CA Democrats line up to back marijuana legalization


california-marijuanaThe executive board of the California Democratic Party has endorsed recreational marijuana, throwing its support behind the ballot measure that has won the support of Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Meeting recently in Long Beach, the board voted in favor of the Adult Use of Marijuana Act, which “would legalize holding up to an ounce of weed for those older than 21” without any medical allowance or qualification, LA Weekly observed. “If it passes, cannabis could be grown, produced and sold under strict regulations already headed for the medical marijuana market. And it would tax cultivation and sales at a rate of 15 percent.”

“The Dems join the ACLU, the NAACP of California and national NORML in endorsing AUMA. Last month the Los Angeles County Democratic Party, the nation’s largest local Democratic Party group, endorsed the initiative.”

On pot, many California Democrats have remained further to the left, or libertarian, than party leaders nationwide. Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., supported recreational marijuana in his home state as well as the Golden State. At a rally in San Jose, Sanders — “the only presidential candidate to call for descheduling marijuana under federal law,” as observed, told crowds, “If I lived in California, I would vote ‘yes’ to legalize marijuana.”

But even in California, many Democrats have been slow to move toward recreational marijuana. At a recent pro-legalization event, “Newsom reminded the audience that even though all of California’s elected statewide officials are Democrats, he is the only one that supports legalization,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported. “Newsom said that while polling has been strong in recent weeks, including a Public Policy Institute of California survey last month that found 60 percent support for legalization, there are rumors every day of a deep-pocketed donor popping up for the opposition.”

Quiet ambivalence

Recreational pot advocates have identified several minor issues where state Democrats’ interests have not fully aligned with those of the legalization movement. “There are only a few parts of the initiative that have Democrats worried — one being the potential for increase in accidents involving cannabis in the states of Colorado and Washington, who have both had legal marijuana programs running for a couple of years now,” according to Marijuana Times.

The day after she secured a first-place finish in the primary election to replace outgoing Sen. Barbara Boxer, Attorney General Kamala Harris specifically cited the safety issue in qualifying her stance on the ballot initiative. “I am not opposed to legalizing marijuana, but there are some details we need to figure out, including how we are going to test impairment when one is under the influence of marijuana,” she said, according to the Chronicle.

What’s more, as the Marijuana Times added, “individual cities and counties will have the option to opt out of the commercial end of legalization. By not allowing cannabis sales and cultivation, these areas will leave people legally allowed to possess cannabis but no way to purchase it without going to the next city or county over.” (In another sign of hesitance among top California Democrats, Sen. Dianne Feinstein chose not to side with the majority in a banking committee vote to approve banking access for the marijuana business. She was the only Democrat to do so, as noted.) 

California cities have also recognized the opportunity to add municipal taxes atop what the state will take from marijuana sales. In San Diego, City Councilman Mark Kersey led the council “toward placing a measure on the November ballot that would impose an 8 percent tax on gross receipts from recreational marijuana sales to pay for increased city costs, starting with police,” as U-T San Diego reported. “The council would be able to increase the tax as high as 15 percent but not tax medical marijuana sales.”


Write a comment
  1. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 30 June, 2016, 09:27

    And these are the same idiots who want all privatly owned guns confiscated STUPID MEMBERS OF THE STUPID JACKASS PARTY

    Reply this comment
    • SkippingDog
      SkippingDog 30 June, 2016, 22:08

      When was legislation proposed to confiscate all privately owned guns?

      Reply this comment
      • NannyState
        NannyState 2 July, 2016, 11:39

        They are starting with magazines (clips), which is part of the gun. Our crazy Govenor wants people to turn them in while not getting paid for them.

        He is also making it illegal to let your friends burrow a gun for a hunting trip.

        He is totally nuts!

        Reply this comment
  2. Farruk
    Farruk 2 July, 2016, 09:38

    If the assinine legislation becomes law, and most pundants predict it will pass, predictably there will be UNINTENDED consequences. In everything from impaired drivers to most everything NON drug culture folks do! The ‘pro pot’ arguments are VAST and very vocal. I know many who live in Oregon, Washington, and Colorado. Most do NOT like all the crap associated with dysfunctional druggies that ensues when they are in control. Kinda like the inmates being in charge of the asylum! “Scotty beam me up there is NO intelligent life here on this planet!”

    Reply this comment
  3. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 2 July, 2016, 14:06

    Moonbeam Brown still a narrow minded liberal demacratic Pinhead

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CA and feds take aim at hunting ammo

California is attempting to be the first state in the nation to kill wild game hunting. By prohibiting the use

FPPC on ‘dark money’ witch hunt

Just in time for Halloween, the Fair Political Practices Commission completed a modern-day witch-hunt last week, looking for “dark money.”

Prop 24: Fairness or Penalty?

SEPT. 30, 2010 By KATY GRIMES It’s not so unusual to hear people making disparaging comments about one another at