The ‘nut graph’ you’ll never see in a state government story

Oct. 1, 2012

By Chris Reed

On Sunday, as I read iconoclastic pollster Pat Caddell‘s sharp, persuasive tirade documenting the many issues where the national media have spared the public from the details of the Obama administration’s venality and incompetence, I got to thinking about the parallels with the Sacramento media’s coverage of the state government.

What was the single fact that most explains how California works, but which has never appeared in a succinct version in a regular newspaer story or “analysis” of Sacramento? It was obvious. Here’s a one-paragraph version that should be the basis of what journos call the “nut graph” of most stories about state spending and state priorities:

“The members of the most powerful political force in state politics, the California Teachers Association and the California Federation of Teachers, get far more money from taxpayers than any other single group. The teacher unions’ power derives from the automatic dues deducted from teachers’ paychecks, meaning taxpayers directly fund the lobbying and political operations of Sacramento’s most influential entity.”

I have lived in California since 1990, and I have seen many stories that point out that the biggest chunk of the state budget — per Proposition 98 — is public education, with a minimum of roughly 40 percent. In that time, I occasionally have seen stories that focus on the fact that compensation for all school employees is by far the biggest chunk of school district budgets.

But I seriously don’t remember a mainstream newspaper story that makes the collective points in the nut graph above. Nor do I remember a story that goes into the details of the nut graph: that teacher compensation has long been at least two-thirds of total state education spending and that it now is more like 80 percent.

Nor have I seen a story that frames the battle over school spending as being almost entirely about teacher pay, or that specifically says teacher pay is the single biggest element of the state budget.

Before now, have you ever read this anywhere? I doubt it.

This tracks with the points made by Caddell about the selective obliviousness of the media. Just as with the national media’s disinterest in noting that the White House lied about a terrorist attack on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, we’re seeing the California media look at Propositions 30, 32 and 38 and not note the centrality of the teacher compensation issue.

If they did, it would be obvious that the dominant issue in state politics is teacher jobs and teacher pay.

Now here is where it gets really pathetic.

Prop. 38

Proposition 38, introduced by liberal civil rights lawyer Molly Munger, has as a central tenet that the money it raises (allegedly) couldn’t go to teacher raises. It’s one of Munger’s talking points. So a KEY PREMISE of 38 is that it will avoid teacher union avarice.

And yet this is never pointed out by the regular media in anything approaching the stark terms laid out in my nut graph above, or the more indirect ways used by Munger.

This is incredible, this avoidance. It’s not just libertarian-lite whiners like me. It’s not just small-government/good-government advocates like It’s not just the California Republican Party. Anyone who has a functioning brain has to realize what’s going on here.

But not the Sacramento media. Instead, here’s an example of the crap/pap we see. This is a short Associated Press update of a 2005 budget fight that makes my point:

August 9, 2005

Teachers, schools superintendent sue governor over school funding

By JENNIFER COLEMAN, Associated Press Writer

SACRAMENTO — California’s top school official and the state’s largest teachers union sued Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday to restore $3.1 billion they claim is owed to public schools.

At issue is a deal school officials say was struck during a meeting with the governor in December 2003, a month after he was sworn into office.

Educators said they agreed to accept $2 billion in cuts to help the newly elected governor balance the 2004-05 state budget. To do that, lawmakers had to suspend Proposition 98, the voter-approved funding guarantee for schools.

In return, the governor promised schools would get more money if state revenues increased more than expected, said Jack O’Connell, superintendent of public instruction.

“Revenues did go up, and according to our agreement with the governor public education should have been one of the beneficiaries,” O’Connell said.

Instead, O’Connell said, schools were shorted an additional $3.1 billion over two years.

Schwarzenegger has denied there was a promise to share the excess revenue with schools. Because the funding guarantee was suspended, the schools were not entitled to a share of the billions of unanticipated income tax revenue California took in, his administration said.

In the budget approved earlier this summer, the governor used about $4 billion in unanticipated revenue to pay down some of the state’s debt, fund road improvements and reimburse cities and counties for money they lost when he repealed an increase in the vehicle license fee.

In the lawsuit, O’Connell, the California Teachers Association and some parents ask the court to find the state out of compliance with the law and state constitution.

The 2005-06 spending plan, signed by Schwarzenegger in July, invests nearly $60 billion in schools – more than half the $117.3 billion state budget.

Teacher pay

If you read that, would you have the slightest idea that this fight was almost 100 percent over teacher pay? Would you have the slightest sense of the Sacramento political dynamics it reflected? Would you have any sense of whose ox would get gored if Arnold got his way? Would you have any grasp of the real story of what this said about how Sacramento works?

No, of course you wouldn’t.

I know several reporters who cover Sacramento, and I have OK-to-good relationships with a few. But it is simply beyond my comprehension that so many of them think that it would be bad journalism to explicitly point out that teachers get more money from taxpayers than anyone else. And that these teachers’ unions use automatic paycheck deductions to massively multiply their clout.

These are objective facts, and they make the case for Proposition 32. But the next time that Associated Press or the reporters of the Sacramento Bee or the Los Angeles Times reports them, it will be the first.


Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 1 October, 2012, 08:43

    Teachers cleaning you out..payback for sending them your social headaches instead of for knowledge, culture and decorum!

    Reply this comment
  2. Hondo
    Hondo 1 October, 2012, 15:40

    Are you talking about your kids?

    Reply this comment
  3. The Africanized Swarm of Ted Steele System
    The Africanized Swarm of Ted Steele System 1 October, 2012, 15:44

    U Haul— I am laughing so hard I have to catch my breath—– the teachers are all billionaires! Buy GOLD !!! Move to Trona and get off the grid while there’s time!!

    Reply this comment
  4. Douglas
    Douglas 1 October, 2012, 15:54

    “taxpayers directly fund the lobbying and political operations of Sacramento’s most influential entity.”

    Sorry, but once the money is paid to the teacher, it is no longer “taxpayer money”

    Whether he pays union dues or buys a new car, is nobody’s business.

    Reply this comment
  5. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 1 October, 2012, 17:35

    Hondo aren’t you a Colorado carpetbagger working road crew near Montrose preaching to us happy well adjusted Californians who are beating back cave dwellers from out your way currently swarming the Donner Pass?

    Reply this comment
  6. Bob Smith
    Bob Smith 1 October, 2012, 20:59

    Prop 38’s claim is a lie. Money is fungible. Therefore, any new money can be used to increase teacher compensation.

    Reply this comment
  7. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 1 October, 2012, 23:24

    Teachers are the 5%ers, GED cops and firewhiners 1% ers…….

    Reply this comment
  8. Douglas
    Douglas 2 October, 2012, 07:54

    God forbid a teacher, cop, or firefighter should make as much as a plumber, electrician, or used car salesman.

    Reply this comment
  9. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 2 October, 2012, 08:49

    LOL….good one douglas, teacher, cop,and r firewhiner make 10-20 times what a plumber and electrician make and 50 times what a used car salesman makes.

    Average CA teacher comp= $108K for 37 week work year, and 36 hour contracted work week, or $80/hour.

    Average Firewhiner comp with OT= $200K, base with fringes anbd $40K OT, $240K

    Average cop comp= $75K-$125K base, plus $100K infringes and $20K in OT- $245K

    Go home lil dougie, you can’t pass off those SEIU whoppers here lil one!

    Reply this comment
  10. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 2 October, 2012, 09:24

    Poodle you couldn’t qualify for more than a cubicle job piking reverse mortgages or buggy whips.

    Cut the envy…you sound really silly and juvie!

    Reply this comment
  11. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 2 October, 2012, 09:27

    And we are concerned about. your general mental state….coveting lowers I.Q. and creats undue levels of uncontrollable frustration!

    Reply this comment
  12. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 2 October, 2012, 14:53

    Teddy, you’re so funny when you post under Uhaul~

    Reply this comment
  13. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 2 October, 2012, 15:32

    Poodle it is truck stop happy hour….cheese whiz chile relanos and a mug of ice cold Blatz beer $1.50 until mother-in-law night line dancing commences.

    Reply this comment
  14. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 2 October, 2012, 15:47

    Hi Teddy!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Does John Chiang have a Boss?

JULY 12, 2010 By KATY GRIMES Who is California state Controller John Chiang’s boss? The answer is surprisingly elusive. Right

Brutal Tax Assault on Internet Sales

APRIL 28, 2011 By JOHN SEILER California’s tax-increase cult is lobbying to grab every last dollar it can tax —

CA ‘Wall of Debt’ hits $1,126,200,000,000.00

May 8, 2013 By Ed Ring A new study by the California Public Policy Center, “Calculating California’s Total State and Local Government