Senate committee advances bills on rape, sentencing

Lady Justice - ThemisMarch 7, 2013

By Dave Roberts

California state laws from the past occasionally crop up and need to be amended. That happened last week when the Senate Public Safety Committee unanimously approved SB 59, which is designed to close a loophole that allows a man to get away with rape by impersonating a woman’s boyfriend. Current law states that a rape occurs if a woman is married and the rapist impersonates her husband. But there is no rape if she’s not married and the rapist impersonates her boyfriend.

In January, the Second District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles overturned the rape conviction of Julio Morales, who admitted to police that he had sex with a sleeping woman who probably thought he was her boyfriend. The incident occurred at a party in Cerritos in 2009 after the woman, who had had three to five beers, went to bed and her boyfriend left the party. She awoke in the middle of the rape, screamed and pushed Morales away. He was convicted and served a three-year sentence. He will face a retrial, although he probably would not do any more time if convicted.

“Justice should not be conditioned on a victim’s marital status or sexual orientation,” the bill’s author, Sen. Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, told the committee. “This bill substitutes and defines the new term ‘sexual partner’ in place of the outdated word ‘spouse’ in the rape statue.”

She was supported by Katie Donahue, with the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault, which represents 84 rape crisis programs in the state.

“Women are currently vulnerable to this loophole in the law,” she said. “The criminal justice process can be a difficult, emotionally fraught experience for survivors. For any woman to have her rapist’s conviction overturned, despite the evidence against him, is revictimization. In this modern age, justice should not be tied to the marital status of the survivor.”

SB 59 is similar to AB 56. The main difference is that SB 59 changes the definition of rape from impersonating a “spouse” to impersonating a “sexual partner.” While AB 56 changes impersonating a “spouse” to impersonating “someone other than the accused.” Evans argued that AB 56 is overly broad.

“It basically becomes rape by misrepresentation,” she said. “The example might be somebody who is picking up a date in a bar, misrepresents who he or she is, misrepresents things about themselves that then induces the victim to have sexual relations with the perpetrator. I don’t think that’s where we want to go. The intent of the language in my bill is to address that issue where there already is an existing relationship and that is being used to perpetrate a rape.”

Keeping a lid on sentencing

The meeting began with Committee Chairwoman Loni Hancock, D-Oakland announcing that the committee’s six-year policy of “holding in committee bills that would increase felonies and the sentences connected with them” would continue in order to meet the court order to reduce state prison overcrowding.

“We recognize as legislators and as public advocacy groups, we care about the safety of our population,” she said. “And often times when a problem arises, all we can think of is an increased sentence or an additional felony. But there are other ways to think about solving these problems. States as diverse as Texas and Washington have made a decision that they cannot afford more prisons. They have adopted smart-on-crime policies, and we can do it here.”

Responded Sen. Joel Anderson, R-San Diego, “On behalf of Republicans on the committee we are committed to working for public safety. Public safety is paramount to California. If you can’t walk our streets and feel safe, then you’re not living in a free society. I would ask that the committee be very thoughtful in its approach and not allow this to become a partisan policy where Republicans always [have their bills held in committee] and Democrat bills don’t.”

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. Donkey
    Donkey 7 March, 2013, 08:04

    “Public safety,” this is not about public safety, it is about power. The power of the toltalitarian state to impose the weight of government on any and all accused.

    Keeping the wheels of the Prison Industrial Complex(PIC) well oiled is the reason for the useless law making drills. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  2. Hondo
    Hondo 7 March, 2013, 10:29

    Now if that woman had peed on her attacker, she might have not been raped.
    This over turning of that rape conviction is due to laziness of the legislature. Both parties. Someone should go through the criminal code every year to weed out 19th century laws that have no business being in the code. That law should have been found and dumped 50 years ago.
    Hondo….

    Reply this comment
  3. double l
    double l 7 March, 2013, 12:11

    I’ve heard people suggest that for every new law proposed, the proposer shall take three laws off of the books. There are so many current laws on the books that I can’t help but feel that all of us are guilty of breaking one or more laws. How many new laws were passed in the last two years, 2,000 or so?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Will appeals court notice AG’s flip-flop on bullet train?

It took the California Supreme Court five days to unanimously reject Gov. Jerry Brown’s request that justices immediately consider a

Equal employment for criminals

April 30, 2012 By Katy Grimes A recent decision by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is about to undo many

Bring Ol’ Sparky back to CA?

California hasn’t executed anyone in more than 8 years. And just 14 since it was allowed again in 1978. Problems