Stockton police chief rips off $204K pension

Aug. 6, 2012

By John Seiler

Highway robbery was supposed to be illegal in California. But after just eight months on the job, Stockton Police Chief Tom Morris grabbed a $204,000 pension. No wonder state pension funds now require hefty infusions of cash from taxpayers — and soon will go broke. Bloomberg writes that Morris was:

“the third of four chiefs who stayed in the position for less than three years and retired with an average of 92 percent of their final salaries.

“Stockton, which filed for bankruptcy protection on June 28, is among California cities from the Mexican border to the San Francisco Bay confronting rising pension costs as they contend with growing unemployment and declining property- and sales-tax revenue. The pensions are the consequence of decisions made when stock markets were soaring, technology money flooded the state, and retirement funds were running surpluses.

“’We didn’t have very many people looking out for the taxpayers when these deals were negotiated,’” San Jose Mayor Chuck Reed, 63, said in a telephone interview. San Jose, the state’s third-largest city, approved a ballot measure in June to contain annual retirement costs that soared to $245 million from $73 million in the past decade.

It’s all a total ripoff. Here’s what we should do: If taxpayers are on the hook, limit public-employee retiree pensions to $60,000 a year, about the median income in California. Any retiree should be able to survive on that. Some of these retired cops might have to sell their ranches in Montana. But they’ll still be doing OK.

Does the California Constitution supposedly guarantee such mammoth, ripoff pensions? Some authorities say it does, some say it doesn’t. In any case, it could be reinterpreted. Or changed. Or ignored.

The California Constitution begins:

“All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.”

Certainly, taxing us to death and bankrupting our cities to pay exorbitant pensions to retirees violates the right to “enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.”

Editor’s Note: This blog was corrected to read “Stockton” in all instances, instead of another city in two instances. Thanks to our readers for pointing it out.


Related Articles

Slower Than a Speeding Bullet

Anthony Pignataro: The California High-Speed Rail Authority really needs to work on its social media skills. On Aug. 2 the

It's All Free!

John Seiler: California’s Supreme Court yesterday ruled that illegal immigrants can get in-state tuition at state universities and colleges. But

Homage to Catalonia independence

Is there still hope for the Six Californias initiative of entrepreneur Tom Draper? This year it failed to get enough