CA bans wildlife hunting contests

CA bans wildlife hunting contests

Wile E CoyoteWile E. Coyote is smirking.

Despite a robust and thriving population, coyotes have just received an unprecedented degree of legal protection from the Golden State. Bringing a longstanding rural tradition to an end, the California Fish and Game Commission cracked down on competitive hunting events, including those used to cull the animals.

Perhaps ironically, coyotes — and other “nongame species and fur-bearing animals” like bobcats and and beavers covered by the prize hunting ban — had a single, lone wolf to thank.

Animal conservation activists became aware that a particular wolf, known by the designation OR7 and nicknamed “Journey,” could have placed itself on a migratory collision course with a so-called “Coyote Drive.” The event, stretching across three days in California’s remote northeast county of Modoc, had already attracted the attention of protestors, as the San Francisco Chronicle observed.

Last year’s seventh annual drive drew fire from a score of conservation groups. In the contest, pairs of hunters aimed to win by killing the most coyotes; ties went to whichever team bagged the most coyotes in the least time.

While event organizers presented the drive as a means of population control, Project Coyote and other organizations succeeded in pushing the federal Bureau of Land Management to prohibit the drive on terrain it controls.

That effective mobilizing effort prepared the way for a second round of activism targeting California law. Claiming the Coyote Drive was simply one aspect of a larger problem, Project Coyote once again teamed with environmentalists and wildlife activists, pressing state regulators to wipe out prize hunting at a single stroke.

Again, they succeeded. By a 4-1 vote, the state Fish and Game Commission outlawed hunting competitions of any kind. In a statement, commission head Michael Sutton proclaimed the hunts “an anachronism” with “no place in modern wildlife management.” (Conservationists had argued that the Coyote Drive actually increased the animals’ breeding, as a result of the effectively random way it reduced their numbers.)

Persistent incentives

Although cash prizes in the Coyote Drive ran as high as $500, ranchers and rural Californians said plenty of incentives remained for them to kill coyotes that threaten their livelihood. The Fish and Game Commission did not ban one-off killings, and big money of a different kind awaits those willing to train a gun on the often marauding animals.

As Fox News noted, the latest numbers from the U.S. Department of Agriculture revealed cattle ranchers in-state “lost more than $4 million in 2010 to predators, and coyotes accounted for the largest number of attacks.”

Buck Parks, president of a Modoc County fishing and hunting club, told Fox News ranchers would “encourage folks to get out and help manage these predators by hunting them,” even if no prize events could be held.


Until further notice, California will remain as tolerant toward informal coyote kills as other states, most of which have not imposed bag limits on individual hunters. Outlawing or reducing that activity would pose a much greater challenge to activists, for whom the case for a ban would hinge more on animal-rights claims than on conservation.

Nevertheless, the defeat of the Coyote Drive has shifted policy in California far away from what state regulations permit around the country. “Frenchville, Pennsylvania, saw 4,000 hunters sign up for its 22nd annual coyote hunt earlier this year,” reported National Public Radio’s Nathan Rott. “Florida has its Python Challenge, and Texas, its Big Nasty Hog Contest.”

But Camilla Fox, one of Project Coyote’s founders, told Rott she and her fellow activists saw California’s prize hunt ban as a model with nationwide applicability. Hinting at a broader approach to come, she conjectured that “just as we have, as a nation, banned cockfighting and dog fighting, I do think that we will see an end to wildlife-killing contests.”


Write a comment
  1. Ted
    Ted "Eddy Baby" Steele, Associate Prof. 11 December, 2014, 10:22

    As Americans shouldn’t we be able to kill any sentient beings we want because we got that freedom thing from the founders ™ ?

    Reply this comment
  2. Timberrrrrr......
    Timberrrrrr...... 11 December, 2014, 10:41

    Wouldn’t it be cool if Coyotes could cognitively evolve to such a point that they could band together develop a war plan against their killers just like we do against our fellow human beings? That way it would be a fair fight. And I love fair fights. I detest when a man’s hands are tied behind his back and then he’s thrown into a ring to defend his life. I feel the same way about hunting down defenseless animals with high powered rifles. Real brave, huh? I especially deplore these urbanites who build their housing projects into the woods (which has been the coyote’s habitat forever) and then complains when a coyote kills their pet dog and wants them all exterminated. We humans are generally the ones who cause all the problems. The animals just want to be left alone to do what they’ve done for thousands of years. We are the most arrogant creatures on planet earth.

    Reply this comment
  3. Timberrrrrr......
    Timberrrrrr...... 11 December, 2014, 12:18

    When I die I want God to send me where he sends all the dogs and coyotes. I love dogs and coyotes. For they do nothing for political reasons.

    Reply this comment
    • Ted
      Ted "Eddy Baby" Steele, Associate Prof. 11 December, 2014, 16:34

      Ironic OC Observer– since you do EVERYthing for pol reasons I suspect…….

      Reply this comment
      • Timberrrrrr......
        Timberrrrrr...... 11 December, 2014, 18:41

        I am a political athiest, Teddysmal. I support right over wrong, justice over injustice, moral over immoral and honor over dishonor. I will support a democrat over a republican any day of the week if he or she stands for freedom. I am not like you….a one note band. Shallow and rigid. 🙂

        Reply this comment
    NTHEOC 11 December, 2014, 12:46

    Animal sport hunting should be banned everywhere! The only time an animal should be hunted is if it’s going to be someone’s dinner.

    Reply this comment
    • Timberrrrrr......
      Timberrrrrr...... 11 December, 2014, 13:13

      If they really want to make it a ‘sport’ then let’s do this: Human hunters should be required to wear a pork chop necklace and enter a large cage that contains two hungry coyotes armed only with a hunting knife and a 6 inch blade. Let the fight begin. Now that’s true sport. Taking a high powered rifle into the coyote’s back yard and picking off coyotes at 75 yards is not a sport. It’s a massacre. And it’s cowardly. 🙁

      Reply this comment
  5. Ted
    Ted "Eddy Baby" Steele, Associate Prof. 11 December, 2014, 16:36

    If the GOV shuts down our right to kill animals– then what other “right” is it ok for them to shut down?

    Shouldn’t the Doommera ™ be consistent?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Brown’s State of the State address is both conciliatory and defiant

Jerry Brown teetered between conciliatory and defiant in his annual State of the State address on Tuesday.   The popular

Shutdown: Where CA Lawmakers Stand

For the first time in 17 years, the federal government has shut down. As has previously explained, this doesn’t

In reform showdown, who does Obama administration target? Disabled CA students

During the budget theater of recent months, the Obama administration’s ruthless determination to make cuts hurt the public was on