Restive Democrats cautioned on budget surplus

budget financeA new report by the Legislative Analyst’s Office prepared the ground for fresh political combat in Sacramento over what to do with California’s budgetary surplus. Although “much of the predicted surpluses” could be skimmed off “for serious emergencies,” the San Francisco Chronicle noted, “there will still be billions left up for grabs or further savings.”

But the report injected a significant note of caution into the coming debate, reminding policymakers that the Golden State’s recent nightmarish fiscal straits still could return if the country’s economic health sours anew. “Although the Legislative Analyst’s Office doesn’t predict that another economic downturn is imminent, the report analyzed how easily the state budget could absorb the impact of another recession and found that the state is still vulnerable to budget deficits,” observed the San Jose Mercury News. “A sizable reserve is the key to making it through the next economic downturn with minimal disruption to public programs,” the report concluded, according to the paper.

Familiar battle lines

Neither party’s priorities — nor Gov. Jerry Brown’s — have changed since the last time budget wrangling began in earnest. In a statement, Department of Finance director Michael Cohen played down the idea that the relative windfall should open the door to big new spending initiatives. “The strong economy is good news for California, but the recession scenario outlined by the Legislative Analyst is a sobering reminder that we must continue to pursue fiscal discipline, pay down liabilities, and build up our Rainy Day Fund during these fleeting good times,” he said, according to the Sacramento Bee. Brown’s next budget proposal was due to arrive in January.

Meanwhile, Hoover Institution fellow Bill Whalen suggested that “both parties likely will go along with expanding services for the developmentally disabled and restoring payments to doctors with Medi-Cal caseloads. … Chances are that Democrats will take another run at Gov. Jerry Brown over a big-ticket prize such as universal preschool. Meanwhile, Republicans will want to cut taxes.”

Unions to the fore

As the parties drew up their battle lines, however, California’s politically active unions already pressed ahead with a strategy designed to increase taxes by bypassing Sacramento entirely. “A proposed ballot measure to continue the so-called temporary tax hike 12 years beyond its scheduled Dec. 31, 2018, cutoff was cleared by the secretary of state for signature collection,” George Skelton confirmed at the Los Angeles Times. “The initiative’s sponsors are the California Teachers Assn. and the state Services Employees International Union. The teachers union contends that $50 billion in education cuts will never be made up, that inflation-adjusted funding still is $1 billion under the 2007 level and that K-12 spending, when factoring in California’s high cost of living, ranks 42nd in the nation.”

What’s more, however, one service employees’ chapter has linked up with the California Hospital Association and the California Medical Association in a rival effort to “extend the higher income tax rates permanently,” Skelton added. “It could be a political disaster to have two competing tax hikes on the ballot. So the two sides are negotiating in an effort to create one compromise proposal.”

Taxing cigarettes

Complicating the campaign season still further, a separate effort to raise taxes by $2 per pack of cigarettes — including electronic cigarettes or vapes — has drawn the support of unions including the California State Council of Service Employees, which ponied up $2 million. Tom Steyer, the billionaire Democratic donor and former hedge fund manager, also offered $1 million of his own money, according to the Sacramento Bee. “An alliance of public health, labor and health care groups has pushed the tax increase as a tool to reduce smoking rates and to better fund Medi-Cal, California’s low-income insurance program. Revenue from the tax hike could fund higher reimbursement rates for doctors who see Medi-Cal patients,” the Bee noted.

In familiar language, critics hit back, charging that the proposed increase would actually fall most heavily on the less well-off. The pack tax “largely would fund programs for the poor; yet the poor would pay for the programs because they form the largest group of smokers,” wrote the Orange County Register’s editorial board. “It would raise up to $1.3 billion a year. But as we always warn, boosting cigarette taxes also would increase the black market, which especially afflicts the poor.”

13 comments

Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 28 November, 2015, 10:49

    “A proposed ballot measure to continue the so-called temporary tax hike 12 years beyond its scheduled Dec. 31, 2018, cutoff was cleared by the secretary of state for signature collection,” … “The initiative’s sponsors are the California Teachers Assn. and the state Services Employees International Union. “
    No such thing as a “temporary tax” anywhere in CA.

    Reply this comment
    • SeeSaw
      SeeSaw 28 November, 2015, 14:03

      The temporary taxes enacted just before GAS termed out expired before Brown’s new term in 2010. All temporary taxes expire unless there is a new law to extend them. The current tax enacted with Prop. 30 cost me about a penny on my Wendy’s chili. It would probably kill me if it were to be extended.

      Reply this comment
      • bob
        bob 28 November, 2015, 16:15

        Sawhorse, where ya been old girl?

        You will be happy to know that Desmond has been filling in admirably for you.

        And that tax, what about the cumulative effect on all the things someone buys over years and in a state that already has one of the highest sales taxes in the country.

        And the thing is that making Brown’s tax increases permanent won’t be near enough for all the money the Demoncrats plan on spending.

        Plus lets not forgot all the unfunded pension liabilities. You will work poor Desmond into the grave paying for your pension.

        Reply this comment
        • SeeSaw
          SeeSaw 28 November, 2015, 19:32

          There will never be enough money. The question is, “what is it costing you personally” over the course of a stated period of time–a year perhaps? I have never met up with another commenter who will answer that question for me. CA’s overall taxes are not the highest in the country–I have seen numbers ranging from 12th to 17th. The combined gross income of me and my spouse is whittled down by $30,000 resulting in a state income tax liability that is very low, considering the state’s responsibility for providing services to 39 million inhabitants.

          Reply this comment
          • SeeSaw
            SeeSaw 28 November, 2015, 19:35

            I should have clarified–the state does not tax my spouse’s SS income; and, as we are both over 65, we also get a larger standard deduction and double personal credits.

      • Rex the Wonder Dog!
        Rex the Wonder Dog! 28 November, 2015, 20:52

        All temporary taxes expire unless there is a new law to extend them.
        And if they are EXTENDED they are NOT temporary. Like I said. Logic seesaw, logic, you can do it if you try.

        BTW, where you been at, the natives have missed you 😉

        Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 28 November, 2015, 16:39

    A new report by the Legislative Analyst’s Office prepared the ground for fresh political combat in Sacramento over what to do with California’s budgetary surplus. Although “much of the predicted surpluses” could be skimmed off “for serious emergencies,” the San Francisco Chronicle noted, “there will still be billions left up for grabs or further savings.”

    How about giving the surplus back to the beleaguered tax payers, taxpayers who pay the highest tax rates in the country? Bwahhhaaaaaa!

    When factor in the unfunded pension liabilities there is no surplus.

    Either way, the Demoncrats will spend every penny of that surplus and more and then they will demand more and higher taxes.

    Thanks, Demonrats!

    Reply this comment
  3. desmond
    desmond 29 November, 2015, 04:31

    One has to wonder what Mr. SeeSaw is doing. Suspect life is memorizing Lenin and Mao to avoid beatings with frying pan, and pruning with the cleaver to keep what fingers and toes he has left. The wiener has long been preserved in the mason jar above the fireplace.

    Reply this comment
  4. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 29 November, 2015, 08:02

    Saw

    Your intelligence baffles the trolls……

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Immigration reform all but dead for 2013 and 2014

Shocked by their poor showing in the 2012 presidential election, Republicans looked for ways to change their brand. The first

Video: Election watch: Props. 30 & 38

Oct. 9, 2012 Both California Governor Jerry Brown and the Teacher’s union put a tax hikes on the ballot. What

Taste Makes Waste

JUNE 23, 2010 By KATY GRIMES An “Instructional tasting event” does not sound very inviting, but offer a free taste