Politician Spends Excessively!

Katy Grimes: Alert the media! A Sacramento politician spent record amounts of money while a county supervisor.

And now, that county supervisor is in the State Assembly.

An exposé done by the Sacramento Bee over the weekend is only two years late; this information might have been helpful for voters in November 2010, when they were trying to decide whether or not to elect Roger Dickinson, a Democrat, to the 9th Assembly district.

“In his last 30 months as a Sacramento County supervisor, Roger Dickinson spent almost $70,000 in county funds on expenses – nearly as much as the county’s other four supervisors combined” the Bee reported.

“Dickinson, now a state assemblyman, went on 16 taxpayer-funded trips, bought almost $4,000 worth of furniture and paid about $30,000 to a consultant for work on a youth violence committee, records show.”

I knew what he was. I complained loudly about his behavior when I  wrote a weekly column for the Sacramento Union. My stories focused on what he had been doing as county supervisor.

Sports Arena Part l

“Mr. Dickinson most recently made a name for himself with his flaccid handling of the proposed Sacramento Sports Arena” I wrote in September 2007. Despite Sacramento Voters soundly defeating initiatives Measures Q and R which would have raised taxes and spent the money on a sports arena, Dickinson continued to push like crazy to build an arena.

The back room deal was put together by Dickinson, and Senator Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento. They hurried Measures Q and R onto the ballot, leaving voters only a few days to vote on the measures which were missing crucial information. Dickinson continued withholding the information until two courts overruled him. But the measures failed anyway.

Steinberg and Dickinson also tried to get the measures passed by 50 percent simple majority vote instead of the two-thirds vote required for tax measures. Already strapped by county taxes, taxpayers smelled a rat and told arena supporters to pay for their own sports complex.

The Sacramento Grand Jury slammed City and County Sacramento officials in a scathing report about public officials’ attempts in Sacramento to build a sports facility with public money, and asked “Have the City and County deceived their citizens regarding their dealings with the Kings?”  They wrote, “Sacramento County breached the good faith of honest and open communications by placing Measures Q and R on the ballot asserting a deal which did not exist.”

Library Board

Dickinson was Chairman of the Sacramento Library Board of Directors when $800,000 was stolen by three employees in an over-billing and kickback scheme. In 2008, the Sacramento Grand Jury investigated and found gross mismanagement and financial conflicts of interest within the Sacramento Public Library Authority. The Grand Jury skewered the library’s board, of which Dickinson was chairman, for not overseeing the management, as well as the library’s finances.

But the real eye-opener was that despite the Grand Jury findings of gross mismanagement, even after the library director and two library officials were charged with felonies in the billing scandal, Dickinson stubbornly stood by the library director, Anne Marie Gold, after the Grand Jury recommended that she step down. After the scandal, Gold opened up her own library consulting firm and was hired by County Supervisors as a consultant to a county-led joint powers agency.

Grand Jury Get-Even

In what many have said is a vindictive move, Dickinson  proposed and passed  a bill last year that will neuter the very effective California’s Grand Jury system, which expose and prosecute government corruption, and root out waste and abuses of power by elected officials, boards and commissions. It is highly questionable how government officials can alter the Grand Jury process, when they are often the subjects of the investigations.

“Underhanded, sneaky behavior should not be rewarded with higher office,” I wrote in 2007. And I received a great deal of feedback from angry Sacramento residents about Dickinson’s arrogant behavior. Had they only know the extent of it, we might not be calling him “Assemblyman.”

FEB. 13, 2012

No comments

Write a comment
  1. Beelzebub
    Beelzebub 13 February, 2012, 10:13

    Write your congressman and complain. File a complaint with the FPPC. Better yet, contact your local Tea Party leader in Sactown and demand action. See what results that gets you. 😀

    The fix is in. Why do you think the Sac Bee waited until now to do the story? Oversight? 😀 Let me guess. Is Dickinson termed out?

    Dickinson doesn’t care what you write about him now. In fact, I bet he’s laughing his butt off at the stories. He’s probably looking forward to a nice appointment to a SacTown commission once he leaves office.

    The dirty pols are always one step ahead of the media. That’s the way the system is designed.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex The Wonder Dog!
    Rex The Wonder Dog! 13 February, 2012, 20:08

    Write your congressman and complain. File a complaint with the FPPC. Better yet, contact your local Tea Party leader in Sactown and demand action. See what results that gets you

    I have told this story numerous times, but will tell it again. I sued a local police department about 10 years ago, and during the discovery phase I asked if they had ever upheld a citizens complaint, going back 7 years. Guess what-not a SINGLE citizens complaint had been upheld in the previous 7 years-out of thousands. I should have asked them to go back 10 or 15 years, I am sure it would have produced the same result.

    Then there are complaints against judges, which produce even worse results. There has not been a single complaint upheld against a SINGLE federal judge-no matter what the complaint alleges-going back more than 30 years. With ONE exception. A local federal judge in LA was about to be impeached by the Congress over a legit complaint that was given the same reply as all the others were given, and the Congress had had enough of this judge and TOLD the Chief Justice of the 9th Circuit which overseas the federal judges in this are that unless this judge was looked into seriously they were going to remove him form the bench. ONLY then did the 9th take action, and the only action was some little public reprimand. Complaining about public/gov employees and officials is useless. Google judge Manual Real and impeachment- and read up on how the gov is fixed.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

CA response to Boston terror attack mostly measured, muted

April 17, 2013 By Chris Reed Unlike officials in New York, Washington and some other cities in the Northeast, elected

The People's Governor?

Steven Greenhut: The Sacramento Bee reported today that the Orange County Employees Association, the union representing OC’s miscellaneous county workers,

White House, wine country Democrats spar over disaster relief

President Donald Trump is under fire in Northern California not for the usual reasons – that Trump loathing is so intense