CA water policy: Will House GOP demand more change?

The California water compromise reached by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-San Francisco, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, and inserted into the massive infrastructure bill that was signed into law last week was trumpeted as a hard-fought victory for Central Valley agriculture.

But the larger war over how California’s limited water resources are used seems far from over. The compromise’s approval is sure to spur new court battles. It could also embolden House Republicans like McCarthy and Devin Nunes, R-Tulare, and conservative think tanks to seek further changes in federal policies.

Environmental groups are expected to sue over new rules which allow federal authorities in charge of water supplies in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to deliver more water to farmers in periods of drought.

The Endangered Species Act has been a potent weapon for environmental groups, which have often succeeded in getting judges to adopt broad interpretations of provisions that have been used to protect the delta smelt and Chinook salmon in Northern California waterways. This thinking is reflected in a lawsuit filed in March by green groups, which say even the strong environmental stances of federal and state regulators under Democratic President Barack Obama and Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown don’t go far enough in providing fresh water to the delta.

Such tactics awaited George W. Bush after he became president in 2001. His administration was stymied in efforts to shift environmental policies by legal action and effective lobbying in Congress. By one tally, environmentalists won 27 of their 38 suits against the two-term president.

Endangered Species Act long a Republican target

But the same attitude seen in Natural Resource Defense Council lawsuits against Democratic administrations — why settle for a good result when more is possible? — could soon animate Republicans, especially those who have chafed at how much control the federal government has over land-use decisions in the West. Nunes in particular has long railed against federal indifference to the concerns and needs of Californians.

The Washington consensus is that Feinstein cut a deal because of the fear that a Trump administration would go much further in revamping interpretations of existing water and endangered species laws. This led her to make a major concession to McCarthy: Allowing the secretary of commerce and the secretary of interior to play a key role in determining in how water is allocated between the Delta and farmers.

That provision alone could turn California water policies upside down.

Trump’s nominee for commerce secretary, billionaire investor Wilbur Ross, doesn’t have high-profile views on land-use issues. His nominee for interior secretary, Montana Rep. Ryan Zinke, is open to the federal government allowing much more of its land to be used for oil and gas drilling, but has spoken of the importance of preserving public lands.

There is also the possibility that the Trump administration could target the Endangered Species Act itself — either through executive orders reinterpreting the law or by encouraging congressional action.

Conservative think tanks have long faulted the species act for far more than denying water to Central Valley farmers. It’s viewed as the California Environmental Quality Act is seen by business groups and conservatives in the Golden State: as a blunt, coercive tool to win land-use battles.

A 2007 report by the Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis offers a framework for the sort of policies the Trump administration could pursue.

The most decisive — and most controversial — would simply be for the secretaries of commerce and the interior to make it more difficult to a species to be designated as endangered and easier for a species to be taken off the protected list, reducing the authority now wielded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Conservatives have long argued that designations of 1,300-plus native species and plants are excessive and arbitrary.


Write a comment
  1. mamamia
    mamamia 20 December, 2016, 12:50

    I live in the Feather Falls area of Lake Oroville. For a few years now we are being “told” we are in a drought so they can drain our lake into the ocean. The lake is nearly full when summer starts and nearly empty by the end of summer. (Drought!) Smelt is NOT more important than farmed food. And, the cities of northern CA that supply water to the south are having their water rates go up alarmingly high. Because of this phony drought? It is crooked and the whole system needs to be looked into. Someone is making a lot of money and it is not the farmers, or the merchants of the city of Oroville that used to have hundreds of boaters, campers, hikers, etc. come for the summer. Now there are none. I truly hope that Pres. Trump will have someone come here to see what they have done!

    Reply this comment
  2. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 20 December, 2016, 15:16

    Its time for farmers in the central valley to be consitered more important then some stupid worthless 3 inch fish

    Reply this comment
  3. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 22 December, 2016, 13:41

    Moonbeam Brown need to resign the zoo is missing its wild ass

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

CA may use Prop. 1 water bond to buy enviro water during drought

In the midst of a grueling four-year drought in agriculture, state officials say some $287.5 million in borrowed cash is

Waiting for an education

Katy Grimes: In a mostly empty movie theater in Davis, CA, Monday evening, I saw the new documentary “Waiting For

Being CalPERS means never having to say you’re sorry

Jan. 20, 2013 By Chris Reed So CalPERS is found to allow ridiculous, outrageous double-dipping by salaried employees that boosts