Pro sports nonprofits seek special exemption from state raffle rules
Professional sports franchises have a track record of securing special exemptions from environmental regulations, landing sweetheart bond financing deals and collecting direct government subsidies for stadiums.
Now, the nonprofit arms of these billion-dollar businesses are looking to gain a special exemption from the state’s rules on charitable fundraising.
A proposal speeding through the legislature would grant nonprofit organizations affiliated with professional sports franchises a special exemption from the state’s laws on charitable raffles.
Senate Bill 549, authored by state Sen. Isadore Hall, D-South Bay, would exempt nonprofits affiliated with sports franchises from Proposition 17, a 2000 ballot measure that allowed private nonprofit groups to conduct raffles. That voter-approved initiative requires 90 percent of a raffle’s proceeds to be spent on charitable purposes.
SB594 would allow sports-affiliated nonprofits to run a 50-50 raffle, where half of the proceeds can go to a gambler. According to the bill’s text, the only eligible organizations are those connected to “a team from the Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, National Basketball Association, National Football League, Women’s National Basketball Association, or Major League Soccer, or a private, nonprofit organization established by the Professional Golfers’ Association of America, Ladies Professional Golf Association, or National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing.”
Sports charity donates to California Legislative Black Caucus
Proponents of the special perk for sports franchises say that it encourages more philanthropic giving.
“Results of 50-50 charitable raffles in over 29 states have been tremendous,” Senator Hall, the bill’s author, recently testified before the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee. “This measure will supplement great charitable work done by professional sports franchises throughout the state.”
That charitable work includes a nonprofit organization managed by state lawmakers.
According to its most recent tax return, the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation has contributed $15,000 to the California Legislative Black Caucus. The current vice-chair of the Black Caucus is none other than Senator Isadore Hall, III — the author of SB 549.
Last session, Asm. Reginald Byron Jones-Sawyer Sr., the chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus, authored a nearly identical bill, AB 1691. Jones-Sawyer’s bill faced strong opposition from the state’s tribal groups, which saw it as encroaching on their turf.
“When you go from a 90-10 split to a 50-50 split, you’re moving away from charity to something more like a lottery,” David Quintana, a lobbyist for the California Tribal Business Alliance told the Los Angeles Times last year. “This is a huge change.”
Questionable spending by sports charities
In addition to benefiting nonprofits managed by state lawmakers, CalWatchdog.com’s review of California-based sports franchises found that their charitable entities frequently spend money on questionable activities that often benefit the underlying pro sports business.
According to the group’s tax return, the San Diego Chargers Charities spent nearly $40,000 to run its “Junior Charger Girls” program. The group’s noble charitable function: to teach girls aged seven to fifteen “the performance routine from the official Charger Girls Dance Team.” The nonprofit also spent $5,891 on football tickets.
In some cases, the sports nonprofits lose money on lavish fundraising events. The Los Angeles Lakers Youth Foundation spent $100,000 to a rent a golf course for a fundraiser that lost money, according to the nonprofit’s most recent tax return.
The Oakland Athletics Community Fund spent thousands of dollars on promotional-type events and fundraisers, including $65,525 for a golf tournament, $53,611 for a “bowling bash” and $9,654 for player appearances, according to the organization’s most recent tax return. That doesn’t include the $98,774 spent on “grants” to the Athletics Investment Group, LLC, the company that owns and operates the Oakland Athletics. The grants were for tickets to A’s home games, yet the organization did not acknowledge a relationship between the two entities in its tax filings.
Senate Bill 549: Sweetheart deal for sports nonprofits
“SB 549 lets professional sports teams and their foundations play by different rules than the rest of us,” CalNonprofits, a statewide advocacy group that represents more than 10,000 nonprofit organizations, wrote in opposition to the bill. “All other nonprofits – school bands, symphonies, humane societies, rotary clubs and food banks, and all the rest of us – would be limited to the current 90/10 rules, whether they prefer it or not. And that’s not fair.”
Because the bill amends a voter-approved initiative, it requires a two-thirds vote of both houses — giving Republican lawmakers rare power to influence public policy. The Republican Caucus’ analysis of the bill has raised concerns about the bill, especially its proposal to add a new $5,000 fee.
“There is a fee contained within this bill,” a Republican staff analysis of the bill warns lawmakers. “The bill requires eligible sports franchises, manufacturers and/or distributors of raffle related products and/or services to pay a $5,000 annual fee, in addition to a $100 fee for every individual raffle conducted at an eligible location to the DOJ in order to cover the administrative and enforcement provisions of the bill.”
Not a single lawmaker — Republican or Democrat — has voted against the bill.
1 commentWrite a comment
John Hrabe spends his time traveling the world as a freelance journalist. When he isn’t on an international flight, John writes about California politics for CalWatchdog.com and CalNewsroom.com.
There have been a number of efforts to increase the tax on sugary beverages in California in recent years,
Looking at the results of the California Business Roundtable/California Manufacturing & Technology Association poll on Senate Bill 350, the new