Gov. Brown shakes up CA Dems on preschool

PreschoolCalifornia Democrats have been put back on their heels once again by Gov. Jerry Brown, whose approach to preschool education has departed from party orthodoxy.

“Brown wants to combine three state-funded early education programs, strip their requirements and let each local school district decide how to best spend the money,” Capital Public Radio reported. “But there’s a catch: districts must prioritize low-income and at-risk four-year-olds.”

Michael Cohen, Brown’s finance director, told CPR that negotiations over the details will happen at the right time. “It’s important to set up the structure and get consensus on what the program will look like,” he said. “And then at that point, it will become an annual budget decision about what amount of funding makes sense.”

Continued conflict

The disagreement deepens a conflict that intensified among California Democrats late last year. In October, Brown gave his left wing fits when he shot down a big preschool bill that had even drawn support from some Sacramento Republicans. “The Preschool for All Act (AB47), authored by Assemblyman Kevin McCarty, D-Sacramento, passed with bipartisan support, but failed to get backing from Brown,” as EdSource reported at the time. “The bill would have set a deadline of June 30, 2018 for granting all low-income 4-year-olds access to transitional kindergarten or state preschool. It was meant to firm up a promise made in last year’s legislation (SB837) that set the eventual goal of providing pre-kindergarten schooling for all low-income 4-year-olds. Because of that previous commitment, Brown said in his veto message that the bill was unnecessary and that future preschool funding should be addressed in the budget-setting process.”

Contrary to Brown’s wishes, the bill merely presumed that future funding would materialize in the years to come. To his irritation, estimates of its total cost “varied greatly, ranging between $147 million and $240 million, depending on how many children are placed in full-day vs. half-day programs,” as EdSource added.

A two-front battle

But Brown’s adversaries got their revenge when he released his latest budget. As the Washington Post reported, Chris Hoene, executive director of the California Budget & Policy Center called the budget a “missed opportunity to use the state’s strong revenues to boost key public investments that help individuals and families advance, such as child care and preschool, welfare-to-work services, affordable housing, and higher education.” At the same time, the Post noted, the California branch of the Children’s Defense Fund said Brown was “using the threat of future recession to justify not making critical investments of our most vulnerable children today.”

The governor’s block grant proposal, which would allocate over a billion and a half dollars to early learning, aggrieved activists who have demanded that the state use its recent surpluses to restore education spending to pre-Great Recession levels. “During the recession the state cut early education by over $1 billion, which amounted to almost 100,000 lost preschool seats. In recent budget years some of those cuts have been restored, but spending on early care is nowhere near 2008 levels when the budget was about $3.2 billion,” as Southern California Public Radio noted.

Meanwhile, however, Brown also incurred the wrath of education reformers, including some fellow Democrats, who have grown increasingly frustrated with the inability of the state’s teachers unions to deliver a satisfactory level of education to all students enrolled in public schools. “As Democrats pull back from holding educators accountable for results, they risk alienating old allies as well,” UC Berkeley education professor Bruce Fuller wrote in the Sacramento Bee. “California parents lost a tool this month when Gov. Jerry Brown trashed a well-known achievement index, pleasing union chiefs while infuriating civil rights advocates who can no longer pinpoint listless campuses.”

9 comments

Write a comment
  1. Dude
    Dude 24 January, 2016, 10:25

    “But there’s a catch: districts must prioritize low-income and at-risk four-year-olds.”

    Liberal-speak for “Money must go to non-white children and preferably non-citizens”

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 24 January, 2016, 10:34

    Teddy Steals will be hurt very badly by this…his preschool education has already suffered tremendously the last 8 years 😉

    Reply this comment
    • Ulysses Uhaul
      Ulysses Uhaul 24 January, 2016, 15:04

      Meds bro……you’re little white coat might be too tight too!

      Reply this comment
    • Ulysses Uhaul
      Ulysses Uhaul 24 January, 2016, 15:05

      Meds bro……your little white coat might be too tight too!

      Reply this comment
      • Rex the Wonder Dog!
        Rex the Wonder Dog! 24 January, 2016, 21:46

        your ; [yoo r, yawr, yohr; unstressed yer]; pronoun; (a form of the possessive case of you used as an attributive adjective): Your jacket is in that closet. I do NOT like your idea Uass.

        you’re [yoo r; unstressed yer]; contraction of you are :
        You’re certain that’s right? You’re an IDIOT Uass

        🙂

        Too easy, like taking candy from a Teddy…errrr…baby!

        Reply this comment
  3. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 24 January, 2016, 12:31

    Why are we funding preschool when we don’t have enough funding for K-12?

    Reply this comment
  4. CommentAndGo
    CommentAndGo 24 January, 2016, 14:08

    More leftie smoke rings from Brown. All children must be treated equally. Then assuming that is being done, address all other needs on a priority basis.

    Reply this comment
  5. SmartMike
    SmartMike 24 January, 2016, 18:08

    The kids can be members of a union at age 4. They can retire after 30 years in union(dues to be paid by private sector)with same pension as their highest paid teacher. Beats the formula on the east coast. Yea..we will show them.

    Reply this comment
  6. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 25 January, 2016, 07:04

    See moonbeam,see moonbeam run,moonbeam can run,see demacrat,see moonbeam see moonbeam and demacrat run over cliff together

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Legislator warns against lawsuit abuse

When California’s Republican legislators warn that high taxes, onerous regulations and frivolous lawsuits are driving businesses out of California, they

Voters skeptical of major tax system overhaul 

  While much attention has been paid to potential tax measures on the 2016 ballot, working in the background is

Driving K-12 scams: push to preserve automatic teacher raises

Feb. 12, 2013 By Chris Reed The state Senate committee report last week showing districts stealing federal funds meant for