Report: Prop. 47 reduced recidivism, did not cause spike in violent crime

Despite debates over the wisdom of criminal justice reforms in recent years, Proposition 47 succeeded in reducing recidivism and did not cause a spike in violent crime, according a report released last week from the Public Policy Institute of California.

Nearly 60 percent of voters in 2014 approved Prop. 47, which recategorized certain low-level drug and property offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, in an attempt to ease prison overpopulation. 

Since then, many have attempted to link criminal justice reforms like Prop. 47 with a spike in crime in 2015 and 2016. There was even a failed ballot proposal earlier this year that would have rolled back some reforms.

The PPIC found that the two-year rearrest rate for those released after serving sentences for Prop. 47 offenses was almost two points lower than individuals released before the reforms. Meanwhile, the two-year reconviction rate was more than 3 percent lower.

However, the study cautioned that “it is too early to know” how effective Prop. 47’s redirection of funding toward treatment for offenders was.

The study found that much of the purported increase in violent crime post-Prop. 47 was the result of methodological factors, such as police departments in years prior under-reporting violent crimes or the FBI expanding the definition of sexual crimes. Meanwhile, upticks in violence were already starting in 2013 and early 2014, before reforms were enacted.

With property crime, however, the study concluded that Prop. 47 was in part to blame. “It may have contributed to a rise in larceny thefts, which increased by roughly 9 percent (about 135 more thefts per 100,000 residents) compared to other states,” the report read.

Finally, while several thousand inmates were released as a direct result of Prop. 47, the PPIC concluded its effect was more apparent in a shift by law enforcement from arresting potential offenders to citing and releasing them.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Leaving Soon
    Leaving Soon 19 June, 2018, 18:34

    Give me a break. Who wrote the report for them, Jerry Brown? What a load!

    Reply this comment
  2. Prophetfortheblind
    Prophetfortheblind 19 June, 2018, 23:45

    The real truth, regardless of another set of cooked up feel good news, in the area of California that I live. Thievery is at an all time high, wanna find out for yourself? Just park your vehicle with something of value in it. Go on vacation to find your house burglarized. These reports are like the polls, highly inaccurate sold as fact to Sheeple.

    Reply this comment
  3. Dallas
    Dallas 20 June, 2018, 09:08

    What a junk article. They talk about a 2% change but don’t say out of what % is normal.

    The author should be embarrassed for writing pure junk spin. We don’t even know how much the property crime rate has increased.

    Reply this comment
  4. Standing Fast
    Standing Fast 20 June, 2018, 11:39

    If you believe this article, I gotta bridge in Brooklyn that’s a really great deal for the right person.

    I hate to spoil CalWatchdog’s day, but some people really do belong behind bars no matter how crowded prisons might be or how much it costs taxpayers.

    California used to be a real Paradise for nearly everyone, now it is become a living hell for most of us.

    Liberty means responsibility, not license.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

<



Related Articles

Assembly budget secrecy ahead; 37 empty budget bills passed

May 14, 2013 By Katy Grimes SACRAMENTO — Another secretive budget is in the near future as Democrats passed 37

Trash train fiasco illustrates private vs. public double standard

This story in the Orange County Register illustrates a common CalWatchdog theme: In the private sector, incompetence leads to companies

CA water policy: Will House GOP demand more change?

The California water compromise reached by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-San Francisco, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, and inserted