Feds probe Nestle’s CA operations

nestlepurelife logo hrNestle, which has spent months weathering attacks on its water bottling practices in California, has been targeted by the federal government for investigation.

“Under pressure from environmental groups’ lawsuits, the U.S. Forest Service has begun a comprehensive environmental review of Switzerland-based bottled water giant Nestle’s Corp. continuing operations in a San Bernardino Mountain canyon,” the San Bernardino Sun reported. “Since its permit expired, in 1988, Nestle has been drawing what now amounts to millions of gallons of water from the rugged Strawberry Canyon in the San Bernardino Mountains, north of San Bernardino. Under Forest Service regulations, expired special use permits, like what Nestle has, remain in effect until they are either renewed or denied.”

According to the lawsuit filed against Nestle, that policy led to an explicit green light for its unique consumption arrangement. “The Forest Service has allowed pipeline operators to continue transporting water about four miles, from a series of bore holes and tunnels to a storage tank near California 18, without more stringent review required after the original permit was issued in 1976,” the Los Angeles Times observed at the time of the suit’s filing.

Sharp demands

That arrangement incurred the wrath of environmentalists. Even though Nestle’s renewal application is pending — meaning it’s legal for the company to continue its operations — its impact on the state’s ecology amid the current drought became the focus of a sweeping lawsuit, pressing the federal government to take action. “The Forest Service was sued in October by environmental and public interest groups who allege the Swiss-based company is operating its Strawberry Canyon pipeline on a permit that expired in 1988,” the Associated Press noted. “The groups, led by the Center for Biological Diversity, said the prolonged drought in California combined with the water operation is affecting wildlife.” According to the wire, the CBD and other groups “believe species, including Least Bell’s Vireo and California spotted owls, could see their numbers increased with improved water supply, the lawsuit said.”

The CBD counts The Story of Stuff Project and the Courage Campaign Institute among its fellow plaintiffs. Warning that Nestle has siphoned off “between 50m-150m gallons of water each year from a creek in the southern Californian forest to use in its Arrowhead bottled water brand,” the Guardian reported, those groups asked the Forest Service “to immediately turn off the water spigot and conduct a permit review, assessing the environmental impact of Nestlé’s operations.” Courage Campaign environmental director Eddie Kurtz called Nestle’s consumption of “public water” both illegal and immoral, according to the Guardian.

Managing protests

For its part, the Forest Service has sought to placate activist groups while initiating the review process. When pressed by CREDO, a self-styled progressive activist organization, the Forest Service responded that it had cautioned Nestle about the prospect of future restrictions on its water consumption. According to CREDO, the Forest Service indicated that, “should the drought continue, as we all expect it will, the state or local authorities may make further demands for conservation measures from all water users.”

Nestle had the local California media to blame for the initial scrutiny surrounding its arrangement with the Forest Service. “The legal action comes on the heels of an investigation this year by the Desert Sun,” as the Los Angeles Times noted. “Jody Noiron, supervisor for the San Bernardino National Forest, told the paper afterward that re-issuance of the permit would become a priority for the agency.”

After the Sun’s coverage, the story quickly gained steam across the state and the country. Protesters gathered to challenge Nestle face to face, while a nationwide movement to push bottling operations out of California succeeded in causing Starbucks to relocate its sourcing. “But others have continued to bottle water despite the drought. Wal-Mart, for example, still bottles water in California, as do companies at more than 100 other plants that are still licensed to bottle water in the state,” Business Insider noted at the time.


Write a comment
  1. Richard Rider
    Richard Rider 11 January, 2016, 07:54

    If water was not such a low cost item per unit, and if shipping this item didn’t cost so much per unit, I suspect that we wouldn’t have ANY bottled water companies in California — a wet dream (sigh) come true for our CA environmentalists.

    Reply this comment
  2. junior
    junior 11 January, 2016, 12:07

    Asinine – completely asinine. This amount of water is NOTHING!!

    Reply this comment
    • Sean
      Sean 11 January, 2016, 15:09

      Yup, 1 acre foot of water is ~3 million gallons so the 50 to 150 million gallons of water is 17 to 50 acre feet. California farmers consume 34 million acre feet of water annually or about 1 million times more than the bottling company.

      Reply this comment
      • Richard Rider
        Richard Rider 11 January, 2016, 15:38

        Solid point. Moreover, guess who consumes the water once bottled.

        Uhhhh, the Chinese?? Common sense fled our state in terror years ago.

        Reply this comment
        • tmaddison
          tmaddison 11 January, 2016, 18:02

          Yes, it’s picayune in the grand scheme of things. It’s all about theater, not about reality.

          Now, of course the entire world would be better off if people just filled reusable bottles from their tap – both environmentally and economically – but the marketing engines have convinced most that somehow getting your water from a bottle is better… Sad…

          Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Big water importers dealt minimal cutbacks

Gov. Jerry Brown has mandated an overall 25 percent reduction in urban water usage over the next nine months –

Referendums on passed legislation gain steam

Referendums on legislative actions may be making a comeback in California. Earlier this week, opponents of Senate Bill 277, the

Betty Yee declares victory in controller race

It isn’t over till it’s over, as Yoga Berra famously said. A recount still is possible. But Betty Yee has