Californians slash water use by 27.3 percent in June

Californians slash water use by 27.3 percent in June

sprinklerMotivated by a fourth year of drought — and mandatory water cuts — Californians reduced urban water use by 27.3 percent in June, compared with the same month two years ago, the state reported on Thursday.

The results are the first since state-ordered water cuts went into effect June 1. They exceeded the 25 percent conservation target mandated by Gov. Jerry Brown in April.

“Californians understand the severity of the drought and they are taking action, as shown by the numbers released today,” Felicia Marcus, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board, said in a news release. “We didn’t know if the positive showing in May was due in part to cooler temperatures. This report shows that residents knew they had to keep conserving even during the summer heat and they kept the sprinklers off more than they would in a normal year. That’s the right attitude as we head into August and September heat — in the drought of the century with no certain end date.”

The state required cities and towns to slash water use between 8 percent and 36 percent starting June 1, after voluntary measures came up short. It was the first mandated water cutback in California’s history.

Even before the state released its figures, water agencies from San Francisco to San Diego said they met or exceeded their June savings targets.

The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, California’s largest agency serving 4 million people, said it met its 16 percent savings goal.

San Diegans cut water use by about 26 percent in June, following a 30 percent drop in May, which was aided by cool and wet weather, the region’s water authority reported.

The San Jose Water Co. said its customers cut consumption by 35 percent in June, compared to the 20 percent goal.

State regulators put the water cuts in place after Gov. Jerry Brown ordered a 25 percent statewide water reduction mandate in April.

Districts with the highest per capita water use received the steepest reduction orders.

June’s water reductions follow a 28.9 percent drop in May. Californians reduced water in April by only 14 percent and 3.6 percent in March, leading up to the mandatory cuts.

Water districts that don’t meet the state mandates face the prospect of $10,000 per day fines, though the state panel has emphasized its goal is conservation, not fines. Districts could also face additional limits on how many days a week residents can water lawns.

Lake MeadTo the frustration of some city dwellers, conservation orders do not apply to the state’s agriculture industry or environmental water use. Both sectors use far more water than urban areas, though each has experienced severe cutbacks.

State officials stressed that Californians must keep saving water.

“We’re not just in a drought. We’re in the drought of our lives,” said Felicia Marcus, chair of the State Water Resources Control Board. “That’s why we are taking it seriously.”

Contact reporter Chris Nichols at [email protected] or on Twitter @ChrisTheJourno


Write a comment
  1. Dork
    Dork 30 July, 2015, 15:51

    Awesome, we saved 2 1/2 % of the total amount of water we collect in Man Made reservoirs,dams,canals,streams,delta,….

    50% still goes down the drain to save a NON NATIVE species known as the delta smelt!

    Reply this comment
  2. hello kitty
    hello kitty 2 August, 2015, 11:56

    planning dept. health and safety codes should be designed
    for waterless/soil producing toilets and grey water storage,irrigation
    and fuel cell fuel.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Bill Language To Change

After reading my story about AB 978, the bill proposing to streamline the business permitting process only for California businesses

Arnold's greed

Arnold can’t leave office soon enough. Today he blasted as “greedy” oil companies Valero and Tesoro, which are funding the

San Bernardino attacks shape presidential race

Presidential candidates in both parties have found challenges and opportunities in responding politically to the recent terrorist attacks in San