NFL schemes for L.A. nearing end zone

charamelody / flickr

charamelody / flickr

Although the race to land an NFL deal in Los Angeles have long been anyone’s game, some clarity on the potential outcome began to emerge this summer.

Dynamic duo

The competition originally pitted three teams against one another: the St. Louis Rams, the Oakland Raiders and the San Diego Chargers. With the Rams and Raiders both former L.A. teams, it seemed implausible that both might return, but league officials had signaled interest in at least two new arrivals. So when the Chargers and Raiders announced plans for a joint stadium development to rival Rams owner Stan Kroenke’s, all bets were suddenly off.

Now, however, a consensus has begun to emerge among insiders. “The likelihood of the NFL approving the Chargers and Raiders moving to Carson has increased,” the Orange County Register reported, “because of the rapidly dwindling chances of San Diego and Oakland to keep the teams, say league executives, sports consultants and the man whose job it is to sell the league on the relocation.”

At a key meeting next month, Raiders/Chargers pointman Carmen Policy — once an executive for the San Francisco 49ers and Cleveland Browns — will make the case to the league’s owners and executives. Policy told the Register “he sees a growing momentum within NFL ownership to give the Chargers and Raiders the green light to apply for relocation for the 2016 season as early as September or October. Policy said the league ‘without question’ will approve the moves to Carson, perhaps before the end of the 2015 regular season.”

San Diego showdown

The move represented a nightmare for the city of San Diego, which has put off Charger requests for a new stadium for roughly fifteen years. The Chargers did not pull the trigger on their plans for an L.A. stadium in the city of Carson until Kroekne announced his intention to build a stadium — presumably for the Rams — in Inglewood. Only at the last minute, “San Diego responded with a concept for a 65,000-seat facility that would be built next to the current Qualcomm Stadium,” as La Jolla Patch noted.

San Diego has scrambled to keep the Chargers — rushing along the would-be stadium’s environmental impact report, and mobilizing the support of Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego. “We want the Chargers to stay in San Diego if the right agreement can be reached,” she said, according to Patch. “As I have said before, if an agreement is reached, I am committed to making sure San Diego can benefit from state legislation that is consistent with what other cities have received for their sports facilities.”

Neither the Chargers nor the Raiders expect their respective cities to come through in the clutch with deals they’re willing and able to take; the Rams, meanwhile, have shown every indication of wanting to split St. Louis.

Calling audibles

As a result, the NFL itself has had to hustle. Whichever teams wind up in Los Angeles in 2016, they’ll all need to play somewhere. None of the current stadium plans would finish construction by then. In order to avoid being caught up short, the league has sought out “temporary venues for the 2016 season for one or two teams relocating to the Los Angeles area,” the Register reported. “USC officials have already said they want to host an NFL team at the Coliseum in 2016. The university’s lease, however, allows only one NFL team to play at the stadium.”

Even securing two temporary venues, however, would simply put off the real problem. “Three teams either want or need Los Angeles but there is only room for one stadium and two teams,” as the Los Angeles Daily News put it. Navigating the situation to a safe landing presents a unique challenge, as simple math suggests one team might be left out in the cold.”

Summing it all up, one league official told the Daily News the harsh truth: “It could get messy.”


Write a comment
  1. Dave Boz
    Dave Boz 3 August, 2015, 04:52

    The goal is not one or two new privately-funded stadiums in LA; the goal is three new taxpayer-funded stadiums in Oakland, San Diego and St Louis. At least two of those three will come to pass. Remember, the NFL’s business model is built on taxpayer subsidies, and the pols in at San Diego and St Louis are moving heaven and earth to screw the taxpayers in those cities. Oakland may have to wait a bit more for their pile of taxpayer dough, but I don’t think the league or the teams are going to completely upset a very successful business model.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 3 August, 2015, 22:09

    [email protected] “league approval” to MOVE!

    Al Davis SPANKED the NFL and Pete Rozelle so bad back in 1982 Pete’s fanny is still sore….ANY TEAM can MOVE to ANY city and they do not need the NFL or anyone else’s “approval”.

    Reply this comment
  3. Deserttrek
    Deserttrek 4 August, 2015, 11:39

    taxpayer money to line the pockets of an organization that made over $7 billion last year. the corrupt politicians want their free tickets and luxury box cocktails. the nfl is not needed by any city and they should be paying to play not the other way around

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
Los AngelesNFLRaidersstadiumRamsChargers

Related Articles

Obamacare takes turn for the worse in CA

As the Affordable Care Act and the Covered California health exchange enter their second year, Californians have begun to encounter

Betty Yee flips, now backs high-speed rail

Board of Equalization member Betty Yee has changed her mind about the state’s controversial high-speed rail plan. During the June

California Enviro Policy Goes Schizo

MAY 19, 2011 By DAVE ROBERTS California’s energy utilities have been ordered by state officials to provide one third of