State Workers Angry At Me!

Katy Grimes: A story I wrote last week (State Printer Decides Election Date?) about the Office of State Printing being able to make decisions about future election dates based on printing schedules, created a stir when I suggested that Gov. Jerry Brown should consider cutting the agency as a budget-savings measure.

Within hours, my editor Steven Greenhut received a strange email from someone on a state government Department of General Services email address, that read “Charlie: tell them what you know about Katie Grimes [sic] when you get on your home computer!

I remembered that I worked with person by the same name on the address at my husband’s commercial printing company, which is now closed, although I don’t know if it’s the same person.

Within hours of receiving the email, Eric Lamoreaux, the acting deputy director and spokesman for the Department of General Services, also sent an email to my editor and me, stating that the state printer is not responsible for printing ballots. We included Lamoreaux’s information on the story.

Greenhut asked Lamoreaux about the email and he responded in an email as follows: “I have no idea. Looks like someone’s note to themselves that they accidently copied you on. Thanks for sharing.” He didn’t seem concerned by something like this being sent on an official DGS email account.

And then Monday while I was sitting at a lunch table along with 20 affordable housing activists, in the sixth floor cafeteria at the Capitol, a call came in on my cell phone from a “restricted” number – usually that’s how a call from a state agency appears on the phone screen. The caller did not identify herself as a state employee, but told me that I don’t know what I am writing about and need to stop.

She threatened that state employees were going to be getting even with me soon in an “open forum” confrontation in public. I’m looking forward to any open discussion about this topic.

I asked her if she was calling about my recent story about office of State Printing. She denied it, but in the next breath began to talk excitedly about evil “private printers,” and how great the state printer was. This is fine — we get positive and critical phone calls all the time, although the caller did make reference to my husband’s company.

On the story, the comments left by state printing employees were unusually personal, and referred to my husband’s printing company.

I can appreciate that state employees are fearful that jobs, salaries and/or benefits may be cut given the state’s severe budget troubles, but we watched as our printing business went under during these tough economic times. Government employees who work in print shops don’t have to worry about making payroll or building business in this highly regulated and highly taxed state.

They are angry, but it’s the state’s taxpayers and small-business owners who have the real right to be angry about the current state of affairs.

MARCH 9,  2011

No comments

Write a comment
  1. John Seiler
    John Seiler 9 March, 2011, 11:20

    Typical thuggish government union behavior. These are our public “servants”?

    Reply this comment
  2. larry 62
    larry 62 9 March, 2011, 11:34

    Seems as though Katy hit a very sensitive nerve.

    Reply this comment
  3. Tylerle13
    Tylerle13 9 March, 2011, 12:31

    You would be shocked at what a mob is willing to do when their gravy train is threatened.

    Reply this comment
  4. StevefromSacto
    StevefromSacto 9 March, 2011, 15:45

    “You would be shocked at what a mob is willing to do when their gravy train is threatened.”

    You’re absolutely right. That’s why I’m so afraid of the Tea Party.

    Reply this comment
  5. John Steele
    John Steele 11 March, 2011, 07:38

    Another god reason to have Wisconsin style regulation of our out of control Unions and agencies. These types think we exsist to pay for the government instead of them serving us. Once the goodie train is threatened, they go into thug mode.

    Reply this comment
  6. Tom Ellis
    Tom Ellis 6 April, 2011, 12:34


    The whole premise of your blog was wrong. Maybe that is why someone would be upset. If you had the facts, you would not have a story.

    AGAIN, the state printed does not decide the election date. You are wrong, get over it.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

New criminal justice reform focus: Harsh bail laws

The same coalition of Democratic lawmakers and interest groups that worked with Gov. Jerry Brown on Propositions 47 and 57

Mass. Dems Might Curb Union Power

John Seiler: When Republicans in Wisconsin and Ohio took away some collective-bargaining rights of government-worker unions, we were warned that

UC drops investments in response to activists’ gripes

For the second time in three months, University of California pension administrators have ended their investments in specific industries after