Trump to scrap vehicle mileage standards – fight with California, environmentalists likely

President Trump on Wednesday launched the first salvo in what seems likely to end up a war with the state of California and many liberal states over vehicle mileage rules that Gov. Jerry Brown and environmentalists depict as crucial to control pollution and to reduce the emission of gases believed to contribute to global warming.

At a ceremony at a Detroit-area auto facility after meeting with auto executives, Trump declared his intention to pursue “fair” regulations that “protect and defend” jobs.

Before his remarks, Trump staffers gave background briefings to reporters on his plans to scrap mileage rules approved by President Obama’s EPA in his final weeks on the job. The new rules would require cars and small trucks to average 54.5 miles per gallon in 2025, up from the present 36 miles per gallon.

Automakers were unhappy with the Obama administration’s speedy decision-making – new rules weren’t required until 2018. They believe the rules will require them to sell vehicles Americans don’t want to buy in an era in which gasoline prices are low and relatively stable because of a heavy increase in domestic oil production. Warning that the new rules would put more than 1 million jobs at risk, automakers have been lobbying Trump since they were enacted.

Brown administration officials have already filed a challenge to Trump’s directive, according to the Los Angeles Times. “Any weakening or delay of the national standards will result in increased harms to our natural resources, our economy, and our people,” the brief asserted.

13 states use California’s tougher standards

But while the president rattled state officials with his actions, he didn’t go as far as some environmentalists feared.

Under the federal Clean Air Act of 1970, California was given the right to waive federal vehicle mileage rules in favor of stricter standards because of the state’s severe problems with smog and ozone pollution in Southern California. The waiver allows other states to follow California’s tougher standards. Thirteen do, and as a result about 40 percent of the nation’s residents who buy about 40 percent of vehicles do so under California’s stricter rules, irking automakers who don’t like to have to deal with what are essentially two national standards.

The Trump administration could have tried to end California’s waiver entirely or prevent other states from using the Golden State’s rules. Instead, Reuters reported the administration hopes to work with the state on a compromise.

But that is close to certain to be a nonstarter, given Brown’s and the California Legislature’s approval of a law requiring the state to have greenhouse-gas emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Achieving that goal appears close to impossible without sharply cutting emissions from the state’s transportation sector, which generates 36 percent of California’s carbon emissions, according to the most recent statistics.

Vehicle emissions rule a potent weapon for state regulators

Stanford environmental law professor Michael Wara said tough vehicle mileage standards have been the state’s strongest tool in combating greenhouse gas emissions.

“California is going to fight, to deploy every resource it has, to keep this stuff, because this is big,” Wara told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Wednesday’s developments were foreshadowed by the January confirmation hearing of Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt, like Trump a climate change skeptic and longtime EPA critic. Under questioning by Sen. Kamala Harris, D-San Francisco, Pruitt refused to say whether the Trump administration supported allowing California to continue to waive federal air pollution rules in favor of tougher standards.

Given that California’s waiver is written into federal law, it is unclear whether the Trump administration could force the state to follow federal rules. In 2008, George W. Bush’s administration challenged new state rules, prompting a lawsuit from then-Attorney General Jerry Brown that was joined by 15 other states. But no court decision was forthcoming before Barack Obama succeeded Bush the following year. The Obama administration quickly dropped the challenge.

9 comments

Write a comment
  1. Bubba
    Bubba 16 March, 2017, 14:01

    May common sense again prevail in our country!

    Reply this comment
  2. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 16 March, 2017, 14:18

    And with Next Month being Earthday(April 22nd)you can bet these eco-wackos will be out in force lead by such pinheads like Robert Redford,Leonardo DiCaprio,Luarie David,Al Gore and Robert Kennedy Jr as well as the wackos dressed as polarbears

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 17 March, 2017, 08:43

    Comrades

    Cancel Earth Day and all be well!

    Reply this comment
  4. Mr. Pickle
    Mr. Pickle 17 March, 2017, 11:32

    The state cannot seem to understand that their is an economic impact on consumers with all the CA ONLY regs, and costs continue to escalate for the consumer……….. the LIB LEFT wants us to pay for urban transportation systems that yield minimal participation. As the goal is ZERO emissions, they never cite the FACTS of how much cleaner the air is today compared to yesterday. When is enough, enough? NEVER, as this keeps more government employees on the job stating we are saving lives…… Yeah, right….. See SB-1 Beall for a shocker, let alone gas tax increases and Gov proposed $65 DMV increase for everybody. All of this from an idiot wishing for a Sanctuary State.
    GOD HELP US!

    Reply this comment
    • Harry Sachs
      Harry Sachs 18 March, 2017, 11:15

      They want Californians riding horses.

      Reply this comment
      • Bubba
        Bubba 19 March, 2017, 15:23

        No we can’t do the gas from their rears would have to regulated by the nanny state just like Moonbeam wants to regulate gas from cows!

        Reply this comment
        • jay
          jay 20 March, 2017, 12:17

          “………. they never cite the FACTS of how much cleaner the air is today compared to yesterday…..”

          Excellent point. I wind up arguing that very concept with progressive lunatics all the time. The problem is they have never taken an economics class, and therefore do not comprehend the concept of DIMINISHING MARGINAL RETURNS. “Zero-emissions” is theoretically possible, I suppose, but an impossibility in practice.

          Reply this comment
  5. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 20 March, 2017, 23:03

    The eco-wackos wont be happy until were all living in caves and sacrificing virgins to the sun or moon god theres already some crack-pot who says we should elemnate cars,steel and coal I have abetter idea we need to elinate enviromentalists lets send them all up north as polarbearchow and left over bits for the skuas and killer whales

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

New 49ers stadium intercepts tax dollars

The National Football League remains as agile as ever at intercepting the taxpayers’ money. The latest example is the new stadium

Greenhouse gas research nets Google jet fuel deal

California-based Google is a company famously flush with cash. Last year, the internet giant earned $50 billion in annual revenue

Schwarzenegger Was The Acting Governor

JAN. 24. 2011 This article was first published in City Journal. By STEVEN GREENHUT As Arnold Schwarzenegger stepped down as