Audit uncovers embers in Cal Fire slush fund

Audit uncovers embers in Cal Fire slush fund

Cal Fire truck and shed, from state audit reportA new state audit shows that in 2005 a secret, $3.66 million off-the-books account was established by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The Wildlife Fire Investigation Training and Equipment Fund, a private, nonprofit account, was filled through lawsuit settlement proceeds. The fund was run by the California District Attorneys Association until it was shut down on April 10, 2013.

Other highlights from the new audit of Cal Fire by the Office of State Audits and Evaluations of the Department of Finance:

* Cal Fire “did not have specific statutory authority to establish the Fund and did not request or obtain Finance authorization to establish this account outside” the Centralized Treasury system.

* Of the $3.66 million collected in the slush fund, “$2.4 million was expended.”

* Cal Fire’s “decentralized process for the Civil Cost Recovery Program increases the risk of lost or stolen goods.”

* Established state procurement and inventory processes were not followed”; and neither the California District Attorneys Association nor Cal Fire claims “ownership of $1.7 million of equipment and software items purchased with the fund.”

Slush funds are becoming a trend in state government. The Cal Fire audit was published a little more than a year after the discovery of the $54 million State Parks hidden fund last year. In that scandal, the State Parks Department claimed budget cutbacks justified increases in park entrance fees and monetary help from volunteer groups.

Uncovering the dirt

Cal Fire has the authority under the California Health and Safety Code to recover costs for fighting fires and providing rescue or emergency medical services — despite the fees and taxes, and the new fire tax California residents already pay. This money was supposed to be deposited in the state’s general fund.

“Cal Fire Director Ken Pimlott told The Bee he never knew the $3.66 million fund was cloaked from state leaders and the Department of Finance,” the Sacramento Bee reported in January. “Cal Fire froze the account last year and scheduled it for dissolution in February at the request of the prosecutors’ group.”Pimlott_Med

When news of fund first were reported, Pimlott claimed media coverage was “incomplete and sensational, and over time, truth would prevail,” the Los Angeles Times reported in January. He even went out on a limb and said those who attacked the fund would have their motives exposed.

The new state audit contradicts his earlier statements.

Pimlott now claims that Cal Fire officials believed they had the authority to set up the fund account. But according to the Times story, documents from 2008 show Cal Fire officials were aware of problems with the fund and were concerned that, if the fund were discovered, the Department of Finance would demand that Cal Fire place the money with the state treasury.

When the Department of Finance auditor asked for the legal reasoning for establishing the off-the-books fund, Cal Fire officials referred the question to the office of Attorney General Kamala Harris. However, the Attorney General’s office legally represents Cal Fire.

The Audit

The Department of Finance audit also condemned Cal Fire’s failure to even track the settlement monies. According to the audit, managers of the Cal Fire program did not even know how many settlement cases were involved, nor did they know how much money the agency received from the settlements. Auditors concluded that there was a heightened “risk of money being either lost, stolen or both.”

“A California fire account hidden from state lawmakers paid for $22,000 in metal detectors, $30,000 in GPS units — and $33,000 for a conference at a Pismo Beach resort, according to a spreadsheet released Tuesday showing expenses dating back to 2011,” the Bee reported.

The $3.6 million dollars in the Cal Fire fund was spent as follows:

* $766,000 for training;

* Nearly $374,000 to the District Attorneys Association in management fees;

* $1.7 million on equipment for which, as noted above, no inventory was kept.

Sen. Ted Gaines, R-Rocklin, called for an investigation last January into the state officials behind the slush fund account, but his request fell on deaf ears.

11 comments

Write a comment
  1. Sonoffar
    Sonoffar 10 September, 2013, 13:46

    This is the same Cal Fire that requires us to pay them a special tax because we live in an area they claim is their jurisdiction. How much of that tax assessment money slips between the cracks and finds it’s way to someones personal slush fund?

    Reply this comment
  2. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 10 September, 2013, 15:15

    ……heroes…..

    (..reaches for barf bag)

    Reply this comment
  3. TR Bolton
    TR Bolton 10 September, 2013, 17:48

    What a bunch od s___t! You guys are as corrupt as our politicians!
    Used to be my heroes. Reconsidering now!

    Reply this comment
  4. suqs2bu
    suqs2bu 11 September, 2013, 08:22

    When I was a kid we called this:
    FRAUD
    LARCENY
    THEFT
    EMBEZZLEMENT

    The entire bunch involved belongs in prison for LIFE

    Reply this comment
  5. The Ted Steele Conceptual Abstraction Unit
    The Ted Steele Conceptual Abstraction Unit 12 September, 2013, 08:56

    What a bunch of nothing– Katy– could you please work on more cat adoption articles?

    Seems like a technical violation if that with no intent to use the money in an untoward fashion.

    The Ted Unit

    Reply this comment
  6. Katy Grimes
    Katy Grimes Author 12 September, 2013, 11:19

    No Ted, it’s not a bunch of nothing. Nor is it a technical violation. Take a look at the auditor’s report. The account was deliberately taken out of the treasury, which is as illegal as it gets for any fund involving public money.

    Cal Fire doesn’t even know where the equipment they bought with the funds is located. They can’t provide an inventory of what was purchased.

    Katy

    Reply this comment
  7. Left of Rio Linda
    Left of Rio Linda 13 September, 2013, 06:39

    Following in the footsteps of “FEMA”, biggest slush fund ever. Put a section of the populace in a “flood zone” that has no exposure to flooding and reap a 100% profit in “mandated” flood insurance. Squeeze $800 to $1400 a year out of a homeowner for 10 years before some one catches on, then they have two years to revise the map.

    Reply this comment
  8. Rex the Wonderdog!
    Rex the Wonderdog! 13 September, 2013, 13:25

    The Ted Steele Conceptual Abstraction Unit says:
    September 12, 2013 at 8:56 am
    What a bunch of nothing– Katy– could you please work on more cat adoption articles?
    =========LOL @ “kat adoption articles”…..Katy, don’t let Teddy bully you 😉

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

VIDEO: Dinesh D’Souza: A World Without America

What would the world look like if the spirit of 1776 hadn’t shaped the West? Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza talks to

California tops ‘worst run cities’ list

Jan. 17, 2013 By Katy Grimes Surprise! Sacramento is on another list of ‘worst run cities’ in the nation. The

Really, CA legislators are brain trusts!

JUNE 24, 2011 By ALI MEYER California legislators can’t seem to get a balanced budget passed or fix the state