Proposed rules for self-driving cars draw heavy criticism from industry leaders

driverless-autonomous-carsHopes that California would emerge as the global center for what eventually could be a multitrillion-dollar industry — self-driving vehicles — have taken a step back.

New proposed rules unveiled this month by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles drew sharp complaints from the leading companies in the field — Google, General Motors, Ford, Volkswagen and Honda — as being far too onerous and certain to slow innovation. They are among 18 firms with licenses to test autonomous vehicles in California.

A nascent industry group — The Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets, whose members include Lyft, Uber Technologies and Volvo — released a statement that the rules “could greatly delay the benefits that self-driving vehicles can bring to safety and mobility for individuals.”

Among the proposed state rules spurring concern:

  • A regulation that would require a one-year delay between testing a vehicle with new technology and its use on public streets and highways.

  • A regulation that would require driverless vehicles being tested to have vehicle data recorders whose information is regularly provided to the DMV, which automakers fear could lead to proprietary information leaking out.

  • A regulation that allows police to demand that information from the vehicle data recorders be turned over within 24 hours without authorities having to get a subpoena or warrant.

  • A requirement that all local governments give their permission before an autonomous vehicle could be used on their roads and highways.

The last requirement drew a sharp response from Ron Medford, the director of safety for Google’s self-driving car project, who wondered why bureaucrats didn’t grasp how much red tape this would create. Medford said the rule was “unworkable,” according to a Reuters report.

Perhaps the only state action that was greeted warmly was regulatory language that suggested the DMV would be willing to accept testing of vehicles without steering wheels more quickly than expected.

Sharp contrast between state, federal approach

The state’s framework is based in many ways on ideas outlined in a federal proposal unveiled in September. That proposal generally won praise from autonomous automakers and from such tech websites as Ars Technica for heeding industry recommendations — especially in how to categorize levels of autonomy in vehicles being developed. Instead of using outdated language crafted by federal officials, the U.S. Department of Transportation adopted what are known as the SAE standards, which classify vehicles from 0 (totally human controlled) to 5 (totally automated).

But the reason the federal proposal won cheers while the California DMV’s plan won jeers is that the federal proposal amounts to a collection of guidelines, not hard rules. The Obama administration also underlined how important it considered autonomous vehicles to be in our future economy by having Jeffrey Zients, director of the National Economic Council, join Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx at the news conference unveiling the rules. This was reflected in the headline on The New York Times coverage of the event: “Self-Driving Cars Gain Powerful Ally: The Government.”

The California state government sought to offer reassurance that its rules were drafts open to revision and that it wanted and welcomed input from the 18 companies testing autonomous vehicles in the state.

But the assurance didn’t come from Gov. Jerry Brown or one of his top aides. It came from Brian Soublet, deputy director of the California DMV, who said, “The goal is making sure that we can get this life-saving technology out on the streets.’

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Standing Fast
    Standing Fast 28 October, 2016, 12:42

    First, there is no man-made device that is superior to the innately marvelous but flawed human being. Man does not have the ability to make something that is superior to the combined powers of our intelligence apparatus and physical abilities of our species.
    Second, a self-driving vehicle is no exception.
    Third, the fact that the government had to come up with some kind of rules or laws to mitigate the undesirable side-effects of self-driving vehicles shows that ordinary people have more sense than the experts.
    Fourth, while I can see some benefit for a self-driving vehicle for elderly or disabled people as long as they stay off the freeways, I do not see them being safe inside these vehicles. There are too many things that can go wrong, and will given enough time.
    Fifth, the assumption by too many people that self-driving vehicles are inherently superior to human-operated vehicles is based on the false notion that science and technology are the salvation of mankind. In fact, most of the innovations of the past two hundred years have been disastrous to the well-being of every living thing and the terra firma upon which we live.
    Sixth, I am not an advocate of Climate Change Policies because even if they were based on sound reasoning, they do not address actual problems that can be resolved by human beings. I am a Liberty-loving Conservation-minded American.
    Seventh, the government should get out of the business of funding research and development of any technology, industry, and so forth. Let the market work out what works and what doesn’t. Until that day comes, I’m not interested in being driven anywhere by an inanimate object.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Happy 25th anniversary, World Wide Web

The Internet was invented in California in 1969 as a government project. But the critical technology, the World Wide Web,

Arnold vs the state constitution

Evelyn B Stacey: In his most recent weekly radio address, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced proposals to eliminate the office of

Exit of UC president’s aides brings university scandal back into spotlight

Is University of California President Janet Napolitano attempting to scapegoat two of her top aides for a scandal that enraged