Caltrans greenlights bike lane expansion

bike laneBending to legislative prodding from Sacramento, California’s transportation bureaucracy has moved ahead with statewide plans to standardize and expand the Golden State’s bike lanes.

Despite persistent criticism from bike-friendly advocacy groups like the Green Lane Project, Caltrans opted against such sweeping measures. In 2014, however, Democratic officials decided to change that:

“Last year, the state’s legislature passed the Protected Bikeways Act of 2014, removing the de facto blockage and telling Caltrans to create statewide standards for protected bike lanes. Now, with the support of Gov. Jerry Brown and Caltrans Director Malcolm Dougherty, the agency is following through with such enthusiasm that it’s drawing praise from bikeway design pros.”

When Gov. Brown signed the bill into law, supporters hailed the move as a giant leap in mainstreaming bicycle usage statewide. “This is a game changer for bike infrastructure in California,” said Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, the bill’s sponsor. “Sharing the road is one thing but designing it better is another thing altogether.  By changing our streets, cycling can finally become a realistic transportation option for millions of Californians held back by safety concerns.”

For decades, the expansion of bike lanes has been a project most closely associated in California with Democrats. In addition to making the roads more accessible for mobile nature lovers, bike lanes have long been touted as a way to help decrease reliance on cars — reducing their environmental impact while also likely habituating residents to more often consider using public transportation.

But recently, some Democrat-sponsored initiatives have inspired some head-scratching. In the Assembly, Kansen Chu, D-San Jose, had to take AB 28 back to the drawing board when critics questioned its requirement that cyclists utilize a flashing white light during nighttime hours.

Republican innovation

Typically, Republican interest in bike lane issues has been thought of as largely car-centric. Recently, for instance, Assemblyman Frank Bigelow, R-O’Neals, drafted AB 208, a bill designed to help alleviate driver uncertainty about how to pass cyclists safely.

But in a surprise offering, Assemblywoman Kristin Olsen, R-Modesto, recently unveiled a plan to expand the modes of transportation eligible for bike lane usage. Soon to receive a committee hearing, AB 604 would authorize stakeboarders with electric motors to ride anywhere bicycles are permitted.

“Electrically-motorized skateboards are a safe and eco-friendly mode of transportation for commuters,” Olsen said in a statement posted to her website, “yet current law bans them from being ridden in California.”

“The ban was implemented in 1977 to keep noisy, gas-powered boards off the streets, but boards built today are quiet, clean and safe to ride. Despite the restriction, manufacturers of these boards continue to invest in our state by developing and building their products here.  The industry is growing world-wide – so it’s time to modernize California law to support this emerging technology.”

Although manufacturers of electrically-powered skateboards quickly voiced their favor, according to Capital Public Radio, cyclists groups seemed ready to consider embracing their would-be fellow travelers. “The California Bicycle Coalition says it wants to ensure bike lanes don’t get too crowded,” CPR reported, “but other than that, it likes the idea.”

Scattered opposition

The popularity of bike lanes — and the push among legislators to promote their use — has been traced back to California roots in the city of Davis. There, in the mid-1960s, city council leaders and University of California-Davis professors created a coalition able to design, approve, and implement a network of lanes now totaling some 150 miles’ worth.

Today, however, bike lanes still haven’t secured unanimous support. “The expansion of bike lanes in Los Angeles can make motorists feel a bit elbowed out,” noted the LA Weekly. “We’ve seen perfectly pristine four-lane roads transformed into two-laners with thick strips of asphalt set aside just for the peddle-power set.” In addition to complaints from motorists, some have voiced more specific objections. “The only people who can use bike lanes are able-bodied and physically fit,” one reader wrote to the Los Angeles Daily News.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. vonborks
    vonborks 4 May, 2015, 12:00

    Several well used 2 lane each way roadways in San Pedro have been modified to 1 lane each way with a very wide bicycle lane. Traffic has slowed to well below the posted speed limit and turning into say a supermarket or mall, thru the bike lane is a problem. But few or no bicycles are using these bike superhighways. Adding teenyboppers’ on powered skate boards will be interesting.

    Reply this comment
  2. Dork
    Dork 4 May, 2015, 15:35

    This is great, they are planning on TAXING and REGISTERING ALL Bicycles on an Annual basis now right?? They are also going to Require Mandatory Annual Safety Inspections and of course we need all those bicycles Registered and Licensed. I think $100 TAX at purchase and an Annual Registration of $100, plus an additional $50 to purchase a Bicycle Operator License from the DMV every 2 years, MANDATORY INSURANCE also, they must have Liability Insurance for the squirrel they might kill, his family needs compensating. After All shouldn’t they be required to PAY for those lanes?? We CAR OWNERS Paid for ours.

    Reply this comment
  3. Stana2z
    Stana2z 5 May, 2015, 13:07

    How interesting that the cyclists want Cars to share the road, but they don’t want skateboards to share THEIR bike lanes. . “The California Bicycle Coalition says it wants to ensure bike lanes don’t get too crowded,” Boo Frickin’ Hoo

    Reply this comment
    • Queeg
      Queeg 7 May, 2015, 10:53

      Pay 500 bucks for license annually. Have proof of insurance. Pass driver test. Fine these rascals for going through stop signs and red lights. Excise tax of 20 percent on bike parts and tires. AND BIKE WEIRDO ATTIRE.

      That is the start…..

      Reply this comment
  4. Nick
    Nick 20 May, 2015, 18:44

    That’s the purpose of making more bike lanes. They want the public to get acclimated until they can’t live without it and then for license, registration, insurance, etc. I don’t know why people can’t see that’s coming. It’s the same game being played over and over.

    Reply this comment
  5. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 21 December, 2016, 20:01

    Get these ant fracking idiots to peddle their own electricity for them so they can watch their usial enviroemntal drivel

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Farmworker overtime passes easy test in Senate, faces challenge in Assembly

As expected, a bill expanding overtime pay for farmworkers passed the Senate on Monday along party lines. It moves to the

Middle class can’t afford CA

Politicians of both parties like to boast how they work for the “middle class.” Well, there isn’t much of a

Officials eye statewide marijuana regs

With marijuana legalization initiatives looming, Sacramento has turned its attention to standardizing regulations covering the popular decriminalized drug. Competing alternatives Legislators have