Gov. Brown’s stance on Prop. 30 tax extension still in limbo

Prop. 30Gov. Jerry Brown’s tune keeps changing when it comes to Proposition 30, the successful 2012 ballot measure that raised the state’s basic sales tax until the end of 2016 and income taxes on the wealthy until the end of 2018. His relative silence about a well-funded union-backed effort to extend the income tax hikes until 2030 with a November ballot measure is at odds with most of his history.

In 2012, Brown and other measure backers repeatedly stressed that the tax hikes were temporary. He dismissed critics who said this promise was being made insincerely and his support was seen as crucial to persuading 55 percent of voters to approve the tax increases.

But as soon as the campaign was won, the big players behind Prop. 30 — the California Teachers Union and the California Federation of Teachers, as well as other government unions — indicated that it was an open question whether they would try to extend the increase in either or both taxes.

According to a Nexis search, it was in January 2014 — 14 months after Prop. 30 passed — when behind-the-scenes talk about an extension became public. That’s when state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, long closely allied with the CTA and CFT, said extensions were needed. Four months later, state Sen. Mark Leno, D-San Francisco, spoke at a hometown rally in favor of more budget dollars for schools and social programs. Leno said extending Prop. 30 made sense because the state’s needs wouldn’t go away when the taxes expired.

After the rally, he told the San Francisco Chronicle, “The state of California will be in sad shape if the money sunsets and there’s no replacement for it.” The Chronicle framed Leno’s statement as putting “him on a collision course with the governor, who used the fixed time limit as a selling point for the measure.”

The same article introduced some telling nuance into Brown’s position. An aide told the Chronicle that the governor “has said that if the state is going to increase taxes, the people will have to vote for it” — reframing his 2012 promise as less than absolute.

Budget revenue rhetoric hinted at fight ahead

But in May 2015, Brown appeared to be returning to his hard line — temporary meant temporary. That month, the state’s Department of Finance put out a revised 2015-16 state budget that seemed to explicitly foreshadow Brown’s opposition to an extension of either or both tax hikes.

The San Jose Mercury News reported that “tucked away on one of the final pages of the 104-page summary of the spending plan was a surprising revelation: Not only will the budget survive when Proposition 30’s temporary taxes are phased out, but general fund revenues are also expected to continue climbing.”

Why would Brown’s budget plan explicitly make this point? To political observers, it felt like a “shots fired” moment.

“Politicians sometimes find themselves in strange positions when the lines of battle shift — and clearly this is one of those times,” Bill Whalen of Stanford’s Hoover Institution told the Mercury News.

It may have seemed clear then. But the expected fight never happened. Union consultants agreed to Brown’s demand that the extension of the Prop. 30 income tax hike — which affects single taxpayers making more than about $260,000 and joint filers making more than $520,000 — not be structured in a way that kept money out of a state rainy-day fund established by voters in 2014. His end of the deal seems to be mostly keeping quiet about the issue.

At a May 13 budget press conference, the governor again refused to decline or endorse the coming campaign to add 12 years to the “temporary” income tax hike. But he hinted at budget pain if it fails.

“If the tax doesn’t pass, we’ll manage. We will have cuts,” Brown said, according to the Sacramento Business Journal.


Write a comment
  1. Dude
    Dude 16 May, 2016, 12:58

    Hey, how doeS NO! sound? No extension to a tax that never should have been levied.

    Reply this comment
  2. JPR11
    JPR11 16 May, 2016, 16:22

    Every Pol in Sac must kneel to the Unions. So here we go again with another tax fix. The Tax season is in full swing for Nov. Prop 30 was suppose to benefit the classroom. Instead it went to pay down the unfunded teachers retirement fund. If you noticed, the justification is either schools or pot holes. When will we ever get a report on where the money went and what we got in return? Is that too much to ask?

    Total state spending has gone up over 35%, 2011 through 2015. Why are taxpayers nor screaming? Is it true more people are on the Pad then paying taxes? I’d say CA is out of control.

    Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 16 May, 2016, 16:56

    Settle down….no one cares about where or what……most residents pay little taxes and many work in gray market pursuits……

    Sick of doomers trying to save us from phantoms, conspiracies and legends….no one cares…get over it.

    Reply this comment
  4. Dude
    Dude 16 May, 2016, 17:14

    You’re a Dimtard that needs a math lesson. Gov. Jerry Brown signs new $167.6-billion state budget. Where do you think that comes from Einstein?

    Reply this comment
  5. Dude
    Dude 16 May, 2016, 17:20

    Gov. Jerry Brown signs new $167.6-billion state budget. Where do you think that money comes from you dolt. We need to say, NO! To all new taxes, and get a complete accounting for existing taxes.

    Reply this comment
  6. bob
    bob 16 May, 2016, 18:57

    His end of the deal seems to be mostly keeping quiet about the issue.

    So isn’t it obvious the Old Brown Buzzard is for the extension and never meant the tax increase (at least the income tax part) to be temporary?

    What part of temporary tax increase don’t you understand?

    Reply this comment
  7. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 16 May, 2016, 20:32

    Geesh…..foaming at the mouth……just pay your fair share…..or use our premier moving services……

    This month we have a special on Bang-la-deshie lamp and electronics packing boxes…..

    Reply this comment
  8. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 May, 2016, 22:48

    You’re a Dimtard that needs a math lesson. Gov. Jerry Brown signs new $167.6-billion state budget. Where do you think that comes from Einstein?
    Hahahaha……Ahaul and Teddy Dork are one and the same, “Dimtards”, they will never recover!

    Reply this comment
  9. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 17 May, 2016, 10:38


    Your corn dog dipping station is warming up….get back to your forever career position!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Tax agency gets special treatment

Nov. 1, 2012 Katy Grimes: Californians already know that the thousands of laws and regulations passed every year by the

Mother’s Market promotes Prop. 37 GMO labeling

Aug. 21, 2012 By John Seiler When shopping yesterday at the Huntington Beach health-food store Mother’s Market, which I’ve patronized

IRS attacks survivor of Japanese internment camp

May 23, 2013 By John Seiler How low did the IRS go in assaulting free Americans? About as low as