Budget ‘transparency’ murky in Senate

June 14, 2013

By Katy Grimes

CA spending transparency, Cagle, March 31, 2013

SACRAMENTO — I watched in dismay as Senate Democrats voted yesterday to bypass proper procedure in order to play politics with the budget. They withdrew several of their budget bills from the Rules Committee, to send them directly to the Senate Floor.

This is a big breach of protocol, but is becoming commonplace in both houses of the Legislature.

“This is $230 billion dollars’ worth of partisan budget legislation produced behind closed doors by essentially three people,” Sen. Minority Leader Bob Huff said. “There hasn’t been a single public hearing on the actual bills that will have actual impacts on very real people.”

Huff said bypassing the rules would deny the public the opportunity to review and comment on the impact of the budget legislation during open and public budget hearings.

Under the Joint Rules, all bills with any fiscal impact are required to be heard in the Budget Committee or Appropriations committee before they can be sent to the Senate floor.

But it was 23-9 party line vote. Someone wasn’t listening.

The Capitol swamp water is getting even murkier

Huff told Senate colleagues millions of Californians deserve the opportunity to read the budget bills and contact their elected representatives prior to the vote.

And, Senators need to be able to read the bills before voting on them.

“Even during the Budget Conference Committee hearing last Monday night when so much of what was voted on was simply approving what was already agreed to behind closed doors, the actual budget language did not exist,” Huff said.

“The final version (of the budget) was constructed with no public input,” added Sen. Bill Emmerson, R-Redlands. Emmerson is Vice Chairman of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee. “This is not the best way to do the people’s business.”

Emmerson noted that the budget has changed significantly since it was first introduced in January. “The people deserve the opportunity to provide their testimony on how the budget will impact their lives and communities.”

Huff added: “I’m confident that California voters did not intend government openness and transparency to suffer when they gave the Legislature simple-majority budget powers, but there’s no question that’s the case now.”


Write a comment
  1. ECK
    ECK 13 June, 2013, 21:00

    Well, it’s obvious to me, and has been, that the CA legislature has become, simply stated, a criminal enterprise. Hide everything! You plebes be damned! We know what’s best for you. Trust us. “We’ll pass it to find out what’s in it”. The most moronic statement by a US Senator in my lifetime. (and stunningly, she’s still there!) Apparently we’re a state of idiot voters. Almost enough to give it up entirely.

    Reply this comment
  2. Tkg2902
    Tkg2902 13 June, 2013, 22:28

    Its always been a cesspool.

    Reply this comment
  3. Tax Target
    Tax Target 13 June, 2013, 23:22

    If it’s Brown flush it down! This sewer of a government needs to go… to go!

    Reply this comment
  4. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 15 June, 2013, 08:25

    What pleasant posters! The usual sick minds dominate…..your being watched…that’s encouraging….if you snap, you will be gobbled up pronto….thank goodness!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CA editorial boards cool to anti-Uber power play

The editorial pages of the state’s largest newspapers largely agree about Tom Torlakson’s being undeserving of a second term as

What are Republicans for? Dept.

April 17, 2013 By John Seiler You might have heard the term, “Me too Republicans.” It’s similar to the more

FPPC on ‘dark money’ witch hunt

Just in time for Halloween, the Fair Political Practices Commission completed a modern-day witch-hunt last week, looking for “dark money.”