Rams moving to L.A.; Chargers likely to follow

Inglewood stadium NFLThe drama over which of three cities would lose their NFL teams to Los Angeles ended decisively Tuesday night. On a 30-2 vote, NFL owners gave the go-ahead to having the St. Louis Rams move to L.A. next season in preparation for the 2019 opening of a stadium in Inglewood that Rams owner Stan Kroenke began prepping to build a year ago.

The Chargers were given a one-year option to move — an option that seemed far more like an unserious public-relations ploy to suggest that they hadn’t made their minds up than a sign they actually might not leave. Team owner Dean Spanos and his stadium point man, Mark Fabiani, have an awful relationship with the San Diego establishment, starting with Mayor Kevin Faulconer. If the Chargers choose not to leave San Diego, the Oakland Raiders would then have a one-year option to move.

This followed a wild day at the NFL owners’ meeting in Houston. The NFL relocation committee initially voted 5-1 to support the Chargers’ and the Raiders’ plan to build a stadium in Carson, move their teams and lay claim to the Los Angeles market. That was followed by subsequent votes of all 32 owners in which 20 backed requiring the Chargers to abandon their partnership with the Raiders and share a stadium in Inglewood with the St. Louis Rams, and 12 backed the Carson plan.

As the day wore on, support emerged for a third option: clearing the Rams to move to Inglewood and build a stadium there, while allowing the Chargers to join the Rams in a year or two after reviving talks with San Diego officials on how to fund and build a billion-dollar-plus NFL stadium. That morphed into the decision to give the Chargers an option to stay in San Diego with a one-year window to join the Rams in Inglewood.

Here’s more from the Los Angeles Times:

Until the stadium is complete, the Rams are expected to play temporarily at the L.A. Memorial Coliseum. If the Chargers join them, it’s unclear where they will play, though the NFL sees Angel Stadium, Dodger Stadium and even the Rose Bowl, which declined last year to bid on hosting a team, as potential options. …

 

The maneuvering between the projects included Disney Chairman and Chief Executive Robert Iger joining the Carson project pending its approval. In the weeks leading up to the vote, he vigorously lobbied for Carson, making phone calls to NFL owners, as did Carolina Panthers owner Jerry Richardson, who orchestrated Iger’s involvement. Iger presented Carson’s plan to owners Tuesday, along with Davis and Spanos.

Chargers assured they’ll share in Inglewood bonanza

According to many reports, the key to the NFL owners’ landslide vote was assuring the Chargers that they wouldn’t be in a completely subordinate position in sharing the Inglewood facilities with the Rams. Moving to Los Angeles would be much less of a bonanza for the Spanos family if it had to pay heavy rent and was shut out of many of the ancillary ways that stadiums and big mixed-use development projects make money. The Times put it this way:

In the last several days, fellow owners worked behind the scenes to bring Kroenke and Spanos together in an accord that allows them to be equitable partners in the Inglewood stadium. The only shared stadium in the NFL is in East Rutherford, N.J., which is home to the New York Giants and Jets.

So what’s next for the Raiders?

In an odd interview Tuesday night, owner Mark Davis suggested he might take his team to Great Britain or some other locale far from the western division of the American Football Conference; his team’s lease is up at what used to be known as the Oakland Coliseum.

But coverage in the Bay Area has focused on the likelihood of the NFL pressuring the Raiders to play in Santa Clara at the 49ers’ gleaming 2-year-old Levi’s Stadium — with the sort of subservient relationship to the 49ers that the Chargers hope to avoid in Inglewood.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. ricky65
    ricky65 13 January, 2016, 09:42

    Speaking as a Nor-Cal resident it will be nice to have the Rams back in LA where they can be properly despised by us Nortes.
    Speaking of despised, Mark Davis of the Raiders is a completely clueless hack who apparently inherited only his dad’s family trait for greed and duplicity.
    Long suffering loyal Raider fans deserve to keep their team in the east bay and not be subject to the whims of the Al Davis crime family’s continual cash grabs.
    But then greedy pretty much describes all the NFL team owners it seems.

    Reply this comment
    • Rex the Wonder Dog!
      Rex the Wonder Dog! 13 January, 2016, 10:07

      Remember when the Raiders were the KINGS of Monday Night Football, were the WINNINGEST team in all of pro sports and had NEVER had a losing season???? I do!

      The entire Bay Area preferred the Raiders over the 49er’s 4 to 1 back then. Now it is the OPPOSITE!

      Reply this comment
    • Mike in Sac
      Mike in Sac 13 January, 2016, 19:28

      Years ago here in Sacramento we almost had the Raiders move here. Then it fell through and they moved back to Oakland from LA. We just were denied a MLS soccer team but a nice new soccer stadium is being built downtown. Why not move the Raiders inland to Sac. We havemega fans of the Raider nation here.

      Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 13 January, 2016, 10:15

    According to many reports, the key to the NFL owners’ landslide vote was assuring the Chargers that they wouldn’t be in a completely subordinate position in sharing the Inglewood facilities with the Rams. Moving to Los Angeles would be much less of a bonanza for the Spanos family if it had to pay heavy rent and was shut out of many of the ancillary ways that stadiums and big mixed-use development projects make money.
    See the big scam in these stadium “deals” is when the taxpayers cover 50%, 75% or 100% and then the Bazillionaire owners reap windfall profits from “naming rights” (hundreds of millions), luxury boxes, parking, and concessions. It is a major scam. The owners put in nothing, or close to nothing, and come out with hundreds of millions lining their pockets PLUS the stadium.

    If the Spans Crime Family want a new stadium they can BUILD IT THEMSELVES… 😉

    Reply this comment
  3. Billius Goreus
    Billius Goreus 13 January, 2016, 15:38

    As a former san diegan I am desperately seeking closure on the whole Chargers issue. The city and county of san diego should offer to pay their moving expenses….UHaul-you out there? WAVE GOODBYE, tear down that hideous stadium and restore eastern Mission Valley to bucolic farmland. THEN get rid of Sea World…..

    Reply this comment
    • Ulysses Uhaul
      Ulysses Uhaul 18 January, 2016, 03:08

      Uly is more than happy for moving San Diego’s problems down the road.

      We have new special. 20% off on Mongolian Yak moving blankets!

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Shake, rattle and roll in Nor Cal

May 23, 2013 By Katy Grimes Earthquake! Tonight in Sacramento, we felt the rumblings of a 5.7 earthquake centered in

Brazil anti-govt. protests spreading

June 22, 2013 By John Seiler I noted earlier that anti-government protests have erupted in Brazil against their crummy government.

CA take note: Detroit bankruptcy could slash pensions 90%

July 18, 2013 By John Seiler Detroit declared bankruptcy today. For California, here are the takeaways from the Detroit News