End Soviet-Style Kids Courts


The most heart-wrenching issues I’ve written about involved the state’s dependency court and foster-care systems. Officials have the power to remove children from their family homes and to place them in the care of strangers, yet the system that exercises these vast powers is veiled in secrecy and, therefore, off-limits to serious news coverage and oversight.

Fortunately, Assembly Bill 73, by Assemblyman Mike Feuer, D-Los Angeles, offers hope of fixing that system with a simple but time-tested approach: sunshine. His new legislation would make hearings in dependency court presumptively open, meaning that the public and media could cover the goings-on unless a judge finds good reason to close the proceedings.

Typically, I would hear from a distraught parent whose child had been taken into protective custody. Imagine the horror of such a situation. Often, the child would be taken by force as child-protective services officials would show up with armed deputies. In the world of CPS, the parent has no rights, and the child is taken away based mainly on the opinion of the social worker, who might start an investigation based on an anonymous tip. It’s a “guilty until proven innocent” system, based on the idea that if a child is in danger, that child must be removed from the home immediately.

Obviously, we all want children removed from abusive and dangerous situations, but government officials don’t always get it right. Many times, families are torn asunder based on unproven allegations and hearsay. The parents have no real standing in the court system and no real rights. The overburdened court system makes quick decisions that involve the fate of children and their families. Parents spend their life’s savings hiring attorneys and battling this impenetrable system.

America remains a remarkably free society, but there are parts of our society that are frighteningly totalitarian. This is one of them. In one case I wrote about, Russian immigrants watched as the authorities removed their autistic son from their home and placed him in one of those developmental institutions, where he was pumped full of drugs and kept away from his loving family. No one had ever accused the family of mistreating the boy, but the authorities decided that it would be better to treat him with drugs than in the drug-free manner preferred by the family.

I recall the parent telling me that the authorities would never touch your family in the Soviet Union. He was shocked that such a travesty could take place in America. In another case I wrote about, an 8-year-old girl was taken from the loving care of her grandmother and placed in the custody of a foster parent who had been accused of some rather bad behavior at his foster home. In yet another case, a social worker was credibly accused of committing fraud – by claiming that a child’s burn was the result of abuse rather than a household accident. It was extremely difficult getting any information about these situations. The approach from the authorities was clear: It was none of anybody’s business. No wonder so many parents live in fear.

On the other end of the spectrum, we’ve all read about children who are left in abusive homes and end up being brutally abused, even murdered. Many of the bigger CPS systems are bureaucratic nightmares. We’d like to think that the people who make these decisions operate with a Solomonic sense of justice, yet we know better given what we know about closed bureaucracies.

A recent San Jose Mercury News editorial supporting AB73 detailed the same problems: “Three years ago, Mercury News reporter Karen de Sá documented the troubled state of this system. Her yearlong investigation found that overwhelmed, undertrained lawyers weren’t properly representing their clients, that older children were too often excluded from proceedings affecting their lives, and that parents’ and children’s rights were routinely at risk.”

Year after year, we see attempts to increase funding or reform the system, yet nothing ever changes. This is not a money issue but, rather, a problem rooted in the nature of the system. Feuer’s bill could actually help. There’s nothing like sunshine to expose injustice and create a push for reform.


    (Page 3 of 3)

    Steven Greenhut: End totalitarianism in kids court

    March 11, 2011|By STEVEN GREENHUT

    Here is the bill summary: “Existing law provides that the public shall not be admitted to a juvenile court hearing in a dependency proceeding, unless requested by a parent or guardian and consented to or requested by the minor concerning whom the petition has been filed. Existing law permits the judge or referee to admit those persons as he or she deems to have a direct and legitimate interest in the particular case or the work of the court. This bill would express the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation to provide that juvenile court hearings in juvenile dependency cases shall be presumptively open to the public, unless the court finds that admitting the public would not be in a child’s best interest.”

    Feuer is still crafting the final measure and is considering a pilot program. Seventeen states have presumptively open dependency court hearings, and the results are good. One judge from Minnesota attended a recent hearing in Sacramento and testified about the value of an open system. We don’t need much testimony to know that openness is the preferred path in a free society.

    While legislators waste their time introducing bills designed to play to their partisan base, here’s someone who is looking to fix an actual problem. I don’t often agree with Feuer’s politics, but this is a stellar effort and proof that there can be areas of genuine bipartisanship. Possible resistance might come from unions, which generally prefer that their workers be able to do their jobs without much public input.

    We’ll see how it plays out, but let’s hope legislators from both sides of the aisle take the side of openness and reform.

    –Steven Greenhut

    No comments

    Write a comment
    1. cpssucks
      cpssucks 16 March, 2011, 20:41

      In Canada, there are “open” courts, where anyone is free to attend child protection proceedings. Yet, the injustices that occur here are probably just as bad, or worse, than the USA. And in Canada, you often can’t sue – or you cannot sue for any decent amount, so in that regard the USA is way ahead of us. Many people are unaware of the fact that Reena Virk would still be alive most likely if it had not been for CPS here. CPS needs to be abolished. The cops and other decent organizations like the Sally Ann or volunteers or relatives can look after the children. Keep them away from the perverts who get paid, often thousands of dollars, to ignore or abuse the children who have been ripped from good, decent, loving parents.

      It’s time to get rid of the corrupt judges. They need to be exposed for what they are. Heartless government mooches who couldn’t give a damn about children or families.

      Reply this comment
    2. GodsPlan4theChildren
      GodsPlan4theChildren 16 March, 2011, 23:12

      This is a start to address accountability. I want to know what about the thousands of parents whom lost their children due to the corruption of child services and the bias courts. Our children and families deserve remedy.

      Reply this comment
    3. Kathi
      Kathi 12 May, 2012, 06:52

      And yet here we sit, the bill was not passed and the Assemblymembers office has no interest in pursuing it. This is why Politicians are destroying our country. Congressman Baca did the same thing in holding his “special hearings” on CPS Abuse of Power. They all know it’s going on, yet put on the “show” that they care, then stand back and say “oh well, no one would agree to do anything”. REALLY??? And that means the problem has just went away? Of course not, it means that they could care less. After all, Govt is just destroying people’s lives, heck they’ve been doing that for a long time. The fact that they are using children to do it? I guess even that doesn’t move them.

      Reply this comment

    Write a Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Related Articles

    Irresponsible boycott bandwagon

    APRIL 30, 2010 The recent spate of political leaders in California calling for financial sanctions and boycotts of Arizona businesses,

    Lawsuit opposes excessive Coastal Commission restrictions

    March 8, 2013 By Dave Roberts One of the reasons many California businesses are struggling to survive or are leaving

    Michal Bloomberg’s candor beats Jerry Brown’s candor — by a mile

    Jack Dean of the invaluable pensiontsunami.com website sent me a Politicker story about departing New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s