Need to create middle-class CA jobs matters more than minimum wage

Need to create middle-class CA jobs matters more than minimum wage

Minimum-Wage_0Economic conservatives seem wary over the attempts by Democrats at just about every level of government to focus on the minimum wage. But should they be? It provides an easy way to broaden the debate from how the poor are faring to how those in the middle class are doing. In California, it provides a way to point out that the state status quo — dominated by hard-left lawmakers, swaggering unions, rapacious trial lawyers and Gaia-worshiping greens — is a failed one when it comes to job creation.

I wrote about this angle in the U-T San Diego today:

“University of California-Irvine economist David Neumark’s review of 100-plus major academic studies — which did not include studies from ideologically aligned think tanks — concluded that 85 percent of the analyses “find a negative employment effect on low-skilled workers.” Automation is likely to worsen this effect; Google “Europe” and “Corner Café” and you’ll see a Starbucks initiative that inevitably will be copied and yield mass displacement of U.S. fast-food workers.

“But even if minimum-wage hikes don’t kill jobs, the idea that this policy is a promising solution to income inequality makes little sense. In the big picture, what we need are many more people with in-demand job skills that lead to middle-income careers. And what we badly need from our elected leaders is an acknowledgment that California’s approach isn’t working in creating these job skills.

“Income inequality isn’t just growing in the U.S. It’s growing in all advanced nations as technological advances wipe out middle-class jobs by the millions. It’s growing everywhere as the job marketplace increasingly values — and strongly rewards — a narrower range of skills than it did previously.

“The best way to minimize the disruption this inexorable change creates is by maximizing the number of people with job skills not diminished by ‘creative destruction.’ For starters, we need a focus on computer science and technological expertise in middle school and high school — not curriculums based on the educational values of the 1950s. We also need to make it much easier for displaced workers of any age to go back to the classroom to get practical job training.

“Pursuing this ambitious agenda would be far more daunting than raising the minimum wage. But it has promise to significantly reduce income inequality — not nibble at the margins.”

Does left want to create middle-class jobs? Or play populist games?

1percentAs the success of the “war on women” rhetoric in getting young women to the polls in 2012 suggests, both parties are likely to be in permanent 24-7-365 campaign mode on a national level from here on out. That doesn’t bode well for substantive debate.

But at some point, it seems likely that the middle class — especially those with laid-off family memories or nervousness about their own prospects — will begin to tire of the Occupy rhetoric and the class-war cliches — the very efforts that laid the groundwork for the current relentless focus by Dems on the minimum wage. I wrote about the diminishing long-term returns of populist rhetoric in January:

“We could have marginal income tax rates of 90 percent, and it wouldn’t change the fact that for 40 years we have been moving inexorably toward an economy in which elite skill sets are highly rewarded while improving technology and automation steadily thin out jobs in which those with average job skills used to be able to make middle-class wages. Instead of the 1 percent vs. 99 percent divide, this is the divide that matters most. New York Times economics columnist Tyler Cowen pegs this gap as the 15 percent of working adults with elite job skills vs. the 85 percent without. …

“Thinking in fresh new ways about how we can become the society we need to become is not as tidy or viscerally satisfying as simply blaming the 1 percent. But it has far greater promise of actually yielding a more broadly prosperous society.”

In California, alas, thinking in fresh new ways is verboten in the state Capitol. Majority lawmakers are vastly more likely to use their clout to protect unions and public employees, to give trial lawyers new ways to squeeze money out of the legal system, and to pay tribute to the green religion then to actually take steps to create middle-class jobs.

Will most Californians notice this? Maybe not. I increasingly buy the theory that values drive voting more than pocketbook issues, a big change from a generation ago. And so in California, as long as non-white voters believe right-wingers are uncomfortable with them, right-wingers are doomed in statewide elections. As long as independent, secular Californians believe right-wingers are judgmental social conservatives, they’re doomed in statewide elections.

But if California libertarians and fiscal conservatives ever managed to advance a candidate who kept the focus on jobs and the economy and avoided the right’s baggage, it wouldn’t take a miracle for a GOPer to get elected to statewide office — just a 5-to-1, UCLA-in-this-year’s-March-Madness kind of long shot.

13 comments

Write a comment
  1. S Moderation Douglas
    S Moderation Douglas 26 March, 2014, 06:26

    “dominated by hard-left lawmakers, swaggering unions, rapacious trial lawyers and Gaia-worshping greens”

    Now THAT’S journalism.

    Reply this comment
    • S Moderation Douglas
      S Moderation Douglas 26 March, 2014, 06:27

      the least you could do is use a spell checker

      Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 26 March, 2014, 06:40

      Why so upset SMD? Do you find it uneasy that people are asking questions about the RAGWUS cabal? Which feeding cabal do you emanate from, police, fire, or teacher?

      Chris is correct, He has clearly pointed out the main reasons, and they all have to do with the lefty flower children of the 1960’s and early 70’s. 🙂

      Reply this comment
  2. Donkey
    Donkey 26 March, 2014, 06:29

    The jobs are gone in California and good paying ones in the private sector are not coming back, at least not until the RAGWUS is terminated and pensions, pay, and benefits are brought under control by the taxpayers. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 26 March, 2014, 08:58

    Once the globalists figured out the ravaged little people are desperate for any work…..game on……slave wages abound.

    Look around you…..you see decaying neighborhoods, poor people in rags, junky old cars, 77 cents stores…..

    Stop tipping….buy American union made goods and services….demand politicians encourage manufacturing business development every minute of the day…..

    Tax globalists, big box stores, lousy chain food restaurants, penny loafer wearing MBA’s for their labor exploitation and unjust accumulation of investment capital.

    Reply this comment
  4. S Moderation Douglas
    S Moderation Douglas 26 March, 2014, 09:14

    “Thinking in fresh new ways about how we can become the society we need to become”

    Did you even read what YOU wrote?

    ” improving technology and automation steadily thin out jobs”

    200 years ago, 90% of Americans worked in agriculture. Now, fewer than 2% can produce more than enough food. As you wrote, technology and automation are now making fewer workers NECESSARY, not just in manufacturing, but in information, service, and entertainment.

    If we can produce all we need (more than we need, actually) with fewer people working, WHY do we need “more jobs”?

    Should we create ” make work” jobs and get people out WASTING RESOURCES just so they will feel “useful” ? When the railroads did that, they called it featherbedding, and that was not a complement. (Don’t bother, we all know it was the “swaggering unions” to blame)

    “Old” thinking:

    ” The most obvious way is by sharply increasing the number of those with 21st-century job skills. ”

    ” Wealth would be more evenly distributed if computer science courses were required in middle school; if colleges offered beginning and advanced college-level computer science and engineering courses for free; if science and tech training were free for those looking to change careers.”

    That’s not ” Thinking in fresh new ways ” that’s old Reagan reactionary ways.

    Train all the people you want in computer sciences, but we won’t NEED that many computer techs. You’re back to square one.

    I’ll make you’re day. Here is REAL thinking in fresh new ways:

    “The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite! We need more welfare and fewer jobs. Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production. We ought to recognize it and create an income-maintenance system so every single American has the dignity and the wherewithal for shelter, basic food, and medical care.”

    Of course you know that’s Jerry Brown, but it’s not really new. He was ahead of his time twenty years ago.

    Reply this comment
  5. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 26 March, 2014, 09:19

    We need to STOP sending our manufacturing jobs overseas, those jobs are the backbone of the middle class and Amerika.

    Reply this comment
  6. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 26 March, 2014, 09:21

    I’ll make you’re day. Here is REAL thinking in fresh new ways: “The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite!

    We need more welfare and fewer jobs. Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production. We ought to recognize it and create an income-maintenance system so every single American has the dignity and the wherewithal for shelter, basic food, and medical care.”

    You are dumber than a bag of rocks

    Reply this comment
  7. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 26 March, 2014, 10:16

    A large portion of the “middle class” jobs in California have always been directly linked to construction – residential construction in particular. Much of that was historically driven by the large inflows of federal funds for defense manufacturing in and around LA, OC, San Diego, and the SF Bay area.

    It’s hard to see how those jobs can be replaced, here or anywhere else.

    Reply this comment
  8. S Moderation Douglas
    S Moderation Douglas 26 March, 2014, 12:48

    “Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production.”

    THAT’S thinking in fresh new ways.

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 26 March, 2014, 13:43

      The most ignorant statement in CWD history, along with the rest of the quote!

      That stale thinking at best. 🙂

      Reply this comment
  9. Queeg
    Queeg 27 March, 2014, 07:56

    Would you stop insulting legitimate thoughtful posters…pathetic.

    Reply this comment
  10. chakras-energie.com
    chakras-energie.com 17 February, 2015, 23:31

    The second possibility, to fetch the Parent reference when Chakra wants it, sounds easy
    at first.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

No New Taxes!

John Seiler: Californians need to be firm: No new taxes! Because the tax wasters are cooking up tax increases right

Middle class is Shocked! Shocked! at tax increase

Jan. 13, 2013 By John Seiler Wait! Weren’t the tax increase supposed to hit only the rich? President Obama, Gov.

Hollingsworth's sensible pension reform

Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, R-Murrieta, is introducing tomorrow important pension reform legislation, SB919. I’ve given it a quick perusal and this