Some minority L.A. Dems realize unions are dubious allies

March 12, 2013

By Chris Reed

The hegemony of Democrats in California is based to a striking degree on the ability of public employee unions — whose leaders and most affluent members are predominantly white — to keep minorities on board even though “social justice” means sharply different things to teachers union members and to most Latinos, African-Americans and Asian-Americans.

This task is made easier by many Republicans, whose views on immigration and English-only policies and whose nostalgia about the way California used to be can easily be depicted as nativist fear of the other. Even as Democratic stewardship of the state’s economy has created the longest sustained unemployment in 70 years, the GOP’s horrible image has insulated Democrats from losing minority votes.

That’s the bad news. The good news is that at least some minority politicians are beginning to figure out that a party primarily devoted to preserving the jobs, automatic pay hikes and generous pensions of public employees is a party that’s not necessarily interested in what’s best for minorities.

Jan Perry Los Angeles City CouncilAfrican-American Councilwoman warns about union power

The latest is Los Angeles City Councilwoman Jan Perry, an African-American progressive who pushes for green regulations and nanny-state causes but is also a budget hawk.

Perry lost last week’s mayoral primary after a campaign in which  she criticized the other two Democratic candidates — L.A. Councilman Eric Garcetti and L.A. Controller Wendy Greuel, who are both white — for their subservience to labor. Garcetti has tight ties with the SEIU; Greuel works closely with the police and fire unions.  In a weekend interview with the Los Angeles Times, Perry offered a distinctly Republican-sounding critique of the effects that raw union power and union-bankrolled candidates have on local government:

“Voters ‘need to examine what that will mean to them,’ Perry said. ‘They should look at where the money in this campaign comes from and think about if they want to have greater control of their public utility, for instance. Otherwise, if they don’t pay attention, they will be completely rolled over.

“‘Because that is what is at risk here, at great risk,’ she continued. Having someone too closely allied with employee unions in the mayor’s office could mean ‘the death of independent politics altogether. It could mean the only way you get elected in this town is if you get money from unions.'”

Gloria RomeroPoor schools for Latinos defined as civil-rights issue

Preceding Perry in realizing that union interests are often inimical to minorities’ interests was another Los Angeles Democrat, Gloria Romero, herself a former union member when she worked as a college professor.

As state senator, Romero  saw teachers unions sabotage reforms over and over again and fight relentlessly for policies that put veteran teachers at the safest, whitest schools and put the least experienced teachers at the poorest schools — often teachers who taught classes for which they didn’t even have the proper credentials. Romero lost so many battles — and saw so many Latino kids failed by L.A. Unified — that she ended up dropping a bomb, likening the fight to improve poor schools to a battle over civil rights.

For her candor, Romero was rewarded with a vicious California Teachers Association attack campaign that depicted her as “dangerous” and killed her 2010 bid to be superintendent of public instruction. The CTA’s choice, Tom Torlakson, has been just what the CTA wanted and just what reformers feared: a guardian of the status quo, right down to sticking up for school districts using 30-year borrowing on basic supplies and equipment so as to free up operating budget funds for teacher compensation.

Now Gov. Jerry Brown has essentially put all Latino elected officials in the Legislature and on local school boards on the spot by proposing a dramatic change in school funding policies to give more money to schools with most students with lagging language skills.

Brown says it is crucial to the future of California that these students, often Latinos, graduate high school with solid job skills.

jerry-brown-official-portraitGov. Brown to Latino lawmakers: Whose side are you on?

This is not going to be an issue that Assembly Speaker John Perez — heretofore a CTA and CFT bosom buddy — necessarily can finesse. If the teacher unions try to kill Brown’s plan so as to maintain a funding status quo designed to create the most comfort for veteran teachers, Perez will have to take a stand.

Does he care most about keeping the teacher unions happy? Or about the hundreds of thousands of Latino schoolkids whom Brown hopes to help?

We shall see. But here’s hoping that not just Romero, but the state media in general, frames this issue as it should be framed: Just what do elected California Democrats define as “social justice”?

Helping teacher unions?

Or helping disadvantaged Latino students?

This could be the defining moment that California politics has badly needed since public employee union power metastasized after Gov. Pete Wilson left office in 1999.


Write a comment
  1. Hondo
    Hondo 12 March, 2013, 10:28

    As the money runs out, the welfare class will take arms against the public union class. Because the public unions get first dibs on any state revenue, it is the welfare money that will be cut first. Now that’s a food fight I’d pay to see.

    Reply this comment
  2. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 12 March, 2013, 12:55

    Good read, Jan Perry sounds refreshing, unlike Torklalson, who is a complete piece of s*&T, corrupt and committed to preserving the status quo. Backdoor Johnnie, we know how he stands, no way he is changing position(pun intended).

    Reply this comment
  3. Ted Steele, Navigator
    Ted Steele, Navigator 12 March, 2013, 13:41

    LOL Honda— you have it all figured out! It’s all about class warfare with you. It’s ironic thopugh that you promote the class above you against the poor! You’re what the architects of the Russian revolution called, ” a useful idiot “….The billionaires and chamber of commerce dolts LOVE marks like you…LMAO!

    Reply this comment
  4. Ted Steele, Navigator
    Ted Steele, Navigator 12 March, 2013, 13:42

    Hey– when does your little buddy Rex the Poodle get out of jail?

    Reply this comment
  5. Donkey
    Donkey 12 March, 2013, 14:44

    Hondo, it will start with the police and fire battling the other government bureaucracies for taxpayers dollars, and then with the police and fire battling each other.In between your senario will take place. Not unlike the life of a star, all be it shorter in span, in the end all will explode because is has run out of fuel, or in the case of the RAGWUS money. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  6. Donkey
    Donkey 12 March, 2013, 14:45

    Poor Teddy Steals, trapped in his RAGWUS bubble, unable to see the truth!! 🙂

    Reply this comment
  7. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 13 March, 2013, 00:01

    A little bird told me Rex won’t be back here for years.

    Reply this comment
  8. Al Moncrief
    Al Moncrief 13 March, 2013, 09:06


    The Colorado Court of Appeals has reversed and remanded an initial District Court ruling that denied the contractual status of public pension COLAs in Colorado. The Court of Appeals confirmed that Colorado PERA pension COLA benefits are a contractual obligation of the pension plan Colorado PERA and its affiliated public employers. A huge victory for public sector retirees in Colorado! The Colorado Legislature may not breach its contracts and push taxpayer obligations onto the backs of a small group of elderly pensioners.

    The lawsuit is continuing. Support pension rights in the U.S. by contributing at Friend Save Pera Cola on Facebook!

    In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court (in U.S. Trust Co, 431 U.S.) clarified that state attempts to impair their own contracts, ESPECIALLY FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS, were subject to greater scrutiny and very little deference because the STATE’S SELF-INTEREST IS AT STAKE. As the court bluntly stated:

    “A governmental entity can always find a use for extra money, especially when taxes do not have to be raised. If a state could reduce its financial obligations whenever it wanted to spend the money for what it regarded as an important public purpose, the Contract Clause would provide no protection at all . . . Thus, a state cannot refuse to meet its legitimate financial obligations simply because it would prefer to spend the money to promote the public good rather than the private welfare of its creditors.”

    For more resources to protect public pension benefits visit

    Reply this comment
  9. eatingdogfood
    eatingdogfood 13 March, 2013, 14:42

    If The Democrats Didn’t Give ” Sweetheart Deals ” To Your Public Service Union.
    Goon Employees To Get Reelected; You Would Have Plenty Of Money and The.
    Taxpayer would have Some Spare Change in His Pockets! Democratic Hustler
    Politicians + Corrupt Union Goons = BANKRUPTCY BABY! Time To Bring.
    RICO Conspiracy Charges Against The Hustler Corrupt Democrats and the.
    Criminal Unions!

    Reply this comment
  10. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 13 March, 2013, 20:05

    EDF: You obvioulsy need a lot of cheese to wash down that constant whine. Be careful, or you are going to choke.

    Reply this comment
  11. PJ
    PJ 14 March, 2013, 22:32

    My relatives, all educated professionals, did not know that union dues and deducted from paychecks of public employees and then sent to Dem campaign PACS.

    Did. Not. Know.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Jerry's back!

Here’s the text of the e-mail the Jerry Brown campaign just sent out to “supporters”: Dear Supporter, Today, I am

Gov. Brown announces re-election bid under rain

Last Friday, Gov. Jerry Brown officially launched his re-election campaign. Of course, filing the paperwork was a formality for a man

Kashkari is the GOP establishment’s choice

I just got another flyer from Neil Kashkari, the fourth so far. See the images below. It’s similar to the first flyer, which I