Years after CalWatchdog investigation, bill to end sub-minimum wage advances

minimum wage raiseMore than 2 million workers in California are celebrating the new year’s bump in the minimum wage.

Effective January 1, the state’s minimum wage increased from $9 to $10 an hour. But, not all workers in the state benefited from that minimum wage increase.

It’s legal in California to pay some workers less than the minimum wage. As has reported for years, a Depression-era loophole in federal law, Section 14 (c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, allows employers to obtain a special wage certificate to pay workers with disabilities less than the minimum wage.

Critics say that the law allows for the legal exploitation of people with disabilities, creates a separate system of worker rights for the disabled and is “humiliating,” “degrading” and makes people with disabilities feel like “second-class citizens.”

A 2012 investigation first reported that five California-based Goodwill charities used the special wage certificate program to pay hundreds of employees less than minimum wage, while also providing lucrative compensation packages to top executives.

“Anyone who believes that all work is dignified and all workers deserve fair treatment, has to be outraged by these practices,” Lorena Gonzalez, then secretary-treasurer of the San Diego-Imperial Counties Labor Council, told in 2012.

Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez leads on minimum wage equity

Gonzalez_headshotNow a member of the state Legislature, Gonzalez is doing something about that injustice — by advancing legislation that would end the practice completely in California.

Assembly Bill 488 would eliminate an exemption for employees of sheltered workshops and rehabilitation centers with special minimum wage licenses under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, extending the law’s protections against discrimination and harassment to workers in those environments.

“This bill guarantees these employees the same civil rights that all other workers, including interns, already receive,” Gonzalez said. “There’s no reason these workers should receive less protection from discrimination or harassment on the job.”

On Wednesday, the Assembly Committee on Labor and Employment passed AB488 on a 5-0 vote. Republican Assemblyman Matthew Harper of Huntington Beach joined Democratic Assembly members Roger Hernández of West Covina, Evan Low of Campbell, Kevin McCarty of San Diego, and Tony Thurmond of Richmond in backing the bill.

Goodwill Industries: Biggest Name in Special Wage Program

In recent years, Goodwill Industries has become the poster-child for exploitation of workers with disabilities. More than 100 Goodwill entities nationwide have employed workers through the Special Wage Certificate program. A 2013 investigation revealed that these same Goodwill entities that use the special wage program simultaneously spent $53.7 million in total executive compensation.

“Section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act authorizes employers, after receiving a certificate from the Wage and Hour Division, to pay special minimum wages — wages less than the Federal minimum wage — to workers who have disabilities for the work being performed,” the Department of Labor explains on its website.

Goodwill justifies the practice as a tool to hire people with severe disabilities, who would otherwise be unable to find work. Other supporters of the special wage certificate program contend that people with disabilities are not as productive as able-bodied individuals.

However, labor experts dispute those claims. Samuel R. Bagenstos, a professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School and a former deputy attorney general for civil rights, has detailed numerous examples of how workshop employers automatically assigned jobs “without any connection to the abilities and background of the individuals.”

In 2014, Gonzalez and State Senator Ben Hueso introduced Assembly Joint Resolution 36 to increase pressure on Congress to repeal the Depression-era law.


Write a comment
  1. Richard Rider
    Richard Rider 8 January, 2016, 08:58

    Like all government programs, this subminimum wage “loophole” can be abused. But eliminating this program means that people with REAL disabilities that reduce their productivity will find employment harder to find.

    Walmart hires disabled people to fill some slots. My experience is that they are less productive — working slower — and cannot help customers as much with questions.

    I’ve always been an admirer of Walmart’s attempts to put such folks into jobs they can do. To raise these “challenged” employees’ pay to $15 an hour means that it’s more probable they might lose their jobs. MORE likely is that Walmart simply won’t hire such disabled people in the future.

    But the feel-good proponents of this “reform” don’t care about who DOESN’T get hired — the unseen victims of their meddling in market pricing. And the press will never connect the dots.

    Reply this comment
    • Rufus44
      Rufus44 16 January, 2016, 16:33

      You’re arguing with assumptions and opinions. Lame. Cost of living doesn’t change for workers with disabilities. And no matter how you spin it, $15/hr is not much money for living in most populated areas of CA.

      Reply this comment
      • Rex the Wonder Dog!
        Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 January, 2016, 19:10

        $15 an hour is $30LK per year, which is %$1K MORE than this states per capita annual income.

        Reply this comment
      • Bean
        Bean 19 June, 2017, 18:38

        Seems as though your argument is uneducated and unrealistic. In as many cases as I know of, disabled workers that qualify for subminimum wage do not live alone and also receive funds sufficient for quality living from the government. Subminimum wage allows this population to be an active part of their community and receive earnings that match their capability and productivity all the while remaining eligible to continue to receive financial aid.

        Reply this comment
  2. Billy the man from G.O.R.E.
    Billy the man from G.O.R.E. 11 January, 2016, 16:18

    Good on you, Lorena! ‘Sub-minimum’ wages are the CLASSIC american screw-job, and we wonder why no one works anymore. Sweat shops for the disabled and prisoners are so skin-crawlingly EVIL, and big american business absolutely LOVES it. The business culture of this country hasn’t really evolved much since the 1820’s: if they ’employ’ you they think they own you. We inherited this disgusting attitude from the english, where every business owner feels entitled to cheap or free labor. The german/swiss/austrian model is much better: a LIVING WAGE for a workforce that is highly trained and educated. The world WILL beat a path to your door for the quality. It is called the ‘value added proposition’ versus the ‘quantity production proposition’ and it always wins, even in food production.

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 January, 2016, 19:11

    Lorena Gonzalez has been a public employee apologist her entire life…

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CA Democratic Convention: Marginalized group challenges party to stand for “health choice”

At this weekend’s state party convention, California Democrats went out of their way to acknowledge marginalized groups and affirm their

Big UC changes may come from private ‘Committee of Two’ meetings 

Ironically, in the midst of Sunshine Week, designed to create more open government and freedom of information, the “Committee of

CA GOP moderates immigration tone

Hoping to satisfy restive constituents without handing Democrats a cudgel, the California Republican Party made moves designed to project a