Bill tightening police use of force rules passes committee

California legislators moved a step closer last week to tightening the rules governing police use of force. In the face of staunch opposition from law enforcement groups, the Senate Public Safety Committee voted 5-1 in favor of Assembly Bill 931 on June 19.

AB931 would limit the use of force to strictly a last resort, when officers have no other option to protect themselves or civilians.

Currently, police officers may use deadly force if their actions “are ‘objectively reasonable’ in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them.” This standard was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1989 in Graham v. Connor.

The bill was spurred by a spate of civilian deaths, particularly minorities, at the hands of police, with the killing of an unarmed Stephon Clark by Sacramento police officers in March in particular serving as the catalyst for legislative action.

“AB931 is about preventing unnecessary deaths by clarifying police use-of-force,” said Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego. “This bill is squarely in line with the best practices recognized by academics and best practices in the field.”

Additionally, Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, cited the need to protect communities of color.

The ACLU of California praised the development, tweeting, “We need the bill to address the policing crisis that has led to the deaths of far too many people.”

However, law enforcement groups, many of which have opposed the bill since its inception, will likely vigorously fight the bill’s passage. “We agree that more training can result in better outcomes, but there is a fundamental disagreement about raising the standards above what the Supreme Court has said,” one lobbyist for the California Police Chiefs Association told the Sacramento Bee.

AB931’s next test be the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. Dude McCool
    Dude McCool 26 June, 2018, 17:19

    So now the Demwit loons in Sacrilege California are neutering law enforcement for being too rough on murders, rapists and gang members. I guess with representatives like Mad Maxine Waters I shouldn’t be surprised

    Reply this comment
  2. Prophetfortheblind
    Prophetfortheblind 26 June, 2018, 21:55

    I have a great idea, let’s have every California Politician commit to a 40 hour ride along with each of these 3. #1. Law enforcement. #2 ER, #3. Ambulance. Make sure it happens in the worst areas of California. Then let’s see if they are still incoherent to reality.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

<


Tags assigned to this article:
policeShirley Webercriminal justiceSteve Bradford

Related Articles

Prop. 39 tax-hike $ also may indirectly boost teacher pay

March 7, 2013 By Chris Reed It’s not just money from Proposition 30’s sales-tax and income-tax hikes that is being

9th Circuit: California cities must let homeless sleep on streets

A ruling this month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which holds it is unconstitutional to ban homeless

Obama administration taps AP phone lines

May 14, 2013 By Katy Grimes The Associated Press found itself in an interesting juxtaposition yesterday when it had to