How will business lobby influence special session on transportation funds?

road repair, ca govGovernor Jerry Brown called special sessions to find permanent revenue sources to fund transportation infrastructure and Medi-Cal. The issue of keeping up with deteriorating roads has been a special concern to the business community and Brown is counting on business help to support a revenue solution for the roads. But is business willing to use its influence with Republican legislators to pass a transportation tax or fee increase of some kind?

Consensus in Sacramento is that the roads are in bad shape and revenue is needed to attack the problem. In announcing the special session, Brown noted that annual available excise fuel revenues for roads are billions short of the revenue needed. Deferred road maintenance requires billions more.

Democratic solutions are focused on tax and fee increases. Discussions have revolved around an increase in the gas tax, vehicle license fee, and per mileage fee, among other ideas. One approach on the tax and fee front is Sen. Jim Beall’s Senate Bill 16, which would raise $3.5 billion through a combination of taxes and fees.

Republicans have taken a different approach. Noting that the state budget increased a whopping $7.5 billion over last year, they ask why hasn’t more revenue been dedicated to the roads. Priorities dictate that transportation needs must be cared for so that the California economy can thrive, which in turn would bring in added revenue to the state.

Assembly Republicans issued a nine-point proposal this week that they say could direct $6 billion in existing state funds to transportation infrastructure. Senate Republicans similarly have introduced legislation into the special session to use current state funds for roads.

Republican opposition could thwart attempts to raise taxes for the roads because it takes a two-thirds vote to raise taxes. Republicans would be in no mood to raise taxes if GOP ideas are given short shrift.

That’s where the pressure from Republican allies in the business community might come into play.

Business interests in Sacramento have been calling for transportation improvements for a long time. They are concerned that political gridlock would lead to more delay. Business community leaders have expressed openness to tax increases or new funding sources for roads under certain conditions.

California Chamber of Commerce president Allan Zaremberg told the L.A. Times’ George Skelton, “If Republicans want to vote for taxes for transportation, I’m absolutely fine with it. I just want to make sure the money is spent on transportation.”

Jim Wunderman, who heads the Bay Area Council, stated, “We’re open to funding ideas on transportation.  Our region is at a standstill.  That said, we don’t have anything specific to work with, so I haven’t asked the members.  But some of the bigger employers are desperate for transportation fixes, given the state of things.”

Business might conceivably try to influence a wider tax discussion when it engages on road taxes. Support the administration in a road-funding scheme while demanding that the administration vocally oppose other tax plans aimed at business currently under discussion such as increased property taxes on commercial property and an oil severance tax.

Like those troublesome dinosaurs in Jurassic World, the tax discussion in the special session may go beyond the fences intended keep them in and focused on the roads.


Write a comment
  1. Charles Sainte Claire
    Charles Sainte Claire 1 July, 2015, 11:34

    Any additional taxes must go to the transportation find not the general fund.

    Reply this comment
    • ricky65
      ricky65 2 July, 2015, 09:16

      That’s not enough. Not one penny more until we get reform. Here’s a few suggestions:
      First return the $1 billion dollars in truck fees stolen from the Transportation fund by the D-Rats to prop up the general fund.
      Next stop stealing 20% of total gas taxes paid by motorists to shore up mass transit and bike paths who contribute nothing.
      Stop spending nearly a third of the contract prices of road construction projects on so called ‘environmental’ remediation. These include buying off local eco-extortion groups with non-project related funding ‘mitigation’ measures like so called as open space buyouts. Stop unnecessary requirements like extensive landscaping and irrigation of highways, orange fences,silt fences, straw wattles around everything and way overbuilt, expensive erosion control structures.(apparently God can make mud but man cannot.)
      Repeal the Davis-Bacon prevailing wage act and turn over design and construction of our state highways to private firms so we can get bang for our buck instead of the bloated, sclerotic,Caltrans bureaucracy.
      Get back to the business of building simple, safe and serviceable roads and give us some value for our gas taxes which are the highest in the country.

      Reply this comment
      • Ulysses Uhaul
        Ulysses Uhaul 3 July, 2015, 09:27

        No one reads laborious personal tomes on CWD. Accept leadership… will pay…accept it and move on.

        Reply this comment
  2. Queeg
    Queeg 1 July, 2015, 19:41

    Sounds like the little people pay dearly……how poor is poor?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Response To Steinberg Staffer’s Response

After a CalWatchdog story last week about Democrat Senate Pro Tem President Darrell Steinberg’s response to a constituent’s letter expressing

State Govt. Will Be Cut 20%

John Seiler: Steven Greenhut reports on last week’s budget deficit powwow of state budget bigshots, including Jerry Brown, legislative leaders

San Jose police union stalls officer cameras, cites ‘privacy’

Basic concepts of police professionalism were more or less born in Northern California, courtesy of a reform-minded police chief, as