‘Anti-science policies’ seen as factor in CA water crisis

el.dorado.county.riverbedGov. Jerry Brown’s recent executive order mandating decreased water use prompted national and international attention. All coverage understandably emphasized the state’s 4-year-old drought; some linked the problem to climate change.

But a California-based journalist who specializes in science reporting based on hard evidence — Hank Campbell, author of “Science Left Behind” and founder of the popular Science 2.0 website — takes a broader view based on the last 50 years of state governance.

In an essay titled “California Government Is The Big Water Management Problem,” featured on the Real Clear Science site, Campbell notes that ….

… much of the fresh water that California has runs into the Pacific Ocean. You might wonder why the Pacific Ocean needs so much, since 96 percent of Earth’s water is already in oceans, but the oceans are not asking for it. Instead, it is due to anti-science policies lobbied for by well-heeled California environmentalists.

Environmental regulations mandate that water that would sustain 4.4 million families gets flushed this way, regardless of drought conditions (however, farmers do get penalized during a drought, the environment must come before food). Meanwhile, Governor Jerry Brown just now got around to mandating water conservation among his wealthiest and most loyal voters. It had to be mandated because the wealthy are not conserving anything the way the more agricultural sections of California have been doing for two years. …

[If] we cared about the actual problem — having enough water in good times and bad — the situation would be easy to resolve. For example, enough water to sustain 2.6 million California families was dumped into the ocean because there isn’t enough storage capacity in the north of the state and environmental rules limit the amount of water that can be pumped to reservoirs in the south.

An intentional effort to not prepare for drought

Campbell notes that this isn’t just a failure of government foresight. He says this inaction was the goal of powerful interests.

Why not allow more water to be stored in the south or build more reservoirs in the north instead of dumping fresh water into the ocean? Californians know water is important, we have agreed to water bonds totaling $22 billion in recent years, but the money has ended up going to environmental projects rather than things that help the people paying interest on those bonds.

Most of California is actually desert, the green parts are all watered to be that way, and we know droughts will happen — this is the fourth one in 50 years — so it would make sense to store more water, a literal anti-rainy day plan. But environmentalists block all efforts to create more reservoirs even though we know this sort of thing has always happened and will continue to happen. ….

Because of environmental impact lawsuits and lobbying by environmental groups, there hasn’t been a real investment in water infrastructure since the 1960s, when there were only 16 million people in California. Now there are 40 million people all using the same major infrastructure. …

The common denominators in our water problem are a lack of snow and lawsuit-driven, rather than science-driven, environmentalism. We can only fix one of those.

Greens bitterly fight desalination plants

California environmentalists have also been the biggest opponents of a soon-to-open desalination plant in Carlsbad and one proposed for Huntington Beach. They say it is because of legitimate concerns about effects on fish, ocean water quality and the coastline.

Defenders of desalination efforts, such as former state Sen. Mark Wyland, R-Carlsbad, say that many greens’ real long-term goal is blocking growth or making it more difficult. Constricting water supplies could be seen as a tactic toward that end.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Tesla_x
    Tesla_x 16 April, 2015, 08:11

    DO THE MATH: 4.4mill acre ft/yr=1.4 trillion gal/yr wasted by DEMOCRAT ECO-RADICALS
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/californias-farm-water-scapegoat-1428706579

    The SMELT-SCAM’S Cost to California’s economy? ~$2 Billion a year?
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/drought-will-cost-california-2-2-billion-in-losses-costs-this-year-1405452120

    Then add skyrocketing food prices.

    This SMELTSCAM has been going on for years.

    TRILLIONS of gallons SQUANDERED over unscientific ECO-Democrat schemes to control the state’s water supplies…by hook or by crook.

    Reply this comment
  2. Wayne Lusvardi
    Wayne Lusvardi 16 April, 2015, 11:51

    The Delta can work scientifically fine either flushing water to the ocean or sending water through the Delta to farms and cities. So it is not “anti-acience” policies that are the problem but political and cultural values. California values flushing water to the ocean over sending it southward. The problem is inflexibility. Flushing water to the ocean works in wet years and when there is a surplus of water to do so. But it is ruinous to flush water to the ocean in a drought. What is needed is more flexibility.

    Reply this comment
    • Tesla_x
      Tesla_x 18 April, 2015, 07:20

      It is an anti science, anti natural cycle experiment gone horribly wrong.

      Trying to restart rivers and save fish populations being prodominantly affected by decades long natural cycles is simply reckless use of a scarce resource.

      Mother Nature is killing the smelt, not man.

      The PDO affects both coastal and inland fish populations, and probably global temperature variations too. Read more here.

      http://jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/climatechange00/IdeaArticles/TheEffectsofPDOonSalmonPo.html

      FYI

      ECO-Diversions using 1.4 trillion gallons per year is the equivalent of roughly 100 gallons used per day, every day, for every man, woman, and child in California, all~38M of us.

      Nice of the environmentalists to send all that water out into the Pacific Ocean for us to ‘save the environment’

      Reply this comment
  3. Ted Steele PhD
    Ted Steele PhD 21 April, 2015, 14:12

    Tea baggers HATE science— it’s ok! Jesus Reagan will save us!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Cal Tax Increase Election w/o GOP?

John Seiler: EDITOR’S NOTE: In response to some of our readers, we want to remind you that this is a

Spain’s High-Speed Boondoggle

John Seiler: Spain also has wasted money on a high-speed rail boondoggle, one they actually built. The Bee ran an

Video: FlashReport.org’s Jon Fleischman interviews Gov. Rick Perry

Feb. 14, 2013 By John Seiler Texas Gov. Rick Perry, in socialist California to bring jobs back to free-market Texas,