities.

    In conclusion, I guess nobody can be trusted by your measure of what the truth is because , the truth is how you want to see, not what it really means!

    Reply this comment
  8. Sailingme
    Sailingme 12 August, 2015, 15:50

    Great article. Please urge this judge to look at the dire mess in Family Law and Probate courts in Ca too.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Gadfly Radio broadcasts perspective on Anaheim riots, state schools

July 25, 2012 By John Seiler Check out Gadfly Radio’s latest broadcast. Featured first is Gustavo Arellano, ace reporter for

Duh Headline Of The Day

Steven Greenhut: The front page of the LAT Extra section of the Los Angeles Times featured the “dog bites man”

Government Motors cancels anti-Prop. 39 ads

Sept. 30, 2012 By John Seiler Surprise! The government-run company decided not to challenge the government tax increase. Government Motors,