In his own words: Gov. Brown on fracking

May 19, 2013

By Chris Reed

Jerry Brown -2As I’ve written about repeatedly, the California media simply refuse to break away from the green narrative that fracking is new, dangerous and potentially catastrophic. All three assertions are belied by 60-plus years of fracking. Greens only started griping about fracking when information technology made it so much more efficient over the past decade that it made alternative energy seem like a far dumber alternative.

For this reason, I thought I would print in its entirety what Jerry Brown said about fracking in California at his Tuesday press conference outlining his revised 2013-14 state budget. Raise your hand if this is the impression you got from California’s mainstream media coverage of fracking. OK, none of you raised your hand. Back to the transcript:

“Reporter: …There’s a fairly healthy debate about hydraulic fracturing, fracking of oil. Some people say it could be a big boon to the economy, could be a boon to tax dollars in the state. There’s an intense debate about. Where do you stand on the issues?

“EGB: … I stand on intelligent analysis of the issues. We have a very good division of Oil and Gas, they are reviewing it, the Legislature has several bills. This is not about just saying, ideologically, yea or nay. It’s about looking at what could be a fabulous opportunity. But we want to make sure about the aquifers, some people are talking about earthquakes, a lot of different things, what are the chemicals, what do we know. And in addition, climate change is real. Now, the reason why I have some sympathy for oil drilling in California is because 98 percent of the people are using oil that is imported. And until we get them in electric cars or walking or riding on bikes, we need oil. But, we’ve got to get off it. Climate change is very real, it has passed 400 parts per million maybe, is serious stuff. So, I have to balance my strong commitment to deal with climate change and renewable energy with what could be a fabulous economic opportunity.

“And if you remember about oil drilling, oil drilling in Long Beach, which was really pioneered I think when my father was Governor, poured I don’t know how many billions, into higher education. So this could be good, but there are issues, and I want to look at them. I don’t deal with this thinking ‘oh the sky is falling in’ or, ‘Utopia has arrived.’ We’ve got to look at it. These are hard questions and we are going to look at them with a thoughtful way.


“Reporter: Sounds like you disagree with the moratorium, then?

“EGB: Well, let’s see the evidence. First of all, I don’t think they are ready to go yet. There’s a lot of technical engineering issues. So I think we have time to do it right.

“Reporter: Governor, what about the possibility of an oil severance tax?  Particularly given the potential Monterey Shale.

“EGB: Look, we just got a nice tax. 55 percent of the people voted for it and I think we ought to take a deep breath and show how we are spending it in a wise way, before we start looking around at ways to fill up more money. By the way those people who talk about oil tax – good luck. The last time we had one the oil companies spent almost 50 million dollars fighting it. Ideas that in the abstract may seem appealing, when you put them on the ground, they don’t work quite as well.”

When will CA media catch up with reality?

Read between the lines, and it sounds like the governor sees fracking as a great opportunity and doesn’t take the doom-and-gloomers all too seriously.

Which biegs this question: When will California mainstream media coverage of fracking begin to catch up with, yunno, reality?


Write a comment
  1. Tax Target
    Tax Target 19 May, 2013, 09:00

    “As we know climate change is real”??? Is he now a climatologist? Climate change – yes that occurs… yesterday was warm. It might be warmer today. Cooler tomorrow.

    The dumbocrats use climate change ideologically to support their view of how energy resources should be managed instead of managing those resources for the good of the people. Its getting to the point that government is of the environment, by the environment and for the environment.

    Reply this comment
  2. Bubba
    Bubba 19 May, 2013, 16:09

    Perhaps Jerry should re ignite his relationship with Linda Ronstadt, and they can both skip off to La La land hand in hand to hug trees and kiss frogs.
    Get real; Gov. Moonbeam for anything that makes sense? He said right in the quote: We have get people out of cars (Gas Powered) and onto bicycles and electric vehicles. (Where does electricity come Jerry?) You morons in Sacramento kowtowed to the eco wacko’s and shut down the Nuke plant in San Diego, won’t let any conventional power plants be built in California, what all electric power to be green via solar and wind which currently produces only a fraction of our power.
    No wonder business are leaving!

    Reply this comment
  3. S Moderation Douglas
    S Moderation Douglas 19 May, 2013, 20:26

    Electric vehicles are much more energy efficient than internal combustion engines. Even after allowing for transmission loss in the power grid.

    Even if electricity is generated by coal or gas. Less total energy will be consumed and fewer emissions released

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Bill to increase CA minimum wage passes Senate

On Tuesday, a bill to increase the state’s minimum wage was approved by the state Senate. Senate Bill 3, jointly authored by

The Green Attorney General

Katy Grimes: As I stood in the cold yesterday watching Kamala Harris as she was sworn in as Attorney General,

Erasing “man” and “men,” one state at a time

July 8, 2013 By Katy Grimes The radical feminists are on a roll. They continue to make gains in their