Environmental Bureaucrats continue driving diesel trucks off the road

Oct. 16, 2012

By Warren Duffy

Whether traveling interstates or two lane back roads of our nation, on any given day one can find diesel trucks traveling to stores, warehouses, etc. They are loading and unloading of pallets of food, clothing, plants, auto products, sporting gear and myriad other merchandise for consumer consumption.

Yet, the environmental bureaucrats in both the state of California and the federal government appear bent on proving that truckers operating diesel trucks are villains who must be taken off the streets across America.

It all began in California when “Dr.” Hien Tran, employed by the California Air Resources Board, issued a 2008 report claiming diesel fumes released “particulate matter,” killing 3,500 Californians who had inhaled the tainted air the year prior to his report.

CARB pushed this research, constructing a sheaf of new environmental laws that are choking the state’s diesel truckers, as well as other diesel-powered machinery owners with upgrades mandated in the millions of dollars.

One problem. “Dr.” Tran’s doctorate degree turned out to be a phony, thus putting his statistical reporting as more than questionable. Yet CARB continues to back Tran’s findings and keep him on staff as a pollution specialist. Though having removed his title of “doctor,” Tran’s reported earnings in 2011 were $87,492.52.

EPA meddling

Enter the U.S. EPA.  Lisa Jackson, administrator of the federal bureaucracy, appeared before Congress in 2011 testifying, “Particulate matter causes premature death. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should.” To what extent was the EPA willing to go to prove such statements?

If one heard of human beings paid $12 per hour to breathe concentrated diesel truck exhaust fumes for hours at a time, it would seem absurd.  Isn’t this America, where such things would never be brought before the citizens of our country. But think again.

The experiment referenced above did take place as a research project sponsored by the EPA on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  “That EPA administrator Lisa Jackson permitted this heinous experimentation to occur under her watch shocks the conscience,” said Steven Milloy, lawyer and Johns Hopkins-trained biostatistician.

Milloy filed a lawsuit against the EPA in a US District court in Virginia and a complaint against the three scientists with the North Carolina Medical Board. The suit claims that, under the Freedom of Information Act, evidence was collected that showed the EPA paid 41 human guinea pigs to breathe exhaust fumes that were more than 21 times greater than the levels the EPA claims are “permissible.”

When it comes to diesel trucks, environmental bureaucratic boards have a proclivity to “shoot first and aim later.”  Whether it is the EPA using human beings to breathe diesel truck exhaust fumes through a tube or CARB issuing mandatory regulations gained from statistical data of an employee falsifying his qualifications, the end result is always the same.

As the socialist experiment of picking winners and losers continues in this environmental chess game, they will sink to nothing to get this commerce — already subject to so much unreasonable and unnecessary regulations and expense — off the highways and out of work.  While the attacks continue, consumers will experience these costs incurred by the trucking industry passed along through increased prices for food, clothing, gas, construction, etc.

Who really is the villain?


Write a comment
  1. us citizen
    us citizen 16 October, 2012, 08:36

    Its time to nuke Sacramento

    Reply this comment
  2. Ted Steele, The Decider
    Ted Steele, The Decider 16 October, 2012, 08:40

    I agree with T Boone Pickens—- convert all US semis to nat gas— It would erase our dependence on mid east oil and create an in country industrial revolution!!!!!!!!!

    Reply this comment
  3. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 16 October, 2012, 09:03

    Teddy – I am with you and Boone on nat gas.

    Not so sure how much a revolution it will create tho…..It sounds to me like a page from the Broken Window School of Economics.

    More nat has drilling and downstream jobs, for sure. But new nat gas motors don’t come cheap, plus there’s the infrastructure to be installed. Call it a wash.

    But even if it does nothing that keep the screaming hordes of envirocrats off our necks for a while, it will be worth it.

    Until, that is, they find something else to scream about. And they will. Only when the last Evil White Man departs these fruited plains will they be truly happy.

    Reply this comment
  4. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 16 October, 2012, 10:26

    Teddy makes his FIRST intelligent comment. Hell MUST have frozen over 😉

    Reply this comment
  5. Hondo
    Hondo 16 October, 2012, 11:45

    I think Jimmydeeoc is on to something. The problem is not the diesel trucks, its us white folk. We white folk who don’t hate ourselves for something our greatgrandfathers did is the real truth. These enviro wackos are at heart, Ward Churchill and Elizabeth Warren wannabes. They are Kemosabe wannabe’s. They look at their pasty skin and cringe. They dream of Aztlan.
    I dream of those ice scream bars I love so much that only get to my local stores because of big trucks. But the same goes for all those organic foods the enviro nuts crave.

    Reply this comment
  6. Mitch Rapp
    Mitch Rapp 16 October, 2012, 14:30

    WE need to FIRE people adn FIRE THEM FAST

    Reply this comment
  7. Queeg
    Queeg 16 October, 2012, 17:42

    Teddy is the backbone of the posting community…he is pragmatic not a fanatical bunker loon!

    Pick your friends wisely!

    Reply this comment
  8. Ted Steele, The Decider
    Ted Steele, The Decider 16 October, 2012, 21:14

    Jimmy— The broken window school worked good for Rudy— it could help with the engines and a nice trickle down!

    Reply this comment
  9. Diesel Rocks
    Diesel Rocks 17 October, 2012, 08:26

    Boone Pickens is a shill for natural gas because he controls a large percentage of supply. Of course he wants to convert.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Related Articles

Goal of online tobacco sales ban: more state tax revenue

California may be considered a technology pioneer, but at least one state lawmaker wants to put the brakes on a

Big Brother CARB Is Watching You

FEB. 3, 2012 By JOHN SEILER I love cars. The best auto site in the Internet is EricPetersAutos.com. He writes

After industry compromise, lawmaker pursues more ride-sharing regulations

Just four months after a new state law on ride-sharing took effect, California lawmakers are once again considering more regulations on