Car tax: Another call for boosting it

On Monday, I wrote a research piece on how the car tax cut in 2003 is not to  blame for California’s budget deficits. I cited a couple people blaming the cut for the deficits, and saying the old, high car tax should be brought back — which would almost double the tax from 1.15% of the car’s value to 2%.

While doing some research on another piece, I came across yet another article blaming the deficit on the car tax cut. Not surprisingly, it comes from the L.A. Times’ Michael Hiltzik, who never met a tax he didn’t want to double — or triple. During last year’s campaign on the May 19 tax increases on the ballot, Hiltzik’s tax fetish was many times on the John & Ken radio show on KFI640 in Los Angeles. (Radio excerpts here; search for “Hiltzik” and several will come up.)

Hiltzik now writes:

The biggest cause of the state deficit, currently about $20 billion, is Schwarzenegger, who hollowed out the revenue stream by $5 billion to $6 billion a year by cutting the car tax in 2003 without coming up with a substitute.

But as I noted in my piece,

Tom McClintock, now a U.S. congressman, told me that raising the car tax at first hurt the state budget. He pointed to budget figures (Schedule 6, Appendix Page 13 of this .pdf) showing that, from fiscal 2001-02, general fund revenues rose more than $8 billion, to $80.6 billion. By contrast, the next year, fiscal 2003-04, which included the car-tax increase, general fund revenues dropped almost $4 billion, to $76.8 billion.

Then, cutting the car tax back in 2003 actually was “a big economic stimulus for California, particularly in car buying.” When the car tax fell off in 2004-05, revenues rose again, more than $5 billion, to $82.2 billion.

Much of these changes involved not just the particular tax increase or tax cut, but the whole tax climate – whether the statewide trend was for higher or lower tax burdens. McClintock called it the “dynamic impact” of taxes.

Hiltzik, like so many other tax increasers, seems to think that, when you grab people’s money, they just sit there and take it. No. They react. They try to avoid the taxes, by stopping buying cars or other taxed items, or by leaving the state or country. Or, as commonly is the case with cigarettes, they buy smokes on the black market.

— John Seiler

No comments

Write a comment
  1. stevefromsacto
    stevefromsacto 5 February, 2010, 12:08

    We have a huge budget crisis. Your solutions: Force hundreds of thousands of elderly, blind and disabled Californians out of homecare and into nursing homes–which will cost taxpayers five times more than homecare. Eliminate opportunities for poor welfare recipients to find work or get the training needed to get off welfare. Throw hundreds of thousands of homecare providers out of work–without even considering what impact that will have on local economies.

    But don’t DARE put the car tax back to what it was in 2003–an increase of less than 1 percent.

    I LOVE you guys! You may not give a damn about the poor and sick, but you are always predictable.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Related Articles

SoCal job growth slows

“California’s back!” is Gov. Jerry Brown’s re-election slogan. Certainly, in some areas, such as Silicon Valley, where the Great Recession

CA greens pretend fracking’s past like an ‘X File’ coverup

@chrisreed99: Many #Fracking practices are secret including but not limited to chemicals. Covered-UP extensively starting in 70s. @TXsharon — Andrea

LAT, Sac Bee fracking coverage: Same old glaring omission

Here we go again. On Friday, the state government released its draft fracking regulations. And while in their coverage, the