Jerry Brown’s deficit teeter-totter game

May 23, 2012

By Wayne Lusvardi

Imagine a teeter-totter with a chubby boy on one end and a thin boy on the other.  The teeter-totter can be balanced either by two chubby boys or two thin boys.  It can be balanced heavy or balanced light — either way will work.

Under Proposition 58, California is required to balance its budget.  California Gov. Jerry Brown wants you to believe that the California budget needs to be balanced heavy or high. That is apparently how he is coming up with his $16 billion state budget deficit. It is not a lie to say the budget needs $16 billion to be balanced — however, it is possible that the budget could be balanced without the $16 billion.

Even the State Legislative Analyst now acknowledges there is no need to cut $5.5 billion from the K-12 school budget.  This statement essentially undermines the need for Brown’s $8.5 billion tax increase on the November ballot.

Composition of the General Fund

There are several pots that make up the state budget. Brown wants you to look at the pot of the state operating-budget — called the general fund — shown in Column 1 in the table below.  The general fund has declined only about 10 percent, or a total of $10 billion, since the peak of the Mortgage Bubble in 2007.  The prior reported state budget deficit was estimated to be just about ten billion dollars. But Brown now says the falling tax revenues have made the general fund budget deficit increase to $16 billion.

Sales and income tax receipts have reportedly declined.  But total expenditures including Federal fund transfers have increased 8.1 percent, or a total of $15.84 billion, from 2007 to 2012 (see Column 7 below).

Overall state spending in California is up, even though some components of the budget have decreased.

The “general fund” (Column 1 in table below) can be gamed to the point where it is meaningless.  As writer Alyssia Finley of the Wall Street Journal writes in her article “Will California Ever Learn”:

“For the past several years legislators have been using special funds [fees earmarked for special purposes –- see Column 2 below] to pay for programs that are usually financed by general fund spending.”  This is what the term “fungible” means –- the funds can be applied to several categories.

The best number to look at is Gross Spending Minus Federal Funds (Column 5 below).  Based on that, the state budget is running less than a $1 billion –- or 0.5 percent –- shortfall.  That is without considering President Obama’s and California Attorney General Kamela Harris’s $18 billion foreclosure bailout for California.  Brown is diverting about $410 million of that bailout into the general fund.

Moreover, according to the state Department of Finance website, 85 percent of the $749.5 billion in General Fund Deficiencies – or $635.1 million – are in Medi-Cal.

Public education is not shown as running a deficiency. The apparent reason is that public schools “sell well” with middle-class taxpayers while Medi-Cal can’t be sold to the public as convincingly.

The California budget is teetering — but Its imbalance is caused by chubby-boy spending, not skinny tax receipts.

Historical Budget Expenditures

Fiscal Year (1)General Fund (2)Special Funds (3)Totals (4)Bond Funds  (5)
Budget Totals
w/out Federal Funds
(6)Federal Funds (7)Expenditure

Totals Including Federal Funds

(8)Special Fund For Economic Uncertain-ties
2007-08 102.985 26.673 129.659 8.405 138.065 56.211 194.276 1.296
2008-09 90.940 23.843 114.784 7.601 122.386 73.089 195.475 -7.391
2009-10 87.236 23.514 110.750 6.250 117.000 89.088 206.089 -6.112
2010-11 91.549 33.432 124.981 6.000 130.981 84.764 215.745 -3.797
2011-12 86.512 35.587 122.100 13.141 135.241 78.703 213.945 -1.704
2012-13 92.553 39.824 132.377 4.950 137.327 72.784 210.112 1.131
Change in Dollars -$10.4 +$13.15 +$32.38 -$3,455  $738 +16.573 +$15.84  0.17
Percent Change Minus10.1% Plus51.6% Plus2.1% Minus41% Minus0.5% Plus
29.5%
Plus8.1% Minus12.7%
Source: California Department of Finance


Related Articles

LAO report: $1.3 billion state building plan lacks oversight

The $1.3 billion first phase of a project to build and modernize 11 state office buildings lacks adequate accountability and oversight and

Inflation could quickly erode CalPERS pensions

CalPERS retirees could be in for a surprise. The California Public Employment Retirement System payments include a 2 percent inflation increase

Japan Quake Shaking CA Economy

MARCH 15, 2011 BY JOHN SEILER In the long run, California’s economy probably will not be greatly affected by the