We're thinking Meg's pleased…

jbrown

In a time when everyone’s talking about what Attorney Jerry Brown hasn’t talked about (namely, when he’s going to announce his candidacy for governor), it’s nice to find something concerning what he actually is talking about. Check out this San Francisco Bay Guardian piece on Brown’s Feb. 17 speech before the Sierra Club’s San Francisco Bay Chapter. You know it’s going to be a good story when the words “rambling,” “vague,” “aghast” and “often pointless” appear in the first paragraph.

“Brown has never been a dynamic speaker, but the unscripted, half-hour speech… illustrates the danger of letting a primary be decided by legend and money rather than political persuasion,” reporter Steven T. Jones wrote.

The big story so far has been Republican Meg Whitman’s near-absolute refusal to talk the press. But given the following excerpt, we can only conclude that Brown — who was California’s governor from 1975 to 1983 — might want to take a page from her playbook:

“During that period when I was governor, I’m not going to call it the golden age because some people think I’m in the golden, so I don’t want people to get confused. That’s why I don’t want to talk about way back then, because there are a number of people I can see weren’t even born then, so it gets a little embarrassing and I like to pretend it was just yesterday. But in that period, California created almost twice as many jobs as the nation did…”

-Anthony Pignataro

No comments

Write a comment
  1. EastBayLarry
    EastBayLarry 19 February, 2010, 19:35

    I really hope neither Meg nor Jerry are elected, as neither has a clue as to how jobs are created.

    Reply this comment
  2. stevefromsacto
    stevefromsacto 20 February, 2010, 11:11

    You’re half right, Larry. E(exaggerated) Meg claims she knows how to create jobs. Yet she calls for laying off more than 40,000 state employees. Huh?

    Gov. Schwarzenegger, who had on-the-job training as governor (just like EMeg would if elected), proposes throwing nearly 400,000 low-wage homecare providers out of work. The last time I checked, these people all paid taxes and contributed to state and local economies. So this will help the economy how?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Related Articles

Iowa might not be so attractive for CA businesses

Feb. 21, 2013 By John Seiler Long Beach still sometimes is called “Iowa Beach” because so many people from that

CalWatchdog Morning Read – December 29

Short-term pain with ACA repeal CA wall of debt Brown taps two top advisors for CPUC posts Former Lt. Gov.

‘Violence is as American as apple pie’

Jan. 30, 2013 By Katy Grimes The Senate and Assembly held a joint Public Safety committee hearing on Tuesday about