Does supermajority portend Maldonado-style gamesmanship?

Nov. 9, 2012

By Chris Reed

In 2009, state Sen. Abel Maldonado made Democrats in the Legislature jump through an awful lot of hoops before the Santa Maria Republican would be the final vote needed for temporary tax hikes.

The new Democratic supermajority era in Sacramento portends a future in which on key bills, individual lawmakers who feel strongly could hold out for concessions either on the measure or on one of their pet causes.

That could be a constructive thing, if occasional contrarians like Sen. Lou Correa, D-Santa Ana, pushed for more business-friendliness from his fellow Democrats.

On the other hand, the supermajority era also could see legislative leaders shove through a wide range of bills over Jerry Brown’s vetoes, enforced with threats of banishment to tiny offices. I wrote about the wacky measures the governor has vetoed for the U-T San Diego’s editorial page:

“Here’s a short list of bills that would have become law the past two years without the governor’s veto: three measures that would have undercut his pension reform push; measures that would have microregulated domestic workers and led to the unionization of baby sitters and graduate students who assist professors; a measure that would have banned state law enforcement officials from turning over child abusers and other criminals wanted by the federal government if they were illegal immigrants; and a measure that would have given teachers unions more direct influence over the California State Teachers’ Retirement System. The governor also vetoed dozens of bills adding onerous new requirements on business.”

The new dynamics in Sacramento are going to be strange and unpredictable. They are likely to enhance Brown’s image as the sanest man in town.



Write a comment
  1. Bob
    Bob 9 November, 2012, 09:24

    With a two-thirds majority these Democrats will be like kids in a candy store.

    Remember that when Ahnode got through his tax hikes the Dems were demanding much higher taxes than what Ahnode wanted.

    And remember that most Dems in the legislature think Brown’s tax increases are not nearly enough.

    Anyone who believes Perez when he says that there are no plans for more tax increases is completely delusional.

    Reply this comment
  2. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 9 November, 2012, 11:43

    Well, don’t believe it then. Your choice. If you believed it, you would have to stop whining, and you wouldn’t want to do that, would you.

    Reply this comment
  3. Bob
    Bob 9 November, 2012, 14:44

    Well, don’t believe it then. Your choice. If you believed it, you would have to stop whining, and you wouldn’t want to do that, would you.

    Yeah, sure. Read Perez’s belly, “No new taxes!”

    Reply this comment
  4. Bob
    Bob 9 November, 2012, 17:19

    And with DemoNcrats going to conduct an orgy of tax increases next year this situation will become even worse:

    Reply this comment
  5. Hondo
    Hondo 10 November, 2012, 14:35

    Perez may not tax more BUT HE SURE IS GONNA SPEND MORE. Money he does not have.

    Reply this comment
  6. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 11 November, 2012, 05:52

    Backdoor Johnnie is going to be partying in sac town.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Is state Legislature hampering CalPERS, CalSTRS?

The California Public Employees Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System recently announced that they had exceeded their

6 measures qualify for ballot

Because it plays by its own rules, the California Legislature still can add initiatives to the November ballot. But with

O.C. Congresswoman’s top aide resigns following eight-count indictment

The chief of staff to Rep. Mimi Walters resigned on Wednesday following an eight-count indictment related to his time in another member’s office,