CA secures federal extension on ID compliance

Real ID

Photo Credit: gizmodo.com

Amid fears of travel debacles and administrative nightmares, the federal government gave California a last-minute extension to become compliant with new nationwide ID requirements.

At the mercy of the Department of Homeland Security, California had joined a number of states in dragging its feet on the new rules, meant to make drivers licenses more uniform and secure. “The latest actions by the department granted compliance extensions to California, Alaska, South Carolina and New Jersey until Oct. 10, 2016,” according to Quartz. “With these extensions, 22 states are now exempt until that date from the security requirements, known as Real ID. New Mexico and Washington state have exemptions that last through Jan. 10, and have yet to be granted extensions.”

The grab bag of states reluctant to comply with the regulations revealed two sets of political quirks. Firstly, although DHS actually lacks the legal power to enforce compliance, it has relied on a variety of regulatory carrots and sticks to sway most states. “In October, it began requiring that visitors to military bases, nuclear plants and federal facilities produce a driver’s license from a state that complies with the law, or show another form of government ID, like a passport,” the New York Times reported. “But the biggest leverage the government has over the states is commercial air travel.”

“The Department of Homeland Security said it would provide a schedule by the end of this year for when airport screeners would start accepting only driver’s licenses that complied with federal standards. It said that 120 days’ notice would be given before starting to enforce the law at airports.”

Nationwide pushback

That move confirmed the fears of personal privacy and civil liberty advocates, who have long warned of a federal drive toward an effectual national ID card. Others have focused in on the broader inefficiencies of the Transportation Security Administration, which has endured a string of high-profile scandals and failures in recent years. “We already know that Real ID noncompliance has no effect on airport security, just as we know that TSA body scanners and screening procedures don’t work. Last year, screeners had a 95 percent failure rate when Homeland Security agents tried to sneak weapons and fake explosives through TSA checkpoints at airports around the country,” wrote the editorial board of the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

And some activists and analysts also criticized the sheer cost of compliance. “There is no need for California to spend a dime on Real ID compliance, but the most recent analysis of AB1465 says the California DMV would incur costs of approximately $5.56 million in 2016-17 and $5.4 million each year after that,” argued Cato Institute senior fellow Jim Harper.

But, in California, the changes have impacted a different constituency as well: advocates for mainstreaming unlawful immigrants into civic life. Liberals statewide — and around the country — largely cheered when the Golden State succeeded in its negotiations last year with federal authorities around granting special drivers licenses to the otherwise undocumented. Although officials have said “the new rules are not related to California’s decision to provide drivers’ licenses to immigrants,” according to KCRA, because “[t]hose licenses were never intended to be used for air travel and are marked accordingly,” Washington’s aggressive negotiating stance — it rejected initial California designs for the special license — implied a federal interest in minimizing differences between licenses in different states.

Time running out

Adding to the atmosphere of concern, some states have already had their requests for compliance extensions rejected. “At least 19 other states recently received an extension of their exemptions, but the federal agency rejected requests for extensions from Missouri and Illinois,” KCRA reported separately. “States initially were supposed to comply with the Real ID requirements by the end of 2009. Federal authorities have repeatedly delayed implementation to provide time for states to change their driver’s license procedures and make the necessary technological improvements.” But patience has begun to run out.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 8 January, 2016, 11:02

    As much as I detest our unregulated and out of control national immigration policy Real ID is a dystopian and fascistic step toward a national ID card. Anyone who values their freedom to travel, their privacy or their right to work should oppose this. I hope enough states will resist this unwarranted attack on state sovereignty to kill the entire process.

    Real ID will not make us safe from terrorists nor will it prevent employers from using illegal alien labor. What it will end up doing is give the tyrannical Federal government too much control over the ability of citizens and legal residents to obtain private employment by mutual consent. It will also be used inevitably to control our travel and track our whereabouts. It’s just another noxious police state policy imposed on us by the loathsome George W. Bush regime. I wonder how many illegal’s that imbecile has working on his ranch?

    Reply this comment
  2. tmaddison
    tmaddison 8 January, 2016, 13:25

    Why does this article give no clue as to what these “onerous” requirements are?

    What changes could possibly be made to the design of an ID card that would cost $5M/year?

    It’s just an ID card, come on….

    Reply this comment
    • Rex the Wonder Dog!
      Rex the Wonder Dog! 8 January, 2016, 19:47

      What changes could possibly be made to the design of an ID card that would cost $5M/year?

      LOL…this is the gov we’re talking about here, the place where toilet seats cost $600 and hammers are $400.

      Reply this comment
  3. Losbanos1
    Losbanos1 8 January, 2016, 22:01

    The people of America must unite and tell the federal government NO, we must stand together under the 10 amendment. We must tell the feds to go home to their 10 mile square home. They have authority here . NO , we will no comply.

    Reply this comment
  4. Losbanos1
    Losbanos1 8 January, 2016, 22:03

    The people of America must unite and tell the federal government NO, we must stand together under the 10 amendment. We must tell the feds to go home to their 10 mile square home. They have NO authority here . NO , we will no comply.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment


Tags assigned to this article:
DHSdrivers' licensesTSAReal IDair travel

Related Articles

Do high taxes cost state jobs?

AUGUST 30, 2010 By JOHN SEILER It’s become a commonplace among many Republicans, conservatives and libertarians that California’s high-tax climate

CA Budget Still Needs Fumigation

Feb. 22, 2011 By JOHN SEILER As Gov. Jerry Brown and the state Legislature continue crafting a budget, skunks keep

Is Public Transit Bankrupt?

March 31, 2010 By KATY GRIMES With the announcement this week by Sacramento Regional Transit that it is reducing bus and train