Measure diverting bullet train funds for water storage hits money shortage, eyes 2018

Aerial view of Lake Shasta & dam with low water.

Aerial view of Lake Shasta & dam with low water.

Proponents of a ballot initiative that would divert high-speed rail funds to water storage projects announced on Friday that the cost of signature gathering was too great for the November ballot and set its sights on 2018 instead.

The measure would take $8 billion in unsold high-speed rail bonds and $2.7 billion from the 2014 water bond to fund new water storage projects while restructuring the oversight of those projects and prioritizing water usage in the state Constitution.

The reported cost of $5 per signature became prohibitive for the cash-strapped committee, which had raised only around $509,000 according to campaign finance disclosures. The committee reportedly has more than half of the 585,407 signatures it needs to qualify, which would cost a total of $3 million total at the current rate.

“With 300,000 collected signatures we are continuing our qualification efforts, but in a swollen field of potential 2016 ballot initiatives that are daily bidding up the cost of signature acquisition to astronomical levels, the committee is looking at its option of qualifying the measure for the 2018 cycle,” said Aubrey Bettencourt, chair of the California Water Alliance. “If we have all the signatures ready by the April 26th deadline for the 2016 ballot, we will submit.”

The proposal’s financial troubles are good news for opponents, who promptly ran victory laps. Tim Johnson, chairman of Stop the Special Interest Water Grab, called the measure a “trojan horse” that had “nothing to do with high-speed rail and everything to do with a massive water grab.”

The deadline for measures to make the November ballot is April 26, so the cost of signatures would likely drop significantly after that. The deadline for this measure to qualify for the 2018 ballot is July 25, 2016.

Read more:

Ballot initiative pits water against high-speed rail

How to run a ballot initiative campaign

 

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. ricky65
    ricky65 27 March, 2016, 09:09

    Anything that can derail the Brown Streak Vanity train boondoggle is a worthy cause.
    Five bucks per signature is ridiculous so maybe us grass roots folks can help. So I go over to the California Water Alliance website thinking I’ll download the petition, get a few signatures from friends & family and send it back to them muy pronto.
    Well it appears that you cannot download the petition directly. You have to contact the CWA directly for petitions.
    Maybe I just missed the direct download link. If not, this is a dumb way to run a ‘grassroots’ campaign.

    Reply this comment
  2. Dude
    Dude 27 March, 2016, 14:59

    Hmmm, what’s more important?

    1). Build a train-to-nowhere just to feed the ego of Gov. Phallic Head.
    2). Providing needed water capture/storage for all Californians

    Sounds pretty cut and dry to me…..
    Cut the choo choo so the rest of us won’t be dry.

    Reply this comment
  3. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 27 March, 2016, 16:46

    We need to grow crops more then we need some high speed railroad to accomidate Moonbeam and his fellow porkers and their Grand Pork Railroad

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Rail Firms Lack Accountability

NOV. 15, 2010 By ANTHONY PIGNATARO The California High-Speed Rail Authority really loves its contractors. It easily employs more than

NFL heavy hitters meet in AZ; continue momentum toward L.A. franchise

At a high-profile Phoenix, Ariz., gathering this week, NFL heavyweights sat down to smooth out the road toward a two-franchise deal in

Justice George's Free Press Legacy

OCT. 18, 2010 By TORI RICHARDS When California Chief Justice Ronald George retires at the end of the year, the