Unlike Brown, Hawaii gov took on teachers — and paid

Unlike Brown, Hawaii gov took on teachers — and paid

orwell.quoteAs someone who went to college in Hawaii and spent eight years there as a journalist, I know the state’s politics pretty well. It is so solidly Democrat that it only has one Republican in its state senate. This monolithic hold on state government in turn empowers the party’s base of public employee unions, which expect deference.

Some expect it even more than others. Which brings us to the media’s conventional theories as to why Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie was defeated in the Democratic primary on Saturday in a landslide by state Sen. David Ige. Yes, Abercrombie angered many Democrats when he refused the request of dying, beloved Sen. Daniel Inouye to appoint Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa as his successor. Yes, Abercrombie wasn’t particularly skilled in selling a positive image.

But if he hadn’t taken on the powerful Hawaii State Teachers Association (HSTA) in 2011 and forced teachers to take a 5 percent pay cut to make the state budget balance, he probably wouldn’t have faced Ige or a serious challenger in the primary. A Honolulu Star-Advertiser analysis from July 31, 2011, notes that Abercrombie only wanted teachers to share the same pain as other public employees:

Abercrombie imposed a “last, best and final offer” that roughly matches the pay cuts taken by the state’s largest public employee union, the Hawaii Government Employees Association.

This led the HSTA to seek out Ige to run for governor. In February, the union formalized its support, giving a huge boost to the obscure lawmaker.

And now Abercrombie is only the second Hawaii governor to ever lose a re-election bid.

CA teachers spared the pension pain facing other public employees

The contrast with Jerry Brown could not be more instructive.

In 2011, the California governor unveiled a pension reform proposal that was unusually ambitious. In an approach similar to Abercrombie’s on the 2011 Hawaii state budget, Brown’s plan held that there should be shared pain to address  a fiscal problem — in this case, the long-term underfunding of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and some local government pension funds. That translated into legislation under which affected employees eventually will have to roughly split the total cost of their pensions with taxpayers.

But this year’s law to shore up the California State Teachers’ Retirement System ignores that framework. Instead, taxpayers will foot 90 percent of the cost of new CalSTRS funding and teachers only 10 percent.

More $ meant for struggling students heads to CA teachers

In California, some public employees are more equal than others. Jerry Brown figured that out long ago.

In Hawaii, the governor only figured that out Saturday.

Meanwhile, there’s more evidence that the Local Control Funding Formula education reform approved last year was a ruse cooked up by Brown, the CTA and CFT to free up more funds for teacher compensation — not primarily a way to help target funds for struggling students. This is from the Sac Bee:

Sacramento-area school districts have begun giving teachers pay raises and bonuses, often retroactively, as they receive more funding from the state.

Twin Rivers Unified, Elk Grove Unified and El Dorado Union High are among the many local school districts that have negotiated raises with their unions that reach back to last year or beyond. The pay hikes are on top of the “step-and-column” increases traditionally given to educators annually based on their years of service and level of education.

The raises come after a 2012 voter-approve tax hike and a multiyear state plan to increase school funding through a new formula intended to direct money to low-income students and English-language learners.

As Cal Watchdog noted last week, this same scenario is unfolding in Los Angeles Unified.

It is not what voters were promised when they backed tax hikes in 2012. It is not what the media were told would happen when the Local Control Funding Formula was enacted in 2013.

But it’s par for the course. In California, as in Hawaii, unions dominate government — especially teacher unions. Mess with their compensation, and you’ll pay a price. And if that means other unions play the role of second-class citizens in Democratic Party politics, so be it.





Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 11 August, 2014, 10:28

    Teachers there get paid below 50k where housing and food is higher than Kali.

    The student population is loaded with multi generations of welfare spawn who show up for baby sitting, beer bottle cap popping instruction and NFL farm team training..

    Education in elite private schools is mandatory for developing the small amount of talent needed to manage the service economy.

    Work ethic of locals is …..well……not.

    Reply this comment
  2. Donkey
    Donkey 11 August, 2014, 11:31

    Over paid and underworked at every RAGWUS level!! 🙂

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 11 August, 2014, 15:58

    They are called Ragwahnini, as I recall, wearing grass skirts and Henry Hudson- style beads moonlighting on weekends singing to relaxing globalists in fancy hotels!

    Reply this comment
  4. bob
    bob 11 August, 2014, 20:17

    Brownie knows who butters his bread.

    Now get back to work tax serfs the bread buttering can be paid for!

    Reply this comment
  5. S Moderation Douglas
    S Moderation Douglas 11 August, 2014, 21:19

    According to CALSTRS 2012 actuarial valuation, the normal cost rate is 18.299% of wages.

    Contributions for teachers who were hired before Jan. 1, 2013, will increase from 8% to 10.25% over three years, which puts them well over the 50% of normal cost.

    ” this year’s law to shore up the California State Teachers’ Retirement System ……………….DOES NOT……………ignore that framework.”

    ” 90 percent of the cost of new CalSTRS funding” refers to catch up on the unfunded liability….entirely unrelated to the normal cost.

    AB340 very clearly ” Requires new employees to contribute at least half of normal costs, and sets a similar target for current employees, subject to bargaining. ”

    “Normal costs”, Mr. Reed. It is not semantics.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Arnold's budget: More cuts needed

I’m working on a longer piece on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 2010-11 budget proposal [pdf]. My preliminary thoughts: It’s a start

Sacto can recover from bad arena deal

April 24, 2012 By Katy Grimes Just last week, the news that the arena deal in Sacramento was dead was

Gun control quickly rears its head in Calif.

Dec. 15, 2012 By John Seiler In the wake of the Connecticut school shooting, it didn’t take long for gun-control