Is there ever any positive news about the bullet train?

April 4, 2013

By Chris Reed

train_wreck_num_2Is there ever any hard, legit good news about the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s plan to build a state bullet-train network?

The stories last week about the U.S. Government Accountability Office depicting CHSRA’s ridership estimates as reasonable were only positive if you ignored all the GAO commentary about the unlikelihood of the full bullet-train network being built.

Now comes the San Jose Mercury-News with yet another batch of bullet-train bad news:

“While much of the squabbling over California’s high-speed rail project has focused on its huge construction price tag, the cost to taxpayers just to plan the bullet train is also soaring.

“California rail leaders said Tuesday it will cost an extra $97 million in office and field work to design the rail line, which has famously seen its construction cost double to $69 billion since voters approved it five years ago. The extra state and federal funds set aside for planning will wind up in the pockets of private consulting firms, including some that earn billions of dollars in annual revenue.

“Rail officials say much of the latest increase is because of delays to the project’s aggressive timeline and the need to study alternative plans aimed at appeasing concerns of communities along the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles rail corridor.

“For instance, the California High-Speed Rail Authority board Thursday is set to approve an extra $38 million for mega-firm URS to work on clearing state and federal bureaucratic hurdles required before construction can begin in the Central Valley this summer. That $158 million effort dates back six years and was supposed to be done by now, but has been delayed because residents between Fresno and Bakersfield have asked the state to study different locations to lay tracks, a time-consuming and costly endeavor.

“Rail officials say the new pre-construction planning budget of $878 million, while an increase of 12 percent, is still within the limit approved by voters in 2008.”

So here’s the challenge to the Robert Cruickshanks of California: Where are the stories that will make the voters who backed Prop 1A in 2008 think they did the right thing? Where are the stories that will make those voters think that California providing $9.95 billion in bond seed money made any sense?

Bob? Bob? Bob?

 

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Hank
    Hank 4 April, 2013, 07:52

    Go back when URS was awarded the contract. Guess whose husband was on the board of URS, give up? DiFi. This is the same senator who didn’t realise she was conflicted when voting on building contracts for DoD. The reason was her husbands firm. Because she was due to leave the committee it was decided “no harm, no foul”. The ignorance defense.
    Our government is so warm and cozy, for some.

    Reply this comment
  2. Hondo
    Hondo 4 April, 2013, 10:17

    Just to get from Bakersfield to LA will cost the entire budget, I’m guessing. That route is gonna be like something from the movie ‘Bridge over the River Kwai’. 6 stories high, at least, going 200mph. Over the San Andreas fault line, among several other faults. That’s not an engineering marvel, that would be a miracle.
    And the California condors are supposed to ignore those dead rabbits on the tracks? You’d have to gut the EPA to build this thing.
    Did someone put some good laughing acid in the koolaid our leaders are drinking?
    Hondo……

    Reply this comment
  3. Sean Morham
    Sean Morham 4 April, 2013, 13:15

    Crockofx8ft is described as a policy wonk. Is that the same thing as an ahole?

    Reply this comment
  4. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon 4 April, 2013, 18:34

    Cruikshank, the world’s foremost expert, lives in Seattle.

    Reply this comment
  5. Who supports California high speed rail?
    Who supports California high speed rail? 5 April, 2013, 07:45

    News coverage is usually bad, but these politically powerful corporations and unions can shove the bullet train through the hapless Central Valley anyway:

    http://californiahighspeedrailscam.com/top-40-donors-to-main-campaign-committee-to-convince-california-voters-to-borrow-10-billion-to-start-building-high-speed-rail-proposition-1a-november-2008/

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

CalWatchdog Morning Read – April 22, 2016

Education division widening. Guns, gasses and high-speed rail   By CALWATCHDOG STAFF Good morning and happy Friday! Last week’s ruling

‘We are now Europe!’

Jan. 30, 2013 By Katy Grimes Rick Santelli, my favorite vociferous and opinionated financial news guru, today said that with

Will "Going Green" Backfire?

With nearly every politician — from city councils to state legislators, governors  and congress – embracing green technology as the